Inside the Box Score: September 15

Connecticut 82, Indiana 80 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 76, Connecticut 74
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .488, Connecticut .512
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 22, Connecticut 16
Points in the Paint: Indiana 46, Connecticut 42
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 16, Connecticut 21
Fast Break Points: Indiana 11, Connecticut 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 105.3, Connecticut 110.8
Effective FG%: Indiana .438, Connecticut .493
Turnover Pct: Indiana .171, Connecticut .230
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .462, Connecticut .486
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .219, Connecticut .186
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Douglas -8 (68-76), Christmas +5 (74-69), Larkins -10 (43-53), Clarendon +2 (74-72), Phillips -3 (37-40), Pohlen +3 (61-58), Hassell +1 (43-42)
Connecticut: Greene +4 (77-73), Griffin -1 (67-68), Bass -1 (68-69), Castro Marques 0 (58-58), Montgomery +11 (77-66), Carter -9 (34-43), Pedersen +6 (29-23)

Washington 70, New York 52
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 78, Washington 77
Rebound Percentage: New York .513, Washington .487
Points Off Turnovers: New York 8, Washington 11
Points in the Paint: New York 28, Washington 26
2nd-Chance Points: New York 7, Washington 10
Fast Break Points: New York 6, Washington 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 66.7, Washington 90.9
Effective FG%: New York .336, Washington .401
Turnover Pct: New York .179, Washington .104
Offensive Reb%: New York .222, Washington .196
Free Throw Rate: New York .071, Washington .183
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Young -11 (22-33), Pierson -16 (33-49), Braxton -8 (25-33), Smith -6 (38-44), Mitchell -10 (40-50), Bone -10 (27-37), Milton-Jones -10 (25-35), Montgomery -7 (34-41), Williams -12 (16-28)
Washington: Currie +10 (40-30), Langhorne -2 (19-21), Vaughn +6 (37-31), Ajavon -5 (11-16), Latta +7 (39-32), Hill +23 (59-36), Ruffin-Pratt +8 (30-22), Snow +10 (29-19), McKenith +11 (31-20), Meesseman +20 (51-31), Hollingsworth +2 (4-2)

San Antonio 97, Atlanta 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 78, San Antonio 78
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .490, San Antonio .509
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 5, San Antonio 24
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 24, San Antonio 44
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 17, San Antonio 14
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 5, San Antonio 18
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 87.2, San Antonio 124.4
Effective FG%: Atlanta .426, San Antonio .526
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .192, San Antonio .077
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .297, San Antonio .316
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .147, San Antonio .192
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +2 (17-15), Willingham -22 (49-71), de Souza -16 (22-38), Hayes -11 (24-35), Thomas -28 (52-80), Clements -29 (45-74), Henry -13 (35-48), Riley -8 (43-51), Bentley -20 (53-73)
San Antonio: Christon +20 (79-59), Adams +34 (76-42), Appel +27 (66-39), Johnson +18 (76-58), Perkins +33 (72-39), Kraayeveld +5 (43-38), Alexander +5 (41-36), Hopkins +3 (32-29)

Los Angeles 89, Phoenix 55
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 80, Los Angeles 79
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .459, Los Angeles .540
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 8, Los Angeles 24
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 30, Los Angeles 36
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 14, Los Angeles 16
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 4, Los Angeles 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 68.8, Los Angeles 112.7
Effective FG%: Phoenix .362, Los Angeles .493
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .263, Los Angeles .139
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .324, Los Angeles .405
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .224, Los Angeles .184
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Taylor -19 (21-40), Bonner -23 (28-51), Griner -22 (26-48), Gilbreath -22 (31-53), Taurasi -15 (22-37), Kizer -11 (27-38), Hornbuckle -16 (25-41), Thomas -12 (29-41), James -18 (42-60), Houston -12 (24-36)
Los Angeles: Beard +8 (17-9), Ogwumike +33 (57-24), Parker +23 (47-24), Toliver +24 (43-19), Harding +25 (58-33), Coleman +26 (47-21), Lavender +11 (42-31), O’Hea +19 (61-42), Hoffman +1 (32-31), Mathies +2 (27-25), Abdi -2 (14-16)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: