Inside the Box Score: June 13

Washington 79, Chicago 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 80, Washington 80
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .494, Washington .505
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 14, Washington 16
Points in the Paint: Chicago 28, Washington 50
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 10, Washington 6
Fast Break Points: Chicago 11, Washington 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 85.0, Washington 98.8
Effective FG%: Chicago .412, Washington .493
Turnover Pct: Chicago .175, Washington .175
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .278, Washington .289
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .176, Washington .143
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -11 (48-59), Brandon -4 (30-34), Goodlett -13 (58-71), Prince -7 (47-54), Vandersloot -16 (40-56), Gatling +2 (8-6), Quigley -3 (60-63), Clements -8 (21-29), Faulkner +5 (28-23)
Washington: Currie +6 (39-33), Meesseman +8 (57-49), Vaughn +9 (35-26), Latta +6 (40-34), Hartley +9 (54-45), Dolson -5 (21-26), Lawson +7 (61-54), Ruffin-Pratt +6 (41-35), Hawkins +7 (32-25), Milovanovic +1 (11-10), Greene +1 (4-3)

Atlanta 85, Minnesota 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 80, Atlanta 80
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .470, Atlanta .530
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 17, Atlanta 15
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 22, Atlanta 28
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 9, Atlanta 14
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Atlanta 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 102.5, Atlanta 106.3
Effective FG%: Minnesota .463, Atlanta .486
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .163, Atlanta .188
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .281, Atlanta .341
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .299, Atlanta .225
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: M.Moore +12 (76-64), Dantas -9 (53-62), McCarville +12 (60-48), Augustus -3 (75-78), Whalen +4 (69-65), L.Moore -8 (10-18), Peters -12 (15-27), White -20 (16-36), Taylor -1 (11-12), Liston +10 (25-15)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +4 (81-77), Lyttle -9 (53-62), de Souza +2 (73-71), Hayes -5 (68-73), Thomas +1 (55-54), Schimmel +5 (12-7), Dumerc +4 (39-35), Henry +2 (10-8), Cash +11 (34-23)

Connecticut 83, New York 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 75, New York 75
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .459, New York .540
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 13, New York 6
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 22, New York 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, New York 8
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 12, New York 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 110.7, New York 100.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .542, New York .440
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .147, New York .147
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .222, New York .303
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .322, New York .239
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Thomas +10 (54-44), Ogwumike +6 (66-60), Bone +8 (45-37), Douglas +7 (78-71), Bentley +12 (56-44), McCray +8 (8-0), Griffin +1 (48-47), Montgomery -4 (27-31), Faris -9 (26-35), Pedersen +1 (7-6)
New York: Carson -4 (17-21), Pierson -10 (11-21), Charles -5 (72-77), Pondexter -7 (72-77), Cruz -9 (35-44), Milton-Jones -12 (15-27), Montgomery -8 (58-66), Rodgers +2 (43-41), McKinney -3 (3-6), Warley-Talbert +14 (49-35)

Seattle 79, San Antonio 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 74, San Antonio 74
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .383, San Antonio .616
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 10, San Antonio 16
Points in the Paint: Seattle 38, San Antonio 34
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 4, San Antonio 9
Fast Break Points: Seattle 6, San Antonio 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 106.8, San Antonio 97.3
Effective FG%: Seattle .612, San Antonio .437
Turnover Pct: Seattle .230, San Antonio .189
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .100, San Antonio .333
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .138, San Antonio .270
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark 0 (30-30), Langhorne +11 (42-31), Little +12 (75-63), Wright +4 (60-56), Bird +1 (44-43), Stricklen +7 (47-40), Johnson +9 (56-47), O’Hea -9 (41-50)
San Antonio: McBride 0 (49-49), Young-Malcolm -1 (61-62), Appel -11 (14-25), Hammon -10 (36-46), Robinson -5 (59-64), Perkins +3 (53-50), Adams +10 (55-45), Alexander -3 (14-17), Johnson -13 (16-29), Christon -5 (3-8)

Tulsa 69, Los Angeles 67
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 71, Tulsa 72
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .490, Tulsa .509
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 10, Tulsa 21
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 44, Tulsa 30
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 16, Tulsa 14
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 12, Tulsa 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 94.4, Tulsa 95.8
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .433, Tulsa .384
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .197, Tulsa .111
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .323, Tulsa .342
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .250, Tulsa .178
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Beard -5 (36-41), Ogwumike -4 (43-47), Parker -1 (53-54), Herrington +2 (45-43), Harding -2 (51-53), Abdi -2 (30-32), Lavender +2 (37-35), Gruda 0 (24-24), Prahalis 0 (16-16)
Tulsa: Hodges +1 (32-31), Johnson -4 (51-55), Paris +1 (54-53), Sims +3 (62-59), Diggins +1 (56-55), Hooper 0 (38-38), Baugh 0 (6-6), Plaisance +1 (9-8), Goodrich -1 (15-16), Lacy +8 (22-14)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: