Inside the Box Score: August 16

Connecticut 79, Seattle 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 86, Connecticut 86
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .508, Connecticut .492
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 17, Connecticut 28
Points in the Paint: Seattle 40, Connecticut 40
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 15, Connecticut 21
Fast Break Points: Seattle 11, Connecticut 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 90.7, Connecticut 91.9
Effective FG%: Seattle .541, Connecticut .439
Turnover Pct: Seattle .314, Connecticut .186
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .286, Connecticut .270
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .197, Connecticut .189
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -6 (57-63), Howard -1 (73-74), Russell -9 (41-50), Whitcomb -5 (61-66), Zellous -12 (13-25), Loyd +11 (65-54), Mosqueda-Lewis +5 (21-16), Langhorne +8 (37-29), Dietrick +4 (17-13), Paris 0 (5-5)
Connecticut: Stricklen +15 (75-60), A.Thomas +11 (77-66), J.Jones +20 (64-44), Williams +5 (62-57), J.Thomas +7 (69-62), Banham 0 (4-4), Holmes -18 (17-35), Plaisance -14 (0-14), Tuck -10 (2-12), B.Jones -5 (15-20), Hiedeman -6 (10-16)

Chicago 91, Los Angeles 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 78, Chicago 79
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .426, Chicago .574
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 14, Chicago 18
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 36, Chicago 32
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 10, Chicago 22
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 7, Chicago 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 103.8, Chicago 115.2
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .451, Chicago .567
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .167, Chicago .228
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .206, Chicago .355
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .239, Chicago .224
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt +4 (51-47), Parker -11 (60-71), N.Ogwumike +13 (61-48), Wiese -4 (57-61), Gray -5 (81-86), C.Ogwumike -8 (25-33), Beard -13 (47-60), Vadeeva -14 (16-30), Jones -12 (7-19)
Chicago: DeShields +1 (68-67), Ndour -5 (51-56), Dolson +23 (75-52), Quigley +19 (82-63), Vandersloot +20 (83-63), Parker -3 (45-48), Copper -14 (12-26), Williams +4 (28-24), Samuelson +5 (11-6)

Dallas 83, New York 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 77, Dallas 77
Rebound Percentage: New York .530, Dallas .470
Points Off Turnovers: New York 17, Dallas 18
Points in the Paint: New York 28, Dallas 22
2nd-Chance Points: New York 14, Dallas 13
Fast Break Points: New York 12, Dallas 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 100.0, Dallas 107.8
Effective FG%: New York .452, Dallas .452
Turnover Pct: New York .221, Dallas .182
Offensive Reb%: New York .455, Dallas .394
Free Throw Rate: New York .339, Dallas .435
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Nurse -6 (62-68), Gray +2 (26-24), Charles -3 (73-76), Wright +4 (62-58), Hartley +2 (50-48), Allen -5 (28-33), Johannès -13 (27-40), Boyd -5 (15-20), Raincock-Ekunwe -6 (42-48)
Dallas: Gray +8 (66-58), Johnson +3 (67-64), Harrison +6 (64-58), Davis -1 (49-50), Ogunbowale +4 (72-68), McGee-Stafford +8 (39-31), McCarty-Williams -1 (44-45), Gustafson +3 (14-11)

Washington 86, Minnesota 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 81, Minnesota 82
Rebound Percentage: Washington .431, Minnesota .569
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 23, Minnesota 14
Points in the Paint: Washington 22, Minnesota 40
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 5, Minnesota 8
Fast Break Points: Washington 9, Minnesota 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 106.2, Minnesota 96.3
Effective FG%: Washington .547, Minnesota .492
Turnover Pct: Washington .160, Minnesota .232
Offensive Reb%: Washington .094, Minnesota .231
Free Throw Rate: Washington .250, Minnesota .333
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Atkins +12 (72-60), Delle Donne +11 (74-63), Sanders +8 (47-39), Powers -4 (44-48), Cloud +11 (81-70), Walker-Kimbrough -9 (29-38), Meesseman +14 (66-52), Hawkins -8 (17-25)
Minnesota: Collier -14 (57-71), Dantas -12 (56-68), Fowles -14 (58-72), Augustus -7 (9-16), Sims -12 (61-73), Robinson +4 (53-49), Talbot +6 (55-49), Brown +9 (26-17), Fagbenle +5 (20-15)

Phoenix 77, Atlanta 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 75, Phoenix 76
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .501, Phoenix .499
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 12, Phoenix 12
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 36, Phoenix 22
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 15, Phoenix 12
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 5, Phoenix 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 90.7, Phoenix 101.3
Effective FG%: Atlanta .433, Phoenix .492
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .173, Phoenix .197
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .275, Phoenix .273
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .149, Phoenix .219
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hayes -5 (53-58), Breland -5 (50-55), Williams 0 (59-59), Sykes +6 (53-47), Montgomery -6 (62-68), Coffey -9 (13-22), Bentley -16 (23-39), Cazorla -6 (13-19), Gülich -4 (14-18)
Phoenix: Y.Turner -1 (57-58), Bonner +6 (71-65), B.Turner +19 (74-55), Mitchell -1 (57-58), January +14 (61-47), Little +6 (43-37), Carter -3 (7-10), Cunningham +5 (15-10)

Advertisements

Inside the Box Score: August 14

Washington 88, Seattle 59
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 73, Washington 74
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .520, Washington .480
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 14, Washington 29
Points in the Paint: Seattle 18, Washington 28
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 6, Washington 9
Fast Break Points: Seattle 0, Washington 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 80.8, Washington 118.9
Effective FG%: Seattle .408, Washington .588
Turnover Pct: Seattle .260, Washington .189
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .257, Washington .217
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .167, Washington .368
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -26 (35-61), Howard -24 (55-79), Russell -28 (35-63), Whitcomb -20 (33-53), Canada -11 (35-46), Loyd -17 (24-41), Langhorne -8 (19-27), Mosqueda-Lewis -3 (24-27), Zellous -9 (22-31), Paris +2 (9-7), Dietrick -1 (4-5)
Washington: Atkins +26 (63-37), Delle Donne +26 (72-46), Sanders +26 (54-28), Powers +6 (48-42), Cloud +3 (50-47), Meesseman +18 (47-29), Hawkins +7 (32-25), Walker-Kimbrough +23 (50-27), Hines-Allen +8 (14-6), Peddy +1 (5-4), Mestdagh +1 (5-4)

Dallas 84, Los Angeles 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 76, Dallas 76
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .398, Dallas .602
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 20, Dallas 14
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 40, Dallas 32
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 14, Dallas 10
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 6, Dallas 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 102.6, Dallas 110.5
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .478, Dallas .547
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .197, Dallas .263
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .138, Dallas .343
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .191, Dallas .219
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt -3 (54-57), Parker -6 (53-59), N.Ogwumike -3 (60-63), Wiese +5 (63-58), Gray -7 (75-82), Beard -1 (26-27), Vadeeva -10 (18-28), C.Ogwumike 0 (25-25), Jones -6 (13-19), Mabrey +1 (3-2)
Dallas: Gray +10 (84-74), Johnson +15 (67-52), Harrison +5 (58-53), Davis -6 (41-47), Ogunbowale +6 (84-78), McCarty-Williams -4 (19-23), Gustafson +2 (19-17), McGee-Stafford +2 (48-46)

Connecticut 78, Phoenix 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 81, Phoenix 79
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .535, Phoenix .465
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 21, Phoenix 16
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 38, Phoenix 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 11, Phoenix 12
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 8, Phoenix 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 96.3, Phoenix 89.9
Effective FG%: Connecticut .500, Phoenix .395
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .198, Phoenix .253
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .361, Phoenix .290
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .164, Phoenix .456
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen +11 (40-29), A.Thomas +9 (67-58), J.Jones +17 (66-49), Williams +6 (64-58), J.Thomas +13 (66-53), Hiedeman -6 (12-18), Plaisance -10 (12-22), Holmes -4 (38-42), Banham +1 (14-13), Tuck -2 (11-13)
Phoenix: Cunningham -20 (33-53), Bonner -17 (48-65), B.Turner -8 (52-60), Y.Turner +2 (49-47), Mitchell -17 (56-73), January 0 (34-34), Little +13 (51-38), Taylor +9 (27-18), Carter +3 (5-2)

Inside the Box Score: August 13

Minnesota 89, New York 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 81, New York 80
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .478, New York .522
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 22, New York 14
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 42, New York 28
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 6, New York 2
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, New York 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 109.9, New York 91.3
Effective FG%: Minnesota .563, New York .500
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .173, New York .238
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .206, New York .250
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .266, New York .106
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Collier +12 (80-68), Dantas +8 (32-24), Fowles +12 (54-42), Augustus +10 (25-15), Sims +7 (65-58), Robinson +6 (64-58), Fagbenle +8 (27-19), Talbot +8 (58-50), Brown +9 (35-26), Alleyne 0 (5-5)
New York: Nurse -2 (68-70), Gray -7 (23-30), Charles -20 (55-75), Wright -6 (39-45), Hartley -25 (32-57), Raincock-Ekunwe -8 (2-10), Johannès +2 (41-39), Allen -5 (61-66), Boyd -11 (37-48), Han +2 (7-5)

Las Vegas 94, Atlanta 90
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 84, Las Vegas 84
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .467, Las Vegas .533
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 19, Las Vegas 16
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 20, Las Vegas 36
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 14, Las Vegas 10
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 9, Las Vegas 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 107.1, Las Vegas 111.9
Effective FG%: Atlanta .480, Las Vegas .523
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .131, Las Vegas .155
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .250, Las Vegas .316
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .224, Las Vegas .379
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hayes -25 (45-70), Breland -10 (69-79), Williams -14 (29-43), Sykes -12 (45-57), Montgomery -2 (61-63), Bentley +13 (72-59), Gülich +18 (76-58), Cazorla +14 (34-20), Coffey -2 (19-21)
Las Vegas: McBride +2 (80-78), Hamby +2 (90-88), Cambage +13 (83-70), J.Young +14 (83-69), Plum +11 (69-58), T.Young -6 (30-36), Swords -9 (9-18), Colson -9 (6-15), Rodgers 0 (16-16), Park +2 (4-2)

Inside the Box Score: August 11

Seattle 84, New York 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 76, New York 76
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .510, New York .490
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 26, New York 16
Points in the Paint: Seattle 38, New York 32
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 12, New York 14
Fast Break Points: Seattle 7, New York 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 110.5, New York 90.8
Effective FG%: Seattle .530, New York .469
Turnover Pct: Seattle .158, New York .250
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .375, New York .355
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .194, New York .141
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark +8 (61-53), Howard +21 (78-57), Russell +13 (64-51), Whitcomb +15 (64-49), Canada +14 (64-50), Langhorne -4 (20-24), Loyd +2 (22-20), Mosqueda-Lewis +7 (23-16), Paris 0 (6-6), Zellous -1 (18-19)
New York: Nurse -5 (54-59), Gray -19 (20-39), Charles -15 (61-76), Wright -1 (46-47), Hartley -11 (59-70), Raincock-Ekunwe 0 (37-37), Allen -6 (27-33), Johannès -5 (10-15), Boyd -13 (23-36), Han 0 (8-8)

Washington 101, Minnesota 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 79, Washington 81
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .429, Washington .571
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 17, Washington 22
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 36, Washington 36
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 7, Washington 16
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Washington 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 98.7, Washington 124.7
Effective FG%: Minnesota .523, Washington .597
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .228, Washington .198
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .233, Washington .375
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .154, Washington .435
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Talbot -8 (60-68), Collier -9 (55-64), Fowles -13 (45-58), Augustus -13 (27-40), Sims -19 (73-92), Robinson -14 (41-55), Fagbenle -8 (46-54), Brown -21 (33-54), Alleyne -10 (10-20)
Washington: Atkins +4 (38-34), Delle Donne +11 (78-67), Sanders +15 (63-48), Powers +19 (90-71), Cloud +15 (87-72), Walker-Kimbrough +17 (44-27), Meesseman +16 (70-54), Hines-Allen +14 (28-14), Mestdagh +4 (7-3)

Los Angeles 84, Chicago 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 89, Los Angeles 88
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .528, Los Angeles .472
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 28, Los Angeles 23
Points in the Paint: Chicago 38, Los Angeles 42
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 11, Los Angeles 8
Fast Break Points: Chicago 11, Los Angeles 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 91.0, Los Angeles 95.5
Effective FG%: Chicago .477, Los Angeles .507
Turnover Pct: Chicago .281, Los Angeles .261
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .306, Los Angeles .250
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .292, Los Angeles .186
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Williams -4 (72-76), Ndour +1 (64-63), Dolson -3 (47-50), DeShields +5 (61-56), Quigley 0 (55-55), Copper -9 (35-44), Parker -2 (51-53), Jackson +1 (9-8), Samuelson -4 (11-15)
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt -5 (62-67), Parker +4 (68-64), N.Ogwumike -1 (64-65), Wiese +6 (64-58), Gray -3 (66-69), Jones 0 (20-20), Mabrey +8 (34-26), Vadeeva +4 (20-16), C.Ogwumike +2 (22-20)

Las Vegas 89, Connecticut 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 80, Las Vegas 80
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .471, Las Vegas .529
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 13, Las Vegas 14
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 36, Las Vegas 40
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 12, Las Vegas 15
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 14, Las Vegas 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 101.3, Las Vegas 111.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .451, Las Vegas .514
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .125, Las Vegas .213
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .275, Las Vegas .333
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .099, Las Vegas .208
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen -16 (42-58), A.Thomas -8 (52-60), J.Jones -8 (60-68), Williams -18 (54-72), J.Thomas -10 (60-70), Holmes +8 (39-31), Banham +10 (27-17), Hiedeman +2 (21-19), Plaisance 0 (21-21), Tuck 0 (29-29)
Las Vegas: McBride +17 (80-63), Hamby +6 (86-80), Cambage +11 (62-51), J.Young +2 (65-63), Plum +10 (75-65), T.Young +7 (35-28), Rodgers -9 (9-18), Park -7 (3-10), Colson +2 (8-6), Swords +1 (22-21)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 11) here or here.

Inside the Box Score: August 10

Indiana 87, Atlanta 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 79, Indiana 78
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .467, Indiana .533
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 11, Indiana 18
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 24, Indiana 28
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 9, Indiana 9
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 4, Indiana 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 103.8, Indiana 111.5
Effective FG%: Atlanta .530, Indiana .452
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .190, Indiana .141
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .216, Indiana .282
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .182, Indiana .288
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hayes -7 (73-80), Breland +7 (54-47), Williams 0 (66-66), Sykes +3 (75-72), Montgomery -3 (60-63), Cazorla -6 (26-32), Coffey -4 (16-20), Gülich +2 (11-9), Billings -12 (28-40), Coates -5 (1-6)
Indiana: Laney -4 (42-46), Dupree +6 (81-75), Achonwa -10 (33-43), T.Mitchell -4 (54-58), Wheeler +12 (81-69), K.Mitchell +5 (45-40), McCall -1 (6-7), Burke -3 (6-9), Johnson +9 (33-24), McCowan +12 (45-33), Mavunga +3 (9-6)

Dallas 80, Phoenix 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 74, Phoenix 73
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .438, Phoenix .562
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 19, Phoenix 10
Points in the Paint: Dallas 32, Phoenix 32
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 18, Phoenix 13
Fast Break Points: Dallas 12, Phoenix 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 108.1, Phoenix 105.5
Effective FG%: Dallas .484, Phoenix .400
Turnover Pct: Dallas .189, Phoenix .164
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .276, Phoenix .400
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .323, Phoenix .483
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Thornton +3 (60-57), Johnson +2 (54-52), Harrison +7 (64-57), Gray +5 (69-64), Ogunbowale +2 (73-71), McGee-Stafford +6 (34-28), Davis -5 (15-20), McCarty-Williams +5 (20-15), Anigwe -4 (4-8), Gustafson -6 (7-13)
Phoenix: Bonner +4 (66-62), B.Turner +2 (55-53), Griner -1 (63-64), Y.Turner -6 (56-62), Mitchell -6 (61-67), January +6 (37-31), Little -7 (36-43), Cunningham 0 (8-8), Taylor -7 (3-10)