Monthly Archives: July 2014

Inside the Box Score: July 29

Atlanta 89, Connecticut 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 82, Atlanta 84
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .469, Atlanta .530
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 13, Atlanta 16
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 46, Atlanta 56
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, Atlanta 16
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 4, Atlanta 20
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 97.6, Atlanta 106.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .436, Atlanta .507
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .146, Atlanta .167
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .262, Atlanta .323
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .154, Atlanta .257
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Thomas -18 (54-72), Ogwumike -10 (66-76), Bone -4 (72-76), Douglas -6 (58-64), Bentley -6 (59-65), Montgomery -2 (41-43), Griffin -4 (22-26), Faris +6 (26-20), Gilbreath-Butler -1 (2-3)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +12 (72-60), Lyttle +5 (80-75), de Souza +12 (63-51), Hayes +8 (80-72), Dumerc +14 (74-60), Henry +1 (35-34), Schimmel -6 (22-28), Thomas -1 (19-20)

New York 80, Washington 76 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 83, New York 82
Rebound Percentage: Washington .409, New York .591
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 16, New York 11
Points in the Paint: Washington 36, New York 32
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 9, New York 19
Fast Break Points: Washington 3, New York 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 91.6, New York 97.6
Effective FG%: Washington .479, New York .421
Turnover Pct: Washington .169, New York .159
Offensive Reb%: Washington .235, New York .417
Free Throw Rate: Washington .082, New York .134
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Currie -1 (58-59), Meesseman -6 (40-46), Vaughn +5 (66-61), Latta +4 (63-59), Hartley -6 (64-70), Dolson +2 (43-41), Lawson -1 (28-29), Hawkins -8 (3-11), Ruffin-Pratt -9 (15-24)
New York: Montgomery +3 (38-35), Warley-Talbert 0 (44-44), Charles +3 (69-66), Pondexter -3 (58-61), Cruz -1 (65-66), Cash +10 (23-13), Pierson +4 (46-42), Rodgers +7 (32-25), Lacy +5 (15-10), Houston -8 (10-18)

San Antonio 92, Chicago 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 77, San Antonio 77
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .442, San Antonio .558
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 10, San Antonio 11
Points in the Paint: Chicago 30, San Antonio 34
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 12, San Antonio 20
Fast Break Points: Chicago 15, San Antonio 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 96.1, San Antonio 119.5
Effective FG%: Chicago .435, San Antonio .560
Turnover Pct: Chicago .182, San Antonio .143
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .278, San Antonio .394
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .323, San Antonio .107
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -5 (56-61), Breland -14 (48-62), Fowles -12 (60-72), Prince -17 (62-79), Faulkner -1 (64-65), Brandon -8 (6-14), Clements -11 (20-31), Quigley -20 (28-48), Goodlett -6 (12-18), Gatling +4 (14-10)
San Antonio: McBride +13 (62-49), Young-Malcolm +8 (58-50), Appel +13 (64-51), Hammon +16 (65-49), Robinson +12 (78-66), Adams +14 (32-18), Johnson +16 (39-23), Alexander +5 (22-17), Perkins +1 (24-23), Christon -4 (8-12), Ndour -4 (8-12)

Tulsa 80, Seattle 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 80, Tulsa 79
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .402, Tulsa .598
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 15, Tulsa 22
Points in the Paint: Seattle 40, Tulsa 38
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 2, Tulsa 10
Fast Break Points: Seattle 2, Tulsa 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 92.5, Tulsa 101.3
Effective FG%: Seattle .500, Tulsa .500
Turnover Pct: Seattle .175, Tulsa .203
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .100, Tulsa .296
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .233, Tulsa .404
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Stricklen -2 (47-49), Langhorne -6 (61-67), Little +1 (64-63), Wright -3 (51-54), Bird -2 (68-70), Clark -2 (18-20), Johnson 0 (29-29), Powell -8 (4-12), Quinn -7 (0-7), Robinson +1 (7-6), O’Hea 0 (19-19), Rolle -2 (2-4)
Tulsa: Hodges +1 (58-57), Johnson +7 (75-68), Paris 0 (44-44), Sims +8 (75-67), Diggins +8 (75-67), Hooper +3 (27-24), Baugh +6 (36-30), Lacy -1 (5-6), Goodrich -2 (5-7)

