Inside the Box Score: September 14

Minnesota 66, Indiana 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 67, Indiana 66
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .487, Indiana .512
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 8, Indiana 20
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 34, Indiana 40
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 7, Indiana 12
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Indiana 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 98.5, Indiana 97.0
Effective FG%: Minnesota .500, Indiana .403
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .254, Indiana .136
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .318, Indiana .343
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .179, Indiana .149
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore 0 (64-64), Brunson -3 (32-35), McWilliams-Franklin +10 (55-45), Wright +10 (37-27), Whalen 0 (50-50), Harris -6 (11-17), Wiggins -4 (47-51), Peters +3 (34-31)
Indiana: Douglas -7 (59-66), Catchings +2 (64-62), Sutton-Brown -3 (20-23), Zellous -6 (28-34), January +2 (64-62), Larkins +1 (44-43), Pohlen 0 (20-20), Phillips +5 (21-16), Davenport -4 (0-4)

Atlanta 82, Washington 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 78, Washington 79
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .376, Washington .623
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 18, Washington 13
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 32, Washington 32
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 8, Washington 25
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 8, Washington 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 105.1, Washington 93.7
Effective FG%: Atlanta .533, Washington .399
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .205, Washington .241
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .185, Washington .432
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .279, Washington .275
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +2 (70-68), Lyttle +17 (61-44), de Souza +15 (75-60), Price -6 (58-64), Harding -4 (60-64), Hayes +19 (29-10), Swanier +12 (22-10), Kraayeveld -8 (28-36), Henry -7 (7-14)
Washington: Currie -6 (64-70), Langhorne +8 (22-14), Robinson -3 (64-67), Ajavon -8 (56-64), Thomas +4 (66-62), Snow -9 (34-43), Bobbitt -12 (8-20), Wisdom-Hylton -10 (26-36), Novosel -1 (16-17), Castro Marques -3 (14-17)

San Antonio 90, Seattle 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 79, San Antonio 79
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .487, San Antonio .513
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 7, San Antonio 23
Points in the Paint: Seattle 32, San Antonio 24
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 6, San Antonio 11
Fast Break Points: Seattle 0, San Antonio 16
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 83.5, San Antonio 113.9
Effective FG%: Seattle .469, San Antonio .546
Turnover Pct: Seattle .266, San Antonio .139
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .200, San Antonio .226
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .094, San Antonio .292
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Abrosimova -12 (56-68), Little -24 (32-56), Wauters -8 (51-59), Smith -19 (49-68), Wright -16 (31-47), Stricklen -14 (50-64), Thompson +1 (32-31), Kobryn -14 (14-28), Clark -14 (15-29)
San Antonio: Christon +33 (73-40), Young +18 (70-52), Appel +17 (45-28), Hammon +20 (73-53), Robinson +7 (62-55), Adams +7 (45-38), Perkins -4 (33-37), Johnson +20 (41-21), Bevilaqua +1 (4-3), Morrison +1 (4-3)

Tulsa 92, Phoenix 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 81, Phoenix 82
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .436, Phoenix .564
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 25, Phoenix 12
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 40, Phoenix 46
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 8, Phoenix 13
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 8, Phoenix 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 113.6, Phoenix 102.4
Effective FG%: Tulsa .520, Phoenix .527
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .148, Phoenix .256
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .286, Phoenix .414
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .171, Phoenix .081
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Holt +10 (47-37), Pedersen +13 (48-35), G.Johnson +13 (79-66), Hodges +17 (75-58), T.Johnson -5 (40-45), Latta +5 (58-53), Williams +7 (55-48), Lacy -8 (12-20), Black -2 (22-24), Paris -7 (4-11), Dorrell -3 (20-23)
Phoenix: Houston -8 (47-55), Sanford 0 (55-55), Thomas -16 (68-84), Gilbreath -15 (77-92), Hornbuckle +3 (65-62), Kizer 0 (45-45), Simon -4 (63-67)

Los Angeles 93, Connecticut 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 86, Los Angeles 86
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .541, Los Angeles .458
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 13, Los Angeles 22
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 32, Los Angeles 52
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 17, Los Angeles 6
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 10, Los Angeles 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 95.3, Los Angeles 108.1
Effective FG%: Connecticut .465, Los Angeles .544
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .244, Los Angeles .186
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .333, Los Angeles .250
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .208, Los Angeles .279
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene -7 (31-38), Mims -18 (42-60), Charles -10 (77-87), Hightower -9 (31-40), Lawson -12 (68-80), Montgomery -2 (51-53), White +7 (40-33), Griffin +2 (23-21), McCray -6 (47-53)
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones +16 (79-63), Ogwumike +8 (77-69), Parker +19 (81-62), Beard +8 (67-59), Toliver +16 (82-66), O’Hea -7 (23-30), Lavender -5 (21-26), Coleman 0 (28-28), Hoffman 0 (7-7)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: