Inside the Box Score: July 20

Chicago 82, Los Angeles 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 77, Los Angeles 76
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .541, Los Angeles .458
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 17, Los Angeles 15
Points in the Paint: Chicago 42, Los Angeles 42
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 11, Los Angeles 8
Fast Break Points: Chicago 7, Los Angeles 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 106.5, Los Angeles 105.3
Effective FG%: Chicago .545, Los Angeles .530
Turnover Pct: Chicago .156, Los Angeles .158
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .226, Los Angeles .143
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .152, Los Angeles .152
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +3 (65-62), Breland -7 (38-45), Dolson +2 (52-50), Quigley +4 (71-67), Vandersloot 0 (76-76), Boyette +15 (46-31), Pondexter 0 (28-28), Parker -3 (11-14), Hampton -5 (4-9), Copper +1 (19-18)
Los Angeles: Carson -4 (11-15), Ogwumike +1 (70-69), Parker -8 (70-78), Beard -7 (69-76), Gray +3 (69-66), Williams +9 (61-52), Lavender +1 (22-21), Sims -1 (26-27), Wiese -4 (2-6)

San Antonio 85, Indiana 61
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 75, San Antonio 76
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .475, San Antonio .525
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 25, San Antonio 23
Points in the Paint: Indiana 20, San Antonio 48
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 10, San Antonio 4
Fast Break Points: Indiana 15, San Antonio 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 81.3, San Antonio 111.8
Effective FG%: Indiana .386, San Antonio .636
Turnover Pct: Indiana .213, San Antonio .237
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .250, San Antonio .300
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .152, San Antonio .273
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman -9 (2-11), Dupree -17 (30-47), Achonwa +2 (37-35), Wheeler -16 (39-55), January -11 (44-55), Mitchell -11 (54-65), Pohlen-Mavunga -4 (23-27), Larkins -24 (14-38), McCall -7 (31-38), Gwathmey -21 (21-42), Hamson -2 (10-12)
San Antonio: Montgomery +17 (43-26), Harrison +24 (55-31), de Souza +10 (35-25), Plum +28 (73-45), Jefferson +25 (59-34), Hamby +21 (52-31), Holmes +7 (42-35), Alexander -2 (18-20), Colson +3 (36-33), Coffey -5 (10-15), Murphy -8 (2-10)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 20) here or here.

Inside the Box Score: July 19

New York 96, Connecticut 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 77, New York 79
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .374, New York .625
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 12, New York 8
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 34, New York 34
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 13, New York 24
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 4, New York 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 103.9, New York 121.5
Effective FG%: Connecticut .446, New York .546
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .052, New York .190
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .163, New York .414
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .189, New York .385
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen -8 (36-44), A.Thomas -10 (47-57), J.Jones -10 (45-55), Williams -3 (62-65), J.Thomas -7 (44-51), Tuck -18 (29-47), Bentley -10 (46-56), Banham -11 (25-36), Pedersen -7 (6-13), B.Jones 0 (12-12), Kizer +3 (29-26), Adams +1 (19-18)
New York: Zellous +12 (74-62), Charles +12 (73-61), Vaughn -6 (35-41), Prince +4 (55-51), Hartley +5 (64-59), Rodgers +12 (41-29), Stokes +17 (59-42), L.Allen +11 (32-21), Raincock-Ekunwe +7 (21-14), R.Allen +4 (22-18), Zahui B. +2 (4-2)

Washington 100, Atlanta 96 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 87, Washington 90
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .438, Washington .562
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 14, Washington 15
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 38, Washington 38
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 10, Washington 31
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 17, Washington 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 110.3, Washington 111.1
Effective FG%: Atlanta .521, Washington .494
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .184, Washington .144
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .257, Washington .381
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .310, Washington .135
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Sykes +6 (86-80), Lyttle -4 (62-66), Williams -4 (74-78), Hayes -3 (71-74), Clarendon -4 (72-76), Holmes -10 (24-34), Dantas +2 (56-54), Ajavon 0 (24-24), Hooper -3 (11-14)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -8 (29-37), Meesseman +10 (88-78), Thomas -3 (81-84), Walker-Kimbrough -15 (41-56), Toliver +13 (88-75), Cloud +12 (71-59), Hawkins +1 (31-30), Latta +10 (71-61)

Minnesota 100, Dallas 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 83, Minnesota 83
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .454, Minnesota .545
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 13, Minnesota 16
Points in the Paint: Dallas 28, Minnesota 48
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 11, Minnesota 12
Fast Break Points: Dallas 13, Minnesota 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 89.2, Minnesota 120.5
Effective FG%: Dallas .393, Minnesota .627
Turnover Pct: Dallas .169, Minnesota .205
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .195, Minnesota .286
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .200, Minnesota .239
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Christmas-Kelly -18 (45-63), Johnson -19 (55-74), Plaisance -8 (50-58), Gray -24 (59-83), Diggins-Smith -15 (69-84), Paris -17 (16-33), Chong -13 (29-42), Thornton -13 (34-47), Lewis -1 (8-9), Akhator -2 (5-7)
Minnesota: Moore +33 (72-39), Brunson +33 (81-48), Fowles +19 (65-46), Augustus +21 (66-45), Whalen +25 (60-35), Montgomery +7 (51-44), Perkins -5 (38-43), Pierson +2 (36-34), Howard -7 (13-20), Fagbenle +1 (9-8), Jones +1 (9-8)

Indiana 84, Phoenix 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 75, Phoenix 75
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .455, Phoenix .545
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 21, Phoenix 8
Points in the Paint: Indiana 32, Phoenix 20
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 11, Phoenix 13
Fast Break Points: Indiana 6, Phoenix 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 112.0, Phoenix 102.7
Effective FG%: Indiana .542, Phoenix .434
Turnover Pct: Indiana .187, Phoenix .200
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .200, Phoenix .290
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .317, Phoenix .265
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman -9 (36-45), Dupree +5 (62-57), Achonwa 0 (8-8), Wheeler +3 (75-72), January 0 (55-55), Larkins +9 (54-45), Mitchell +18 (57-39), Pohlen-Mavunga +13 (25-12), McCall +2 (22-20), Hamson -2 (22-24), Gwathmey -4 (4-8)
Phoenix: Talbot +5 (35-30), Little -10 (56-66), A.Robinson 0 (56-56), Taurasi +3 (68-65), D.Robinson +1 (50-49), Cannon -3 (13-16), Currie -12 (42-54), Turner -11 (3-14), Mitchell -7 (33-40), George -1 (29-30)

Inside the Box Score: July 18

Atlanta 88, San Antonio 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 84, Atlanta 86
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .476, Atlanta .523
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 15, Atlanta 17
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 36, Atlanta 32
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 13, Atlanta 17
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 17, Atlanta 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 89.3, Atlanta 102.3
Effective FG%: San Antonio .449, Atlanta .375
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .238, Atlanta .116
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .278, Atlanta .325
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .188, Atlanta .472
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Montgomery -14 (55-69), Harrison -7 (55-62), de Souza -7 (12-19), Plum -9 (40-49), Jefferson -3 (55-58), Hamby -7 (67-74), Holmes -1 (39-40), Murphy -1 (21-22), Alexander 0 (12-12), Colson -11 (15-26), Coffey -5 (4-9)
Atlanta: Sykes +7 (57-50), Lyttle +10 (46-36), Williams +16 (80-64), Hayes +22 (60-38), Clarendon +24 (74-50), Holmes +9 (54-45), Dantas -7 (40-47), Hooper -5 (15-20), Hopkins -9 (1-10), Ajavon -2 (13-15)

Chicago 94, Seattle 83
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 77, Seattle 79
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .511, Seattle .488
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 23, Seattle 12
Points in the Paint: Chicago 42, Seattle 28
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 14, Seattle 9
Fast Break Points: Chicago 8, Seattle 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 122.1, Seattle 105.1
Effective FG%: Chicago .520, Seattle .554
Turnover Pct: Chicago .130, Seattle .228
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .303, Seattle .280
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .197, Seattle .375
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +8 (76-68), Breland +5 (43-38), Dolson 0 (65-65), Quigley +2 (64-62), Vandersloot +9 (77-68), Boyette +2 (42-40), Copper -8 (21-29), Parker +15 (38-23), Hampton +22 (44-22)
Seattle: Clark +1 (65-64), Stewart -11 (81-92), Langhorne -10 (58-68), Loyd -10 (58-68), Bird -8 (67-75), Peterson +1 (8-7), Swords +1 (21-20), Whitcomb -10 (27-37), Tokashiki 0 (2-2), Mosqueda-Lewis -7 (2-9), Quinn -2 (26-28)

Inside the Box Score: July 17

Los Angeles 80, Indiana 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 73, Los Angeles 74
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .499, Los Angeles .501
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 15, Los Angeles 18
Points in the Paint: Indiana 16, Los Angeles 52
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 10, Los Angeles 10
Fast Break Points: Indiana 3, Los Angeles 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 84.9, Los Angeles 108.1
Effective FG%: Indiana .457, Los Angeles .570
Turnover Pct: Indiana .247, Los Angeles .189
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .206, Los Angeles .208
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .155, Los Angeles .109
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman -13 (42-55), Dupree -20 (45-65), Achonwa -16 (29-45), Wheeler -2 (42-44), January -22 (47-69), Mitchell -18 (43-61), Larkins -2 (33-35), McCall +2 (17-15), Pohlen-Mavunga +1 (12-11)
Los Angeles: Carson +17 (32-15), Ogwumike +19 (69-50), Parker +21 (56-35), Beard +17 (63-46), Gray +24 (68-44), Lavender +1 (35-34), Williams -1 (42-43), Sims -4 (25-29), Wiese +1 (10-9), Jackson-Jones -5 (0-5), Diarra 0 (0-0)

Inside the Box Score: July 16

Connecticut 89, San Antonio 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 76, Connecticut 78
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .482, Connecticut .517
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 11, Connecticut 20
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 50, Connecticut 52
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 9, Connecticut 17
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 7, Connecticut 17
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 98.7, Connecticut 114.1
Effective FG%: San Antonio .486, Connecticut .542
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .211, Connecticut .115
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .265, Connecticut .300
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .085, Connecticut .153
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Montgomery -8 (54-62), Harrison -8 (49-57), de Souza -10 (10-20), McBride -16 (46-62), Plum -4 (28-32), Hamby +4 (64-60), Alexander -8 (22-30), Jefferson -5 (38-43), Colson -8 (35-43), Holmes -4 (8-12), Coffey +3 (21-18), Murphy -6 (0-6)
Connecticut: Stricklen +13 (50-37), A.Thomas +13 (57-44), J.Jones +19 (56-37), Williams +22 (51-29), J.Thomas +18 (63-45), Bentley +1 (52-51), Kizer -2 (9-11), Banham -7 (31-38), Tuck -1 (34-35), Pedersen +10 (27-17), B.Jones -9 (10-19), Adams -7 (5-12)

New York 85, Washington 55
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 78, New York 77
Rebound Percentage: Washington .430, New York .570
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 10, New York 10
Points in the Paint: Washington 18, New York 36
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 4, New York 17
Fast Break Points: Washington 0, New York 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 70.5, New York 110.4
Effective FG%: Washington .323, New York .487
Turnover Pct: Washington .154, New York .143
Offensive Reb%: Washington .163, New York .303
Free Throw Rate: Washington .200, New York .160
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -9 (24-33), Meesseman -17 (34-51), Thomas -23 (30-53), Latta -25 (37-62), Toliver -19 (28-47), Cloud -21 (31-52), Hawkins -15 (37-52), Walker-Kimbrough -6 (37-43), Taylor -8 (9-17), Simms -7 (8-15)
New York: Zellous +25 (54-29), Charles +21 (39-18), Vaughn +11 (29-18), Prince +16 (41-25), Hartley +18 (47-29), Rodgers +14 (46-32), Stokes +10 (45-35), Raincock-Ekunwe +12 (38-26), L.Allen +12 (38-26), R.Allen +5 (29-24), Zahui B. +6 (19-13)

Dallas 112, Chicago 106 (2OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 104, Dallas 103
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .466, Dallas .534
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 16, Dallas 26
Points in the Paint: Chicago 46, Dallas 58
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 14, Dallas 27
Fast Break Points: Chicago 16, Dallas 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 101.9, Dallas 108.7
Effective FG%: Chicago .470, Dallas .376
Turnover Pct: Chicago .212, Dallas .117
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .341, Dallas .409
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .321, Dallas .402
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +8 (70-62), Breland -3 (89-92), Dolson -6 (86-92), Quigley 0 (99-99), Vandersloot -6 (94-100), Boyette -2 (7-9), Copper -17 (36-53), Parker +3 (34-31), Hampton -4 (6-10), Harris -3 (9-12)
Dallas: Christmas-Kelly -1 (80-81), Johnson +3 (52-49), Plaisance +3 (54-51), Gray -9 (68-77), Diggins-Smith +6 (99-93), Thornton +4 (66-62), Chong 0 (22-22), Paris +3 (42-39), Davis +21 (77-56)

Minnesota 81, Phoenix 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 78, Minnesota 78
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .527, Minnesota .473
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 10, Minnesota 11
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 24, Minnesota 30
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 5, Minnesota 4
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Minnesota 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 84.6, Minnesota 103.8
Effective FG%: Phoenix .442, Minnesota .460
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .205, Minnesota .154
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .242, Minnesota .188
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .217, Minnesota .387
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Talbot -14 (35-49), Little -9 (50-59), A.Robinson -9 (33-42), Currie -11 (43-54), D.Robinson -11 (43-54), Cannon -9 (38-47), Mitchell -4 (29-33), Turner -8 (43-51), George -3 (11-14), Prince +3 (5-2)
Minnesota: Moore +9 (62-53), Brunson +2 (51-49), Fowles +12 (67-55), Augustus +16 (50-34), Whalen +1 (33-32), Montgomery +17 (46-29), Howard -3 (8-11), Perkins +12 (46-34), Pierson +15 (38-23), Fagbenle -3 (2-5), Jones -3 (2-5)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 16) here or here.