Phoenix 90, Los Angeles 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 83, Phoenix 81
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .451, Phoenix .549
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 14, Phoenix 14
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 38, Phoenix 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 6, Phoenix 15
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 10, Phoenix 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 83.1, Phoenix 111.1
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .472, Phoenix .564
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .193, Phoenix .198
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .188, Phoenix .286
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .014, Phoenix .157
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Beard -6 (43-49), Ogwumike -18 (59-77), Lavender -20 (46-66), Herrington -16 (54-70), Toliver -23 (55-78), Gruda -6 (27-33), Wiggins -14 (29-43), Harding -6 (20-26), Abdi +2 (6-4), Greene +2 (6-4)
Phoenix: Bonner +11 (54-43), Dupree +29 (80-51), Griner +17 (58-41), Taylor +25 (57-32), Taurasi +17 (60-43), Bass -2 (38-40), Phillips 0 (30-30), Murphy +9 (48-39), Jekabsone-Zogota +3 (17-14), Bias -2 (4-6), Kobryn -2 (4-6)

Advertisements

Inside the Box Score: July 28

Los Angeles 77, Indiana 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 73, Los Angeles 74
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .453, Los Angeles .547
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 23, Los Angeles 24
Points in the Paint: Indiana 38, Los Angeles 36
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 13, Los Angeles 14
Fast Break Points: Indiana 4, Los Angeles 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 100.0, Los Angeles 104.1
Effective FG%: Indiana .516, Los Angeles .500
Turnover Pct: Indiana .233, Los Angeles .230
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .344, Los Angeles .438
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .164, Los Angeles .222
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman +4 (37-33), Catchings -4 (39-43), Larkins -5 (57-62), Zellous -1 (32-33), January -6 (52-58), Christmas -11 (45-56), Howard -3 (25-28), Clarendon +4 (44-40), Kizer +4 (25-21), Lucas -2 (9-11)
Los Angeles: Beard +6 (62-56), Ogwumike -2 (69-71), Lavender +2 (62-60), Herrington +4 (71-67), Toliver +2 (64-62), Wiggins 0 (34-34), Gruda +8 (23-15)

Inside the Box Score: July 27

Minnesota 76, Connecticut 65
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 75, Connecticut 73
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .508, Connecticut .491
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 7, Connecticut 11
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 32, Connecticut 34
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 13, Connecticut 13
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 5, Connecticut 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 101.3, Connecticut 89.0
Effective FG%: Minnesota .516, Connecticut .356
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .160, Connecticut .137
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .290, Connecticut .273
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .156, Connecticut .178
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: M.Moore +8 (62-54), Brunson +10 (53-43), McCarville +14 (58-44), Augustus +1 (51-50), Whalen +13 (52-39), White +11 (29-18), Wright 0 (28-28), Peters +3 (28-25), Dantas -5 (13-18), Liston 0 (6-6)
Connecticut: Thomas -7 (47-54), Ogwumike -4 (52-56), Bone -6 (56-62), Douglas -12 (54-66), Bentley -5 (41-46), Montgomery -10 (42-52), Pedersen -5 (11-16), Hoffman -7 (11-18), Faris +1 (11-10)

Washington 77, Atlanta 67
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 77, Washington 77
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .536, Washington .464
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 13, Washington 21
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 32, Washington 22
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 18, Washington 9
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 6, Washington 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 87.0, Washington 100.0
Effective FG%: Atlanta .387, Washington .517
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .195, Washington .208
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .341, Washington .269
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .120, Washington .271
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry -7 (53-60), Lyttle +1 (62-61), de Souza -9 (54-63), Hayes -4 (54-58), Thomas -4 (24-28), Schimmel -10 (24-34), Henry -12 (18-30), Dumerc +3 (37-34), Ajavon -8 (9-17)
Washington: Currie +2 (48-46), Meesseman +6 (58-52), Vaughn +11 (48-37), Latta +15 (74-59), Hartley -6 (23-29), Lawson +10 (58-48), Ruffin-Pratt +9 (30-21), Dolson -1 (29-30), Hawkins +4 (19-15)

Tulsa 79, Chicago 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 74, Tulsa 75
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .471, Tulsa .529
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 10, Tulsa 10
Points in the Paint: Chicago 36, Tulsa 32
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 10, Tulsa 18
Fast Break Points: Chicago 8, Tulsa 26
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 93.2, Tulsa 105.3
Effective FG%: Chicago .403, Tulsa .429
Turnover Pct: Chicago .176, Tulsa .160
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .306, Tulsa .364
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .153, Tulsa .397
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -15 (29-44), Breland -16 (55-71), Fowles -1 (49-50), Prince -14 (63-77), Faulkner -1 (44-45), Quigley -7 (45-52), Brandon +6 (14-8), Clements +7 (26-19), Goodlett -9 (20-29)
Tulsa: Hodges -4 (44-48), Johnson +11 (75-64), Paris -7 (41-48), Sims +16 (77-61), Diggins +7 (68-61), Lacy +1 (6-5), Hooper +19 (46-27), Plaisance -3 (7-10), Goodrich -6 (2-8), Williams -2 (0-2), Baugh +18 (29-11)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 27) here.

Inside the Box Score: July 26

Indiana 75, San Antonio 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 71, San Antonio 70
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .560, San Antonio .440
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 12, San Antonio 8
Points in the Paint: Indiana 34, San Antonio 24
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 22, San Antonio 8
Fast Break Points: Indiana 7, San Antonio 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 105.6, San Antonio 97.1
Effective FG%: Indiana .463, San Antonio .425
Turnover Pct: Indiana .127, San Antonio .214
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .406, San Antonio .286
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .194, San Antonio .434
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman -2 (43-45), Catchings -9 (23-32), Larkins +1 (42-41), Zellous +1 (46-45), January +1 (37-36), Howard +5 (31-26), Clarendon +6 (43-37), Kizer +6 (36-30), Christmas +21 (57-36), Lucas +1 (10-9), Thomas +4 (7-3)
San Antonio: McBride -8 (43-51), Young-Malcolm -1 (29-30), Appel -4 (50-54), Hammon +5 (54-49), Robinson -3 (50-53), Adams -9 (38-47), Johnson -18 (34-52), Alexander -1 (9-10), Christon 0 (26-26), Ndour +4 (7-3)

Phoenix 78, New York 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 79, Phoenix 78
Rebound Percentage: New York .554, Phoenix .446
Points Off Turnovers: New York 12, Phoenix 9
Points in the Paint: New York 32, Phoenix 28
2nd-Chance Points: New York 17, Phoenix 6
Fast Break Points: New York 7, Phoenix 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 79.7, Phoenix 100.0
Effective FG%: New York .331, Phoenix .558
Turnover Pct: New York .101, Phoenix .205
Offensive Reb%: New York .280, Phoenix .172
Free Throw Rate: New York .096, Phoenix .183
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Montgomery -10 (32-42), Warley-Talbert +4 (48-44), Charles -18 (51-69), Pondexter -12 (51-63), Cruz -9 (38-47), Cash -9 (27-36), Rodgers -20 (17-37), Pierson -19 (19-38), Carson +3 (8-5), Lacy +5 (8-3), McKinney +5 (8-3), Houston +5 (8-3)
Phoenix: Bonner +10 (50-40), Dupree +11 (58-47), Griner +20 (65-45), Taylor +13 (48-35), Taurasi +14 (60-46), Phillips +9 (30-21), Bass +8 (28-20), Murphy +5 (28-23), Jekabsone-Zogota -1 (15-16), Kobryn -9 (5-14), Bias -5 (3-8)

