Monthly Archives: August 2011

Inside the Box Score: August 30

New York 71, Chicago 67
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 74, New York 76
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .445, New York .555
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 13, New York 25
Points in the Paint: Chicago 26, New York 26
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 11, New York 16
Fast Break Points: Chicago 8, New York 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 90.5, New York 93.4
Effective FG%: Chicago .480, New York .373
Turnover Pct: Chicago .297, New York .158
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .214, New York .324
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .353, New York .458
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -11 (45-56), Snow +1 (23-22), Fowles +2 (60-58), Thorn -14 (34-48), Canty -4 (29-33), Prince +7 (56-49), Kraayeveld -8 (33-41), Vandersloot +10 (37-27), Swords -6 (14-20), Wisdom-Hylton +3 (4-1)
New York: Powell +13 (54-41), Pierson +6 (53-47), Vaughn +13 (62-49), Pondexter +4 (64-60), Mitchell -1 (40-41), Carson +6 (49-43), Montgomery -10 (6-16), Hollingsworth -6 (12-18), Braxton -5 (15-20)

Atlanta 92, Indiana 90
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 84, Atlanta 85
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .500, Atlanta .499
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 11, Atlanta 23
Points in the Paint: Indiana 34, Atlanta 48
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 11, Atlanta 13
Fast Break Points: Indiana 10, Atlanta 24
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 107.1, Atlanta 108.2
Effective FG%: Indiana .545, Atlanta .463
Turnover Pct: Indiana .226, Atlanta .106
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .259, Atlanta .258
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .273, Atlanta .225
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Catchings -10 (71-81), Smith +2 (52-50), Sutton-Brown -2 (67-69), Douglas -2 (70-72), Phillips -3 (77-80), Davenport +2 (35-33), Ely -4 (4-8), Bobbitt +1 (13-12), Zellous +4 (55-51), Pohlen +2 (6-4)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +9 (84-75), Lyttle +10 (83-73), de Souza -1 (51-52), Price +11 (71-60), Harding +5 (74-69), Bales -9 (12-21), Castro Marques 0 (41-41), Paris 0 (11-11), Miller -11 (27-38), Irvin -4 (6-10)

Minnesota 73, Washington 56
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 74, Minnesota 74
Rebound Percentage: Washington .449, Minnesota .551
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 13, Minnesota 19
Points in the Paint: Washington 24, Minnesota 46
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 4, Minnesota 14
Fast Break Points: Washington 8, Minnesota 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 75.7, Minnesota 98.6
Effective FG%: Washington .398, Minnesota .588
Turnover Pct: Washington .257, Minnesota .243
Offensive Reb%: Washington .138, Minnesota .240
Free Throw Rate: Washington .153, Minnesota .105
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Gardin -12 (36-48), Langhorne -20 (44-64), Walker -14 (22-36), Ajavon -20 (42-62), Thomas -15 (54-69), Anosike -6 (38-44), Miller -1 (21-22), Coleman -3 (15-18), Dunlap +6 (8-2)
Minnesota: Moore +10 (46-36), Brunson +8 (43-35), McWilliams-Franklin +14 (47-33), Augustus +5 (37-32), Whalen +16 (47-31), Wiggins +17 (40-23), Adair +9 (30-21), Harris +3 (26-23), Wright +8 (33-25), Hornbuckle -1 (11-12), Houston -4 (5-9)

San Antonio 78, Connecticut 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 83, San Antonio 83
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .479, San Antonio .520
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 10, San Antonio 15
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 34, San Antonio 32
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 5, San Antonio 7
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 8, San Antonio 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 79.5, San Antonio 94.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .406, San Antonio .463
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .169, San Antonio .181
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .135, San Antonio .176
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .219, San Antonio .239
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: McCray -10 (12-22), Jones -17 (51-68), Charles -14 (58-72), Greene -20 (18-38), Montgomery -12 (48-60), Lawson +1 (50-49), White -2 (52-54), Griffin +5 (15-10), Hightower +7 (18-11), Moore +2 (8-6)
San Antonio: Perkins +11 (65-54), Young +14 (76-62), Riley +2 (42-40), Hammon +18 (72-54), D.Robinson +19 (61-42), Adams -4 (25-29), Appel +14 (22-8), Bevilaqua -7 (17-24), Phillips -4 (4-8), Hodges -3 (6-9)

Phoenix 96, Tulsa 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 80, Tulsa 79
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .516, Tulsa .483
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 9, Tulsa 10
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 36, Tulsa 36
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 5, Tulsa 7
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 15, Tulsa 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 120.0, Tulsa 93.7
Effective FG%: Phoenix .629, Tulsa .404
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .150, Tulsa .152
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .200, Tulsa .167
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .397, Tulsa .279
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +22 (80-58), Dupree +25 (81-56), Sanford +25 (58-33), Taurasi +20 (56-36), Johnson +20 (60-40), Ferdinand-Harris +1 (31-30), Swanier +3 (29-26), Thomas -1 (36-37), Spencer -1 (24-25), Gray-Lawson -4 (25-29)
Tulsa: Swoopes -16 (60-76), Lacy -10 (26-36), Jackson -29 (32-61), Holt -23 (38-61), Latta -6 (59-65), Cambage -7 (36-43), Pedersen -4 (55-59), Riley -16 (15-31), Olajuwon -6 (13-19), Christmas +7 (36-29)

Los Angeles 68, Seattle 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 66, Los Angeles 66
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .646, Los Angeles .354
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 14, Los Angeles 20
Points in the Paint: Seattle 28, Los Angeles 26
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 16, Los Angeles 7
Fast Break Points: Seattle 0, Los Angeles 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 93.9, Los Angeles 103.0
Effective FG%: Seattle .440, Los Angeles .529
Turnover Pct: Seattle .288, Los Angeles .212
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .484, Los Angeles .192
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .190, Los Angeles .250
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Cash -8 (46-54), Little -1 (43-44), Jackson +10 (49-39), Wright -10 (41-51), Bird +2 (55-53), Smith -5 (37-42), Robinson -15 (11-26), Willingham -3 (28-31)
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones +6 (38-32), Thompson -6 (53-59), Parker +8 (66-58), Toliver +4 (54-50), Penicheiro -1 (52-53), Hoffman +10 (47-37), Quinn +9 (30-21)

Advertisements

Margins

2011 WNBA Season

Through August 28

10+ Point Deficits Overcome to Win:
24 (27-51, 8:45/3rd) — Washington 89, @ Los Angeles 85 OT (July 17)
18 (49-67, 0:32/3rd) — @ New York 84, Connecticut 81 OT (Aug. 18)
18 (18-36, 4:21/2nd) — @ Phoenix 81, Seattle 79 (Aug. 16)
18 (37-55, 6:50/3rd) — Los Angeles 79, @ Tulsa 74 (July 15)
17 (18-35, 6:50/2nd) — @ New York 80, Chicago 73 (July 10)
16 (9-25, 2:54/1st) — @ Los Angeles 93, Phoenix 90 OT (Aug. 12)
16 (35-51, 1:35/2nd) — San Antonio 101, @ Phoenix 99 (June 17)
15 (33-48, 7:52/3rd) — @ Tulsa 83, Connecticut 72 (Aug. 28)
15 (32-47, 8:46/3rd) — Los Angeles 73, @ Tulsa 67 (Aug. 21)
15 (20-35, 8:01/2nd) — @ Phoenix 97, Chicago 84 (July 1)
15 (14-29, 7:42/2nd) — Seattle 82, @ Tulsa 77 (June 21)
14 (12-26, 1:02/1st) — @ Connecticut 96, Atlanta 87 (Aug. 21)
14 (36-50, 0:49/2nd) — @ Atlanta 94, Connecticut 88 OT (Aug. 19)
14 (41-55, 9:10/3rd) — @ Phoenix 93, Indiana 89 OT (June 19)
14 (52-66, 4:02/3rd) — Indiana 86, @ New York 80 (June 11)
13 (21-34, 4:54/2nd) — @ Washington 64, New York 63 (Aug. 12)
13 (22-35, 4:43/2nd) — @ Chicago 81, Atlanta 69 (July 9)
13 (21-34, 6:22/2nd) — @ Atlanta 87, New York 81 (June 30)
12 (4-16, 4:19/1st) — @ Los Angeles 75, Indiana 70 (Aug. 18)
12 (10-22, 7:35/2nd) — @ New York 59, Chicago 49 (Aug. 4)
12 (30-42, 10:00/3rd) — Minnesota 70, @ San Antonio 69 (July 31)
12 (8-20, 5:04/1st) — @ San Antonio 90, Los Angeles 80 OT (June 24)
11 (59-70, 1:35/3rd) — @ Connecticut 95, Phoenix 92 (Aug. 26)
11 (18-29, 9:29/2nd) — Seattle 83, @ Phoenix 77 (July 26)
11 (80-91, 6:31/4th) — Phoenix 112, @ Minnesota 105 (July 13)
11 (20-31, 4:47/2nd) — @ Indiana 68, Washington 57 (July 9)
11 (13-24, 10:00/2nd) — Indiana 89, @ Washington 80 (June 21)
11 (56-67, 2:50/3rd) — Washington 98, @ Atlanta 90 OT (June 9)
10 (16-26, 1:43/1st) — Tulsa 77, @ Los Angeles 75 (Aug. 26)
10 (10-20, 2:05/1st) — @ Minnesota 87, Los Angeles 68 (Aug. 20)
10 (7-17, 4:31/1st) — Minnesota 79, @ Chicago 76 (Aug. 12)
10 (59-69, 0:43/3rd) — @ Connecticut 99, Atlanta 92 (July 31)
10 (15-25, 6:48/2nd) — Connecticut 77, @ Chicago 66 (July 26)
10 (44-54, 8:33/3rd) — @ Phoenix 101, Los Angeles 82 (July 5)
10 (28-38, 9:43/3rd) — @ San Antonio 86, Atlanta 74 (June 11)
10 (40-50, 6:43/3rd) — @ Los Angeles 82, Minnesota 74 (June 3)

20+ Point Victories:
39 — @ Phoenix 102, Tulsa 63 (July 10)
35 — @ Indiana 98, Los Angeles 63 (July 31)
32 — @ Indiana 83, Washington 51 (Aug. 21)
31 — @ New York 88, Tulsa 57 (July 17)
31 — San Antonio 93, @ Tulsa 62 (June 10)
30 — Minnesota 101, @ Tulsa 71 (June 30)
29 — @ Connecticut 108, Minnesota 79 (Aug. 16)
29 — Atlanta 92, @ Seattle 63 (Aug. 13)
28 — @ Minnesota 82, Tulsa 54 (Aug. 14)
25 — @ Minnesota 92, Seattle 67 (July 29)
24 — @ Los Angeles 74, Seattle 50 (June 19)
23 — @ Minnesota 90, Connecticut 67 (July 9)
22 — @ New York 91, Atlanta 69 (July 13)
21 — Atlanta 79, @ New York 58 (June 14)
20 — Indiana 85, @ Tulsa 65 (Aug. 5)
20 — @ Washington 83, Tulsa 63 (June 26)
20 — @ San Antonio 93, Tulsa 73 (June 4)

One-Point Victories:
@ Chicago 74, New York 73 (Aug. 28)
@ Seattle 63, New York 62 (Aug. 20)
Chicago 71, @ Washington 70 (Aug. 20)
@ Washington 64, New York 63 (Aug. 12)
Connecticut 96, @ Phoenix 95 OT (Aug. 7)
Minnesota 70, @ San Antonio 69 (July 31)
New York 81, @ Indiana 80 (June 10)

Game-Winning Buzzer-Beaters:
Sheryl Swoopes (:02.9) — Tulsa 77, @ Los Angeles 75 (Aug. 26)
Sancho Lyttle (:00.9) — Atlanta 72, @ Washington 70 (Aug. 9)
Tina Charles (:05.0) — Connecticut 96, @ Phoenix 95 OT (Aug. 7)
Sue Bird (:00.4) — @ Seattle 81, Connecticut 79 (Aug. 5)
Taj McWilliams-Franklin (:01.3) — @ Minnesota 62, San Antonio 60 (Aug. 4)
Lindsay Whalen (:01.5) — Minnesota 70, @ San Antonio 69 (July 31)
Shannon Bobbitt (:00.4) — Indiana 61, @ Washington 59 (July 29)

Records in Two-Possession Games
(Decided by 6 Points or Fewer):

7-2 (.778) — Atlanta
5-2 (.714) — Minnesota
8-6 (.571) — Los Angeles
9-7 (.563) — New York
5-4 (.556) — Seattle
6-5 (.545) — Indiana
6-6 (.500) — Connecticut
4-4 (.500) — Chicago
4-6 (.400) — San Antonio
4-7 (.364) — Phoenix
2-7 (.222) — Washington
1-5 (.167) — Tulsa

Records in Double-Figure Games
(Decided by 10 Points or More):

15-2 (.882) — Minnesota
10-4 (.714) — Indiana
9-5 (.643) — Seattle
5-3 (.625) — Phoenix
6-4 (.600) — New York
6-5 (.545) — Connecticut
8-7 (.533) — San Antonio
7-7 (.500) — Chicago
4-7 (.364) — Atlanta
3-9 (.250) — Los Angeles
2-9 (.182) — Washington
2-15 (.118) — Tulsa

Inside the Box Score: August 28

Minnesota 72, San Antonio 61
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 73, San Antonio 73
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .614, San Antonio .386
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 8, San Antonio 6
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 30, San Antonio 4
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 7, San Antonio 2
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 14, San Antonio 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 98.6, San Antonio 83.6
Effective FG%: Minnesota .449, San Antonio .389
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .151, San Antonio .110
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .364, San Antonio .136
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .145, San Antonio .190
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore +19 (65-46), Brunson +8 (48-40), McWilliams-Franklin +14 (60-46), Augustus +14 (62-48), Whalen +3 (50-47), Wiggins +1 (29-28), Adair +3 (24-21), Wright -4 (10-14), Harris -3 (12-15), Hornbuckle 0 (0-0)
San Antonio: S.Robinson +2 (17-15), Young -16 (42-58), Riley -1 (21-22), Hammon -9 (57-66), D.Robinson -7 (26-33), Adams -6 (30-36), Perkins -13 (32-45), Hodges -5 (28-33), Bevilaqua -1 (23-24), Appel 0 (16-16), Phillips +1 (13-12)

Tulsa 83, Connecticut 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 71, Tulsa 72
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .558, Tulsa .441
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 18, Tulsa 9
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 42, Tulsa 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 10, Tulsa 0
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 14, Tulsa 1
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 101.4, Tulsa 115.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .445, Tulsa .625
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .085, Tulsa .181
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .325, Tulsa .208
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .096, Tulsa .232
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: McCray +17 (36-19), Jones +2 (58-56), Charles +2 (61-59), Greene +11 (56-45), Montgomery -2 (60-62), White -27 (16-43), Lawson -23 (36-59), Griffin -13 (14-27), Hightower -9 (12-21), Moore -13 (11-24)
Tulsa: Swoopes +11 (73-62), Lacy -1 (50-51), Jackson +11 (83-72), Holt 0 (63-63), Latta +11 (77-66), Olajuwon +12 (19-7), Pedersen +6 (10-4), Christmas +11 (30-19), Riley 0 (6-6), Cambage -6 (4-10)

Phoenix 86, Washington 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 79, Washington 80
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .461, Washington .538
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 11, Washington 14
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 30, Washington 42
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 4, Washington 14
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 11, Washington 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 108.9, Washington 98.8
Effective FG%: Phoenix .531, Washington .455
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .165, Washington .113
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .233, Washington .310
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .281, Washington .117
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Taylor +16 (47-31), Dupree +13 (73-60), Sanford +15 (52-37), Taurasi +26 (73-47), Johnson +15 (67-52), Swanier -8 (19-27), Ferdinand-Harris -13 (38-51), Bonner -10 (38-48), Thomas -4 (9-13), Gray-Lawson -15 (14-29)
Washington: Coleman -19 (42-61), Langhorne -11 (71-82), Anosike -23 (9-32), Ajavon -10 (65-75), Miller -11 (22-33), Walker +13 (65-52), Thomas +9 (66-57), Gardin +15 (51-36), Dunlap +2 (4-2)

Chicago 74, New York 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 74, Chicago 73
Rebound Percentage: New York .570, Chicago .429
Points Off Turnovers: New York 23, Chicago 10
Points in the Paint: New York 32, Chicago 38
2nd-Chance Points: New York 9, Chicago 5
Fast Break Points: New York 9, Chicago 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 98.6, Chicago 101.4
Effective FG%: New York .435, Chicago .542
Turnover Pct: New York .135, Chicago .247
Offensive Reb%: New York .372, Chicago .231
Free Throw Rate: New York .078, Chicago .169
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Powell -3 (58-61), Pierson -8 (50-58), Vaughn +10 (57-47), Pondexter -4 (59-63), Mitchell -5 (39-44), Hollingsworth +4 (30-26), Braxton -8 (9-17), Carson +9 (42-33), Colson -2 (6-8), Montgomery +2 (15-13)
Chicago: Young -4 (54-58), Snow -1 (33-34), Fowles -1 (66-67), Thorn -5 (47-52), Canty 0 (45-45), Kraayeveld +10 (47-37), Prince +9 (49-40), Vandersloot +3 (27-24), Wisdom-Hylton -6 (2-8)

Seattle 65, Los Angeles 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 70, Seattle 69
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .522, Seattle .478
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 11, Seattle 20
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 28, Seattle 26
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 9, Seattle 7
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 5, Seattle 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 90.0, Seattle 94.2
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .458, Seattle .422
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .200, Seattle .116
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .233, Seattle .189
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .153, Seattle .276
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones +4 (45-41), Thompson +2 (50-48), Parker -4 (52-56), Toliver +3 (44-41), Penicheiro +7 (58-51), Hoffman -4 (29-33), O’Hea -9 (8-17), Quinn -5 (16-21), Lavender -4 (13-17)
Seattle: Cash -1 (55-56), Little +6 (63-57), Jackson +5 (43-38), Wright +4 (56-52), Bird +5 (58-53), Robinson +3 (20-17), Smith -2 (26-28), Willingham -10 (4-14)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 28) here.

Inside the Box Score: August 27

Atlanta 86, Indiana 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 76, Indiana 78
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .497, Indiana .503
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 13, Indiana 20
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 38, Indiana 40
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 11, Indiana 15
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 11, Indiana 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 113.2, Indiana 102.6
Effective FG%: Atlanta .567, Indiana .419
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .237, Indiana .103
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .345, Indiana .351
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .300, Indiana .243
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +10 (62-52), Lyttle +7 (72-65), de Souza +9 (65-56), Price -8 (54-62), Harding +6 (86-80), Castro Marques +8 (48-40), Bales -2 (17-19), Miller +2 (8-6), Paris -2 (18-20)
Indiana: Catchings -5 (63-68), Smith +5 (72-67), Sutton-Brown -5 (48-53), Douglas +1 (65-64), Phillips -2 (61-63), Davenport -4 (36-40), Pohlen -5 (3-8), Bobbitt -4 (19-23), Ely -7 (4-11), Zellous -4 (29-33)

Inside the Box Score: August 26

Connecticut 95, Phoenix 92
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 86, Connecticut 85
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .443, Connecticut .557
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 7, Connecticut 13
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 42, Connecticut 42
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 12, Connecticut 13
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 15, Connecticut 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 107.0, Connecticut 111.8
Effective FG%: Phoenix .562, Connecticut .475
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .174, Connecticut .106
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .212, Connecticut .326
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .137, Connecticut .238
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Taylor -6 (81-87), Dupree -5 (72-77), Sanford -7 (56-63), Taurasi -1 (76-77), Johnson -10 (57-67), Bonner +4 (48-44), Ferdinand-Harris +4 (14-10), Swanier +1 (27-26), Thomas +2 (8-6), Gray-Lawson +3 (21-18)
Connecticut: McCray -4 (39-43), Jones +11 (77-66), Charles +2 (76-74), Greene +2 (65-63), Montgomery +12 (87-75), Griffin -8 (28-36), Lawson +4 (58-54), White 0 (33-33), Moore -2 (6-8), Hightower -2 (6-8)

Minnesota 85, San Antonio 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 73, Minnesota 73
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .377, Minnesota .622
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 10, Minnesota 12
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 24, Minnesota 42
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 11, Minnesota 22
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 10, Minnesota 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 102.7, Minnesota 116.4
Effective FG%: San Antonio .508, Minnesota .507
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .178, Minnesota .178
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .207, Minnesota .452
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .213, Minnesota .183
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: S.Robinson -9 (40-49), Young -13 (47-60), Riley -10 (27-37), Hammon -9 (50-59), D.Robinson -3 (56-59), Adams -3 (28-31), Perkins -11 (36-47), Bevilaqua -5 (25-30), Appel +1 (23-22), Phillips +3 (28-25), Hodges +9 (15-6)
Minnesota: Moore +12 (71-59), Brunson +17 (76-59), McWilliams-Franklin +17 (66-49), Augustus +16 (67-51), Whalen +23 (71-48), Adair -8 (16-24), Wiggins -8 (34-42), Wright -11 (18-29), Harris -4 (4-8), Hornbuckle -4 (2-6)

Chicago 80, Washington 67
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 76, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: Washington .567, Chicago .433
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 21, Chicago 14
Points in the Paint: Washington 24, Chicago 34
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 21, Chicago 13
Fast Break Points: Washington 13, Chicago 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 88.2, Chicago 103.9
Effective FG%: Washington .373, Chicago .550
Turnover Pct: Washington .184, Chicago .208
Offensive Reb%: Washington .326, Chicago .192
Free Throw Rate: Washington .197, Chicago .233
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Coleman -12 (52-64), Langhorne -12 (53-65), Anosike -13 (47-60), Ajavon -7 (48-55), Miller -15 (44-59), Gardin -1 (9-10), Thomas -4 (48-52), Walker -4 (31-35), Dunlap +3 (3-0)
Chicago: Young +2 (47-45), Snow +1 (42-41), Fowles +16 (47-31), Thorn +6 (55-49), Canty 0 (38-38), Swords +1 (20-19), Kraayeveld +18 (51-33), Vandersloot +18 (46-28), Prince +13 (54-41), Wisdom-Hylton -10 (0-10)

Tulsa 77, Los Angeles 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 72, Los Angeles 73
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .550, Los Angeles .450
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 8, Los Angeles 13
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 36, Los Angeles 36
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 12, Los Angeles 9
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 2, Los Angeles 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 106.9, Los Angeles 102.7
Effective FG%: Tulsa .515, Los Angeles .515
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .208, Los Angeles .178
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .400, Los Angeles .300
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .154, Los Angeles .090
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Swoopes -6 (66-72), Lacy -11 (45-56), Jackson +2 (77-75), Holt +3 (71-68), Latta +3 (61-58), Riley -1 (16-17), Cambage +9 (20-11), Christmas +7 (17-10), Olajuwon +4 (12-8)
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones +3 (62-59), Thompson +3 (62-59), Parker +10 (61-51), O’Hea +10 (51-41), Penicheiro +1 (64-63), Hoffman -19 (19-38), Toliver -4 (8-12), Lavender -5 (13-18), Quinn -5 (13-18), Lacy -4 (22-26)