Inside the Box Score: August 1

Minnesota 86, Tulsa 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 72, Tulsa 73
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .500, Tulsa .500
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 13, Tulsa 9
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 26, Tulsa 28
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 17, Tulsa 22
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 16, Tulsa 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 119.4, Tulsa 109.6
Effective FG%: Minnesota .515, Tulsa .444
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .181, Tulsa .123
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .364, Tulsa .364
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .292, Tulsa .381
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore -1 (60-61), Brunson -10 (64-74), Fowles +8 (54-46), Cruz +7 (66-59), Whalen 0 (68-68), Jones +14 (54-40), Montgomery +9 (32-23), Liston +3 (32-29), Kelley 0 (0-0)
Tulsa: Christmas 0 (34-34), Pierson -1 (76-77), Paris 0 (40-40), Williams +5 (76-71), Sims -1 (78-79), Zahui B. -12 (2-14), Hooper -7 (42-49), Kiesel -14 (6-20), Baugh -1 (38-39), Plaisance +1 (8-7)

Inside the Box Score: July 31

Connecticut 67, Seattle 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 80, Connecticut 80
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .502, Connecticut .497
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 19, Connecticut 15
Points in the Paint: Seattle 34, Connecticut 34
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 6, Connecticut 13
Fast Break Points: Seattle 0, Connecticut 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 82.5, Connecticut 83.8
Effective FG%: Seattle .410, Connecticut .421
Turnover Pct: Seattle .188, Connecticut .200
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .176, Connecticut .171
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .262, Connecticut .222
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -4 (45-49), Tokashiki +8 (32-24), Langhorne +6 (56-50), Loyd +8 (49-41), Bird +2 (52-50), Bishop -10 (30-40), Goodrich -9 (24-33), O’Hea 0 (28-28), Gatling -6 (14-20)
Connecticut: A.Thomas +11 (49-38), Little 0 (43-43), Bone -10 (35-45), Bentley -3 (41-44), J.Thomas +6 (45-39), Stricklen -1 (37-38), Faris -2 (3-5), Gray -5 (22-27), Pedersen +1 (24-23), Williams +11 (32-21), Lacy -3 (4-7)

Minnesota 86, Atlanta 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 87, Minnesota 86
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .438, Minnesota .562
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 16, Minnesota 23
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 34, Minnesota 48
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 11, Minnesota 10
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 10, Minnesota 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 80.5, Minnesota 100.0
Effective FG%: Atlanta .445, Minnesota .448
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .230, Minnesota .174
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .171, Minnesota .295
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .203, Minnesota .221
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry -7 (38-45), Dantas -11 (52-63), Henry +2 (50-48), Hayes -4 (60-64), Carter +6 (31-25), Schimmel -22 (35-57), Hodges -11 (35-46), Gray -15 (30-45), Milton-Jones -8 (8-16), Ajavon -10 (11-21)
Minnesota: Moore +16 (65-49), Brunson +16 (52-36), Fowles +5 (40-35), Montgomery +11 (61-50), Whalen +9 (56-47), Liston +12 (70-58), Jones +10 (51-41), Peters +1 (25-24), Kelley 0 (10-10)

Washington 88, San Antonio 53
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 75, San Antonio 73
Rebound Percentage: Washington .573, San Antonio .426
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 16, San Antonio 7
Points in the Paint: Washington 34, San Antonio 22
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 3, San Antonio 0
Fast Break Points: Washington 6, San Antonio 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 117.3, San Antonio 72.6
Effective FG%: Washington .643, San Antonio .373
Turnover Pct: Washington .187, San Antonio .164
Offensive Reb%: Washington .250, San Antonio .103
Free Throw Rate: Washington .111, San Antonio .095
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +23 (42-19), Meesseman +22 (49-27), Dolson +22 (49-27), Cloud +30 (66-36), Lawson +30 (52-22), Latta +10 (39-29), Hill +8 (35-27), Vaughn +13 (39-26), Sanders +10 (27-17), Hartley -1 (16-17), Herrington +5 (14-9), Malott +3 (12-9)
San Antonio: McBride -21 (29-50), Young-Malcolm -25 (44-69), Appel -22 (30-52), Perkins -28 (28-56), Robinson -27 (33-60), Alexander -18 (26-44), Logic -16 (28-44), Colson -14 (24-38), Ayayi -4 (23-27)

Los Angeles 88, Chicago 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 77, Chicago 76
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .499, Chicago .501
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 8, Chicago 8
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 42, Chicago 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 10, Chicago 5
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 8, Chicago 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 114.3, Chicago 101.3
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .508, Chicago .433
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .091, Chicago .118
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .233, Chicago .235
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .318, Chicago .284
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ogwumike +8 (74-66), Parker +18 (81-63), Lavender +3 (72-69), Beard +13 (72-59), Toliver +8 (76-68), Johnson +3 (32-29), Tolo +8 (18-10), Dabovic -2 (14-16), Bradford -4 (1-5)
Chicago: Delle Donne -7 (73-80), Breland -13 (54-67), dos Santos -3 (48-51), Pondexter -6 (59-65), Vandersloot -7 (71-78), de Souza -8 (4-12), Quigley -6 (33-39), Faulkner -4 (6-10), Parker 0 (25-25), Laney -1 (12-13)

Inside the Box Score: July 30

Phoenix 78, Tulsa 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 80, Tulsa 78
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .433, Tulsa .567
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 18, Tulsa 9
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 28, Tulsa 28
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 0, Tulsa 8
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 12, Tulsa 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 97.5, Tulsa 84.6
Effective FG%: Phoenix .565, Tulsa .333
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .200, Tulsa .179
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .080, Tulsa .214
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .315, Tulsa .250
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +16 (78-62), Dupree +12 (64-52), Griner +11 (65-54), Currie -3 (15-18), Mitchell +1 (48-47), Harden -3 (26-29), Quinn +20 (57-37), Bass -3 (14-17), Francis +4 (13-9), Bias +5 (10-5)
Tulsa: Christmas +1 (55-54), Pierson -17 (52-69), Paris -8 (53-61), Williams -8 (61-69), Sims -17 (59-76), Baugh -3 (15-18), Plaisance +4 (12-8), Hooper -13 (11-24), Kiesel +1 (12-11)

Inside the Box Score: July 29

Washington 87, Seattle 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 73, Washington 74
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .490, Washington .510
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 6, Washington 15
Points in the Paint: Seattle 36, Washington 36
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 17, Washington 8
Fast Break Points: Seattle 3, Washington 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 101.4, Washington 117.6
Effective FG%: Seattle .445, Washington .529
Turnover Pct: Seattle .110, Washington .081
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .222, Washington .242
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .123, Washington .186
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -15 (40-55), Tokashiki +2 (39-37), Langhorne -11 (29-40), Loyd -4 (52-56), Bird -19 (30-49), Bishop -15 (35-50), Gatling -11 (20-31), Goodrich -5 (46-51), O’Hea -7 (35-42), Hollingsworth +9 (25-16), Mosqueda-Lewis +11 (19-8)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +20 (51-31), Meesseman +6 (52-46), Dolson -7 (49-56), Cloud +4 (28-24), Lawson +3 (38-35), Latta +7 (57-50), Hartley +11 (21-10), Sanders +5 (46-41), Vaughn +23 (43-20), Hill +4 (48-44), Herrington -6 (0-6), Malott -5 (2-7)

Indiana 84, New York 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 80, Indiana 79
Rebound Percentage: New York .454, Indiana .546
Points Off Turnovers: New York 17, Indiana 24
Points in the Paint: New York 38, Indiana 24
2nd-Chance Points: New York 9, Indiana 19
Fast Break Points: New York 6, Indiana 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 90.0, Indiana 106.3
Effective FG%: New York .500, Indiana .524
Turnover Pct: New York .263, Indiana .215
Offensive Reb%: New York .241, Indiana .333
Free Throw Rate: New York .241, Indiana .286
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Cash -10 (37-47), Charles -1 (71-72), Swords +5 (29-24), Prince +3 (64-61), Wright +1 (56-55), Warley-Talbert -10 (10-20), Carson -14 (29-43), Stokes -10 (25-35), Wiggins -6 (10-16), Rodgers -11 (23-34), Boyd -7 (6-13)
Indiana: Coleman -4 (51-55), Catchings +29 (60-31), Achonwa +1 (16-15), Johnson +16 (60-44), January +21 (67-46), Zellous -3 (49-52), Howard -5 (6-11), Larkins +8 (58-50), Kizer -5 (22-27), Lucas +2 (31-29)

Minnesota 82, Los Angeles 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 79, Minnesota 79
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .442, Minnesota .558
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 11, Minnesota 21
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 24, Minnesota 32
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 5, Minnesota 7
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 10, Minnesota 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 96.2, Minnesota 103.8
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .627, Minnesota .525
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .278, Minnesota .152
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .091, Minnesota .207
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .127, Minnesota .295
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ogwumike -9 (66-75), Parker +2 (70-68), Lavender -1 (74-75), Beard +2 (34-32), Toliver -4 (63-67), Johnson -10 (20-30), Tolo -10 (7-17), Dabovic -1 (40-41), Bradford +1 (6-5)
Minnesota: Moore +10 (75-65), Brunson 0 (55-55), Fowles +6 (51-45), Cruz -10 (44-54), Whalen +6 (68-62), Montgomery +17 (45-28), Jones +3 (39-36), Peters -1 (26-27), Liston -1 (7-8)

San Antonio 102, Atlanta 85
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 84, San Antonio 84
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .503, San Antonio .497
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 15, San Antonio 12
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 50, San Antonio 36
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 14, San Antonio 11
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 23, San Antonio 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 101.2, San Antonio 121.4
Effective FG%: Atlanta .462, San Antonio .600
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .155, San Antonio .214
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .265, San Antonio .259
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .364, San Antonio .369
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hodges -11 (37-48), Dantas -8 (70-78), Henry -20 (67-87), Hayes -13 (55-68), Carter -12 (14-26), Ajavon -8 (43-51), McCoughtry -9 (45-54), Gray -6 (33-39), Schimmel +2 (61-59)
San Antonio: McBride +22 (70-48), Young-Malcolm +16 (67-51), Appel +21 (86-65), Perkins +21 (53-32), Robinson +18 (72-54), Logic +1 (57-56), Alexander -1 (51-52), Colson -7 (29-36), Ayayi -6 (25-31)

Inside the Box Score: July 28

Indiana 75, Connecticut 73 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 81, Connecticut 81
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .555, Connecticut .445
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 18, Connecticut 20
Points in the Paint: Indiana 46, Connecticut 40
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 21, Connecticut 4
Fast Break Points: Indiana 6, Connecticut 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 92.6, Connecticut 90.1
Effective FG%: Indiana .420, Connecticut .469
Turnover Pct: Indiana .198, Connecticut .235
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .351, Connecticut .241
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .086, Connecticut .185
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman +11 (42-31), Catchings +1 (48-47), Achonwa +12 (36-24), Johnson +9 (58-49), January +15 (63-48), Clarendon -3 (8-11), Kizer -8 (8-16), Zellous -9 (44-53), Larkins -5 (37-42), Pohlen -8 (6-14), Lucas -9 (4-13), Howard +4 (21-17)
Connecticut: A.Thomas -15 (36-51), Little -8 (39-47), Bone -8 (46-54), Bentley -5 (41-46), J.Thomas -2 (52-54), Gray 0 (21-21), Williams +5 (22-17), Pedersen +7 (39-32), Stricklen +9 (42-33), Faris +7 (27-20)

Phoenix 89, Chicago 87 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 91, Phoenix 89
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .564, Phoenix .436
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 12, Phoenix 18
Points in the Paint: Chicago 32, Phoenix 42
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 14, Phoenix 10
Fast Break Points: Chicago 6, Phoenix 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 95.6, Phoenix 100.0
Effective FG%: Chicago .407, Phoenix .486
Turnover Pct: Chicago .143, Phoenix .169
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .317, Phoenix .189
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .198, Phoenix .300
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Delle Donne 0 (74-74), Breland -13 (43-56), dos Santos +4 (40-36), Pondexter +2 (70-68), Vandersloot +3 (79-76), Quigley +2 (67-65), de Souza -2 (28-30), Faulkner -5 (8-13), Laney +2 (7-5), Parker -3 (19-22)
Phoenix: Bonner -2 (74-76), Dupree -2 (69-71), Griner +4 (62-58), Currie +6 (61-55), Mitchell 0 (58-58), Bass -2 (27-29), Quinn -4 (50-54), Harden +2 (25-23), Bias +1 (3-2), Francis +7 (16-9)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.