Los Angeles 77, Seattle 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 74, Seattle 75
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .524, Seattle .476
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 20, Seattle 13
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 36, Seattle 30
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 10, Seattle 8
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 6, Seattle 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 104.1, Seattle 92.0
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .517, Seattle .438
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .162, Seattle .187
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .267, Seattle .219
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .271, Seattle .203
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ogwumike +7 (54-47), Parker +7 (73-66), Lavender 0 (53-53), Beard +6 (64-58), Toliver +3 (60-57), Herrington +9 (53-44), Wiggins +9 (24-15), Gruda -1 (4-5)
Seattle: Stricklen -3 (33-36), Langhorne -4 (69-73), Little -7 (57-64), Wright +3 (61-58), Bird -7 (39-46), Clark -4 (8-12), Johnson -7 (35-42), Quinn -5 (5-10), O’Hea -1 (26-27), Robinson -6 (0-6), Powell +1 (12-11)

Inside the Box Score: July 25

Washington 82, Tulsa 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 84, Washington 83
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .534, Washington .465
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 20, Washington 13
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 46, Washington 22
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 12, Washington 11
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 11, Washington 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 91.7, Washington 98.8
Effective FG%: Tulsa .393, Washington .438
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .155, Washington .193
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .375, Washington .306
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .131, Washington .406
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Hodges -4 (28-32), Johnson +1 (69-68), Paris -9 (57-66), Sims -13 (65-78), Diggins +4 (70-66), Hooper -1 (49-50), Williams -4 (6-10), Baugh +2 (9-7), Lacy -7 (5-12), Plaisance +3 (14-11), Goodrich +3 (13-10)
Washington: Currie +13 (64-51), Meesseman +3 (58-55), Vaughn +1 (42-41), Latta +11 (66-55), Hartley -4 (51-55), Lawson 0 (43-43), Dolson +4 (40-36), Hawkins +2 (24-22), Ruffin-Pratt -5 (22-27)

Chicago 79, Atlanta 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 82, Atlanta 83
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .484, Atlanta .515
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 17, Atlanta 25
Points in the Paint: Chicago 32, Atlanta 32
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 11, Atlanta 16
Fast Break Points: Chicago 6, Atlanta 20
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 96.3, Atlanta 90.4
Effective FG%: Chicago .548, Atlanta .448
Turnover Pct: Chicago .317, Atlanta .253
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .292, Atlanta .323
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .423, Atlanta .224
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +12 (73-61), Breland +10 (61-51), Fowles +2 (61-59), Prince +4 (69-65), Faulkner +6 (14-8), Quigley -2 (65-67), Gatling +2 (18-16), Goodlett -6 (18-24), Clements -8 (16-24)
Atlanta: McCoughtry -2 (66-68), Lyttle +4 (63-59), de Souza -12 (60-72), Hayes -1 (54-55), Thomas -12 (16-28), Schimmel -1 (27-28), Dumerc +4 (42-38), Henry 0 (27-27), Ajavon 0 (20-20)

Minnesota 88, San Antonio 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 75, Minnesota 75
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .495, Minnesota .504
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 11, Minnesota 10
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 30, Minnesota 38
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 9, Minnesota 17
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 6, Minnesota 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 104.0, Minnesota 117.3
Effective FG%: San Antonio .493, Minnesota .553
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .133, Minnesota .147
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .250, Minnesota .259
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .053, Minnesota .227
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride 0 (63-63), Young-Malcolm -7 (59-66), Appel 0 (58-58), Hammon -6 (59-65), Robinson -7 (55-62), Adams -11 (26-37), Johnson -10 (37-47), Alexander -5 (8-13), Christon -7 (20-27), Ndour +3 (5-2)
Minnesota: M.Moore +5 (74-69), Brunson -5 (45-50), McCarville +3 (50-47), Augustus +6 (80-74), Whalen 0 (65-65), Peters +7 (38-31), White +3 (13-10), Wright +16 (32-16), Dantas +15 (43-28)