Monthly Archives: May 2013

Inside the Box Score: May 31

Atlanta 86, Indiana 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 76, Indiana 77
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .543, Indiana .457
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 24, Indiana 16
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 48, Indiana 36
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 22, Indiana 4
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 10, Indiana 17
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 113.2, Indiana 100.0
Effective FG%: Atlanta .529, Indiana .485
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .184, Indiana .195
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .400, Indiana .314
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .206, Indiana .197
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +4 (69-65), Lyttle +9 (71-62), de Souza -2 (45-47), Hayes +4 (59-55), Thomas +12 (64-52), Bentley +5 (52-47), Henry +9 (39-30), Clements +4 (16-12), Willingham 0 (15-15)
Indiana: Douglas -6 (73-79), Catchings -6 (65-71), Larkins -6 (64-70), Zellous -3 (59-62), January -3 (67-70), Clarendon -10 (24-34), Breland +3 (19-16), Goodlett -3 (6-9), Christmas -11 (8-19)

New York 78, Tulsa 76 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 84, New York 85
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .539, New York .461
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 15, New York 16
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 22, New York 44
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 20, New York 14
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 2, New York 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 90.5, New York 91.8
Effective FG%: Tulsa .347, New York .537
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .226, New York .282
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .422, New York .344
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .320, New York .074
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Hodges -6 (46-52), Johnson 0 (55-55), Cambage -4 (43-47), Wiggins -3 (69-72), Diggins +2 (73-71), Pedersen +2 (33-31), Powell +1 (40-39), Lacy -2 (21-23)
New York: Carson -2 (58-60), Pierson +2 (50-48), Braxton -4 (48-52), Williams +2 (34-32), Pondexter 0 (68-68), Bone +3 (38-35), Mitchell -5 (10-15), Young +1 (14-13), Montgomery +3 (32-29), Smith +10 (38-28)

Chicago 86, Connecticut 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 77, Chicago 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .430, Chicago .569
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 12, Chicago 2
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 38, Chicago 42
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, Chicago 15
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 17, Chicago 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 97.4, Chicago 110.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .429, Chicago .486
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .078, Chicago .167
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .273, Chicago .412
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .024, Chicago .257
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene -21 (40-61), Griffin -8 (43-51), Charles -14 (65-79), Hightower -12 (63-75), Lawson -22 (44-66), Montgomery +11 (31-20), Bass -3 (21-24), Walker +3 (21-18), White +6 (34-28), Lacy +3 (5-2), Faris +2 (8-6)
Chicago: Cash +12 (55-43), Delle Donne +15 (75-60), Fowles +13 (78-65), Prince +18 (78-60), Vandersloot +18 (77-59), Young -6 (26-32), Murphy -6 (3-9), Swords -2 (8-10), Zoll-Norman -5 (7-12), Quigley -1 (15-16), Campbell -1 (8-9)

Advertisements

Inside the Box Score: May 27

Washington 95, Tulsa 90 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 91, Tulsa 91
Rebound Percentage: Washington .478, Tulsa .522
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 18, Tulsa 11
Points in the Paint: Washington 28, Tulsa 34
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 8, Tulsa 13
Fast Break Points: Washington 14, Tulsa 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 104.4, Tulsa 98.9
Effective FG%: Washington .515, Tulsa .486
Turnover Pct: Washington .165, Tulsa .187
Offensive Reb%: Washington .206, Tulsa .250
Free Throw Rate: Washington .388, Tulsa .243
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Currie +1 (62-61), Langhorne 0 (74-74), Vaughn +2 (58-56), Hill -4 (47-51), Latta +5 (85-80), Meesseman +5 (28-23), Ajavon +9 (58-49), Ruffin-Pratt +6 (35-29), Snow +1 (28-27)
Tulsa: Hodges 0 (69-69), Johnson -3 (78-81), Cambage -1 (61-62), Diggins +3 (86-83), Goodrich -2 (67-69), Pedersen -4 (29-33), Lacy -4 (25-29), Williams -14 (35-49)

Chicago 102, Phoenix 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 82, Phoenix 84
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .585, Phoenix .414
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 21, Phoenix 9
Points in the Paint: Chicago 38, Phoenix 34
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 18, Phoenix 15
Fast Break Points: Chicago 14, Phoenix 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 124.4, Phoenix 95.2
Effective FG%: Chicago .562, Phoenix .456
Turnover Pct: Chicago .159, Phoenix .167
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .371, Phoenix .200
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .274, Phoenix .265
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Cash +18 (63-45), Delle Donne +23 (89-66), Fowles +9 (53-44), Prince +27 (89-62), Vandersloot +24 (77-53), Swords +13 (49-36), Young +5 (39-34), Zoll-Norman -2 (25-27), Murphy -3 (7-10), Campbell -2 (13-15), Quigley -2 (6-8)
Phoenix: Bonner -11 (57-68), Dupree -23 (72-95), Griner -4 (56-60), Taurasi -23 (67-90), Prahalis -9 (61-70), Hornbuckle -13 (17-30), Houston -13 (30-43), Thomas -18 (24-42), Gilbreath +2 (8-6), Kizer +2 (8-6)

Inside the Box Score: May 26

Los Angeles 102, Seattle 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 78, Los Angeles 77
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .500, Los Angeles .500
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 7, Los Angeles 15
Points in the Paint: Seattle 34, Los Angeles 30
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 15, Los Angeles 4
Fast Break Points: Seattle 1, Los Angeles 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 88.5, Los Angeles 132.5
Effective FG%: Seattle .428, Los Angeles .672
Turnover Pct: Seattle .154, Los Angeles .117
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .250, Los Angeles .250
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .145, Los Angeles .414
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Quinn -25 (52-77), Thompson -19 (27-46), Little -18 (32-50), Wright -17 (41-58), Johnson -28 (46-74), Hawkins -17 (40-57), Sanford -16 (27-43), Stricklen -19 (50-69), Bravard +2 (15-13), Clark -8 (15-23)
Los Angeles: Beard +14 (54-40), Ogwumike +33 (70-37), Parker +14 (54-40), Toliver +34 (75-41), Harding +14 (54-40), Abdi +13 (41-28), Coleman +16 (30-14), Hoffman +19 (48-29), O’Hea +4 (29-25), Lavender 0 (32-32), Mathies +4 (23-19)

Inside the Box Score: May 25

Atlanta 98, Tulsa 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 86, Atlanta 87
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .442, Atlanta .558
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 20, Atlanta 25
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 34, Atlanta 58
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 9, Atlanta 8
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 14, Atlanta 24
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 94.2, Atlanta 112.6
Effective FG%: Tulsa .414, Atlanta .549
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .256, Atlanta .172
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .237, Atlanta .353
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .438, Atlanta .264
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Hodges -23 (47-70), Pedersen -5 (41-46), Johnson -14 (67-81), Wiggins +1 (36-35), Diggins -21 (62-83), Cambage -4 (40-44), Williams -10 (69-79), Lacy -11 (14-25), Goodrich +2 (29-27)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +1 (57-56), Lyttle +18 (73-55), de Souza +5 (40-35), Herrington +21 (81-60), Thomas +3 (46-43), Bentley +14 (52-38), Hayes +13 (52-39), Henry +16 (50-34), Willingham -3 (30-33), Clements -1 (6-7), Armstrong -2 (3-5)

Connecticut 81, New York 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 82, Connecticut 83
Rebound Percentage: New York .448, Connecticut .552
Points Off Turnovers: New York 15, Connecticut 17
Points in the Paint: New York 30, Connecticut 16
2nd-Chance Points: New York 8, Connecticut 13
Fast Break Points: New York 8, Connecticut 20
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 84.1, Connecticut 97.6
Effective FG%: New York .415, Connecticut .462
Turnover Pct: New York .220, Connecticut .157
Offensive Reb%: New York .222, Connecticut .326
Free Throw Rate: New York .141, Connecticut .115
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Carson -16 (52-68), Young -18 (16-34), Braxton -4 (42-46), Pondexter -4 (63-67), Mitchell -6 (31-37), Smith +10 (40-30), Bone -7 (41-48), Williams -6 (38-44), Montgomery -9 (22-31)
Connecticut: Greene +13 (61-48), Griffin +17 (54-37), Charles +9 (74-65), Hightower +19 (66-47), Lawson +12 (68-56), Montgomery -3 (15-18), White -7 (15-22), Bass -2 (16-18), Faris +2 (18-16), Walker 0 (18-18)

Inside the Box Score: May 24

Indiana 79, San Antonio 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 73, San Antonio 73
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .512, San Antonio .487
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 21, San Antonio 14
Points in the Paint: Indiana 46, San Antonio 16
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 11, San Antonio 13
Fast Break Points: Indiana 8, San Antonio 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 108.2, San Antonio 87.7
Effective FG%: Indiana .531, San Antonio .434
Turnover Pct: Indiana .219, San Antonio .247
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .407, San Antonio .382
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .154, San Antonio .180
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Douglas +19 (71-52), Catchings +10 (61-51), Larkins +17 (54-37), Zellous +12 (63-51), January +13 (64-51), Christmas +6 (39-33), Breland +4 (22-18), Goodlett -1 (17-18), Hassell -5 (4-9)
San Antonio: Christon -13 (44-57), Milton-Jones -9 (37-46), Appel -9 (26-35), Perkins -14 (37-51), Robinson -8 (58-66), Adams -4 (35-39), Johnson -11 (41-52), Alexander -3 (25-28), Whyte -4 (17-21)