Inside the Box Score: August 28

Tulsa 84, Atlanta 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 83, Atlanta 84
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .491, Atlanta .508
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 25, Atlanta 16
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 22, Atlanta 40
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 4, Atlanta 18
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 12, Atlanta 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 101.2, Atlanta 95.2
Effective FG%: Tulsa .523, Atlanta .444
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .217, Atlanta .214
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .286, Atlanta .303
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .246, Atlanta .222
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Holt +8 (31-23), G.Johnson -7 (63-70), Black -1 (29-30), Hodges +7 (67-60), T.Johnson +5 (68-63), Lacy +1 (57-56), Latta -7 (50-57), Williams +2 (26-24), Dorrell -1 (12-13), Paris +13 (17-4)
Atlanta: Hayes -8 (57-65), Lyttle -10 (62-72), de Souza -1 (64-65), Price +2 (67-65), Harding 0 (63-63), Kraayeveld +12 (57-45), Swanier -4 (17-21), Henry -6 (13-19), Koehn -5 (0-5)

Indiana 83, Washington 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 70, Indiana 71
Rebound Percentage: Washington .468, Indiana .531
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 12, Indiana 21
Points in the Paint: Washington 26, Indiana 30
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 16, Indiana 11
Fast Break Points: Washington 6, Indiana 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 97.1, Indiana 116.9
Effective FG%: Washington .542, Indiana .625
Turnover Pct: Washington .229, Indiana .197
Offensive Reb%: Washington .241, Indiana .304
Free Throw Rate: Washington .050, Indiana .232
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Currie -3 (22-25), Langhorne -12 (42-54), Snow -11 (30-41), Ajavon -12 (34-46), Thomas -10 (34-44), Bobbitt -5 (34-39), Robinson -1 (34-35), Quinn -7 (34-41), Castro Marques -4 (24-28), Wisdom-Hylton -6 (30-36), Novosel -4 (22-26)
Indiana: Douglas +16 (62-46), Catchings +10 (55-45), Sutton-Brown -1 (14-15), Zellous +19 (64-45), January +5 (52-47), Davenport +14 (46-32), Phillips +11 (50-39), Christmas -6 (8-14), Larkins +7 (38-31), Pohlen 0 (13-13), Goodlett 0 (13-13)

Connecticut 83, Chicago 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .487, Chicago .513
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 17, Chicago 20
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 26, Chicago 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 12, Chicago 14
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 13, Chicago 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 106.4, Chicago 93.5
Effective FG%: Connecticut .492, Chicago .400
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, Chicago .195
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .333, Chicago .359
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .333, Chicago .229
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene +10 (37-27), Griffin +11 (71-60), Charles +14 (73-59), Hightower 0 (55-55), Lawson +9 (70-61), White +9 (40-31), Montgomery +4 (49-45), Mims -2 (8-10), Moore 0 (12-12)
Chicago: Murphy -14 (26-40), Cash -16 (46-62), Swords +4 (61-57), Prince -3 (55-58), Penicheiro -8 (14-22), Vandersloot -2 (58-60), Riley -15 (11-26), Petrovic +3 (46-43), Young -1 (14-15), Willingham -3 (29-32)

Minnesota 96, San Antonio 84 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 86, Minnesota 85
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .366, Minnesota .633
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 14, Minnesota 12
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 46, Minnesota 44
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 11, Minnesota 29
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Minnesota 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 97.7, Minnesota 112.9
Effective FG%: San Antonio .442, Minnesota .467
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .093, Minnesota .141
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .175, Minnesota .442
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .208, Minnesota .109
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Christon -12 (33-45), Young -7 (76-83), Appel -3 (38-41), Hammon -9 (73-82), Robinson -6 (76-82), Perkins -5 (56-61), Adams -8 (29-37), Johnson -4 (16-20), Smith -3 (10-13), Morrison -3 (13-16)
Minnesota: Moore +15 (73-58), Brunson +12 (84-72), McWilliams-Franklin +6 (67-61), Augustus +9 (80-71), Whalen +13 (74-61), Wiggins +4 (45-41), Wright +2 (21-19), Harris +1 (24-23), Peters 0 (12-12), Thorn -2 (0-2)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: