Inside the Box Score: July 5

San Antonio 71, Indiana 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 71, Indiana 72
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .426, Indiana .574
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 22, Indiana 9
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 24, Indiana 24
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 7, Indiana 6
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 4, Indiana 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 100.0, Indiana 97.2
Effective FG%: San Antonio .443, Indiana .460
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .197, Indiana .236
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .185, Indiana .333
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .279, Indiana .210
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride +10 (56-46), Adams +7 (43-36), Appel -5 (39-44), Hammon -24 (25-49), Robinson +5 (60-55), Young-Malcolm -2 (48-50), Johnson +14 (42-28), Christon -3 (21-24), Alexander +2 (12-10), Butler +1 (9-8)
Indiana: Coleman +10 (34-24), Catchings +10 (42-32), Larkins +10 (60-50), Zellous +6 (50-44), January -5 (60-65), Carter -2 (33-35), Howard -13 (34-47), Lucas -6 (2-8), Christmas -10 (31-41), Kizer -5 (4-9)

Atlanta 86, Washington 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 80, Atlanta 81
Rebound Percentage: Washington .486, Atlanta .514
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 10, Atlanta 17
Points in the Paint: Washington 26, Atlanta 42
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 6, Atlanta 16
Fast Break Points: Washington 7, Atlanta 18
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 91.3, Atlanta 106.2
Effective FG%: Washington .469, Atlanta .493
Turnover Pct: Washington .200, Atlanta .111
Offensive Reb%: Washington .258, Atlanta .286
Free Throw Rate: Washington .185, Atlanta .145
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Currie -14 (34-48), Meesseman -10 (52-62), Vaughn -12 (37-49), Latta -19 (57-76), Hartley -8 (52-60), Lawson -5 (53-58), Dolson -1 (36-37), Hawkins -3 (21-24), Ruffin-Pratt +7 (23-16)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +12 (59-47), Lyttle +7 (72-65), de Souza +12 (69-57), Hayes +12 (70-58), Thomas +11 (40-29), Schimmel +4 (45-41), Dumerc -1 (40-41), Henry +3 (19-16), Cash +5 (16-11)

Connecticut 78, Tulsa 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 77, Tulsa 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .560, Tulsa .440
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 13, Tulsa 19
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 36, Tulsa 40
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 18, Tulsa 8
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 8, Tulsa 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 101.3, Tulsa 97.4
Effective FG%: Connecticut .485, Tulsa .425
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .221, Tulsa .179
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .314, Tulsa .194
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .176, Tulsa .284
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Thomas +2 (68-66), Ogwumike -2 (52-54), Bone -7 (31-38), Douglas +10 (68-58), Bentley -4 (45-49), Griffin +3 (49-46), Montgomery +1 (48-47), Pedersen +10 (24-14), Faris -3 (5-8)
Tulsa: Hodges +4 (47-43), Johnson +3 (67-64), Paris 0 (60-60), Sims -5 (65-70), Diggins -1 (69-70), Lacy -5 (9-14), Hooper -6 (29-35), Baugh -2 (16-18), Goodrich +2 (18-16)

Seattle 80, Chicago 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 69, Seattle 68
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .649, Seattle .350
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 7, Seattle 12
Points in the Paint: Chicago 34, Seattle 26
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 15, Seattle 4
Fast Break Points: Chicago 7, Seattle 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 105.8, Seattle 117.6
Effective FG%: Chicago .468, Seattle .555
Turnover Pct: Chicago .159, Seattle .088
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .406, Seattle .107
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .222, Seattle .345
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -9 (36-45), Breland -3 (64-67), Goodlett -9 (4-13), Prince -5 (71-76), Faulkner -14 (59-73), Fowles +3 (60-57), Quigley +3 (45-42), Clements 0 (17-17), Gatling -1 (9-10)
Seattle: Clark +12 (39-27), Langhorne +13 (74-61), Little +4 (67-63), Wright +9 (61-52), Bird +9 (72-63), Stricklen 0 (32-32), Quinn -2 (19-21), Powell -3 (15-18), O’Hea -5 (9-14), Johnson -2 (8-10), Robinson 0 (4-4)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: