Inside the Box Score: June 10

New York 81, Indiana 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 74, Indiana 75
Rebound Percentage: New York .498, Indiana .501
Points Off Turnovers: New York 18, Indiana 3
Points in the Paint: New York 34, Indiana 22
2nd-Chance Points: New York 14, Indiana 19
Fast Break Points: New York 6, Indiana 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 109.5, Indiana 106.7
Effective FG%: New York .535, Indiana .523
Turnover Pct: New York .176, Indiana .173
Offensive Reb%: New York .300, Indiana .303
Free Throw Rate: New York .070, Indiana .203
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Powell -4 (53-57), Pierson -2 (49-51), Vaughn +6 (59-53), Carson +5 (44-39), Pondexter +6 (68-62), Hollingsworth -2 (22-24), Breland +3 (32-29), Mitchell -3 (37-40), Montgomery -6 (15-21), Spencer +2 (26-24)
Indiana: Catchings -2 (61-63), Smith -3 (57-60), Sutton-Brown -8 (40-48), Douglas +5 (80-75), January +1 (61-60), Davenport +6 (37-31), Phillips +10 (45-35), Zellous -3 (12-15), Ely -5 (7-12), Pohlen -6 (0-6)

San Antonio 93, Tulsa 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 81, Tulsa 80
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .499, Tulsa .501
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 19, Tulsa 14
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 30, Tulsa 24
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 6, Tulsa 6
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 15, Tulsa 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 114.8, Tulsa 77.5
Effective FG%: San Antonio .621, Tulsa .364
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .185, Tulsa .200
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .192, Tulsa .194
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .258, Tulsa .212
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Hodges +14 (44-30), Young +21 (51-30), Riley +10 (32-22), Hammon +22 (56-34), Bevilaqua +8 (36-28), Adams +21 (61-40), Perkins +17 (49-32), Phillips +10 (42-32), D.Robinson +23 (57-34), S.Robinson +9 (37-28)
Tulsa: Lacy -8 (8-16), Jackson -19 (44-63), Cambage -25 (40-65), Swoopes -9 (22-31), Latta -12 (36-48), Pedersen -20 (50-70), Ayim -8 (32-40), Jones -7 (10-17), Riley -29 (30-59), Reed -18 (38-56)

Chicago 78, Connecticut 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 79, Chicago 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .451, Chicago .549
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 14, Chicago 10
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 26, Chicago 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 5, Chicago 4
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 6, Chicago 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 94.9, Chicago 100.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .470, Chicago .538
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .127, Chicago .167
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .114, Chicago .212
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .197, Chicago .106
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene -2 (44-46), Jones -3 (52-55), Charles -7 (50-57), Lawson -7 (45-52), Montgomery -6 (62-68), White +7 (46-39), McCray -5 (16-21), Griffin +4 (27-23), Walker +2 (21-19), Moore -2 (0-2), Hightower +4 (12-8)
Chicago: Kraayeveld +8 (67-59), Snow +14 (61-47), Fowles +5 (64-59), Prince +5 (73-68), Vandersloot +4 (59-55), Wisdom-Hylton -7 (17-24), Canty -8 (29-37), Young +2 (4-2), Thorn -2 (10-12), Swords -6 (6-12)

Los Angeles 98, Phoenix 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 78, Los Angeles 79
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .577, Los Angeles .423
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 9, Los Angeles 16
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 38, Los Angeles 28
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 14, Los Angeles 9
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 13, Los Angeles 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 107.7, Los Angeles 124.1
Effective FG%: Phoenix .507, Los Angeles .590
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .167, Los Angeles .101
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .361, Los Angeles .207
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .137, Los Angeles .284
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Taylor -5 (74-79), Dupree -8 (81-89), Braxton -10 (34-44), Taurasi -21 (61-82), Johnson -10 (73-83), Bonner -6 (48-54), Ferdinand-Harris -2 (33-35), Swanier -4 (11-15), Sanni -4 (5-9)
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones +9 (64-55), Thompson +10 (83-73), Parker +12 (96-84), Quinn 0 (65-65), Penicheiro +2 (58-56), O’Hea +7 (20-13), Hoffman +11 (43-32), Toliver +17 (59-42), Lavender +2 (2-0)

Advertisement
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: