Inside the Box Score: June 6

Washington 67, New York 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 78, Washington 80
Rebound Percentage: New York .537, Washington .462
Points Off Turnovers: New York 6, Washington 10
Points in the Paint: New York 26, Washington 26
2nd-Chance Points: New York 6, Washington 2
Fast Break Points: New York 8, Washington 1
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 79.5, Washington 83.8
Effective FG%: New York .375, Washington .394
Turnover Pct: New York .231, Washington .113
Offensive Reb%: New York .229, Washington .154
Free Throw Rate: New York .283, Washington .155
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Carson -6 (12-18), Charles +2 (52-50), Stokes -4 (40-44), Wiggins +4 (33-29), Wright -12 (30-42), Cash -4 (37-41), Boyd -3 (25-28), Allen +1 (21-20), Rodgers 0 (36-36), Swords -6 (17-23), Warley-Talbert +3 (7-4)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +7 (46-39), Meesseman +6 (57-51), Dolson +1 (49-48), Lawson +1 (38-37), Latta +1 (40-39), Thornton 0 (21-21), Cloud +3 (26-23), Herrington -1 (22-23), Hill +4 (29-25), Malott +3 (7-4)

Minnesota 78, Indiana 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 78, Indiana 78
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .572, Indiana .427
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 5, Indiana 14
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 20, Indiana 32
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 20, Indiana 8
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Indiana 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 100.0, Indiana 88.5
Effective FG%: Minnesota .419, Indiana .455
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .192, Indiana .154
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .351, Indiana .206
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .419, Indiana .136
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore +10 (63-53), Brunson +4 (73-69), Dantas -1 (45-46), Augustus +3 (59-56), Whalen +15 (69-54), Liston +2 (29-27), Peters +2 (8-6), Gray +7 (15-8), O’Neill +3 (29-26)
Indiana: Coleman -13 (49-62), Howard -15 (41-56), Achonwa -7 (53-60), Clarendon -8 (45-53), January -3 (59-62), Johnson -5 (47-52), Kizer -7 (6-13), Lucas -5 (4-9), Pohlen -4 (2-6), Larkins +13 (24-11), Butler +9 (15-6)

Tulsa 101, Chicago 93
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 81, Tulsa 80
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .460, Tulsa .539
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 12, Tulsa 21
Points in the Paint: Chicago 32, Tulsa 42
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 10, Tulsa 18
Fast Break Points: Chicago 4, Tulsa 19
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 114.8, Tulsa 126.3
Effective FG%: Chicago .553, Tulsa .557
Turnover Pct: Chicago .185, Tulsa .188
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .296, Tulsa .375
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .303, Tulsa .329
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -13 (35-48), Delle Donne -4 (86-90), Goodlett -2 (59-61), Pondexter -6 (72-78), Vandersloot -10 (83-93), Parker -1 (26-27), Breland +3 (34-31), Quigley -1 (55-56), Faulkner +1 (4-3), Macaulay -4 (7-11), dos Santos -3 (4-7)
Tulsa: Christmas +5 (72-67), Pierson +5 (77-72), Paris +8 (77-69), Sims +5 (79-74), Diggins +9 (86-77), Kiesel +6 (14-8), Zahui B. +2 (29-27), Williams -4 (23-27), Baugh +1 (19-18), Hooper +3 (29-26)

Seattle 86, Los Angeles 61
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 73, Seattle 74
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .512, Seattle .488
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 6, Seattle 13
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 16, Seattle 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 4, Seattle 7
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 2, Seattle 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 83.6, Seattle 116.2
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .373, Seattle .586
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .137, Seattle .081
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .211, Seattle .188
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .164, Seattle .172
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Abdi -15 (34-49), Lavender -21 (56-77), Tolo -17 (20-37), Beard -19 (53-72), Phillips -18 (52-70), Johnson -12 (27-39), Lacy -8 (39-47), Hoover -11 (17-28), Hamson -4 (7-11)
Seattle: O’Hea +9 (37-28), Bishop +15 (36-21), Langhorne +21 (58-37), Loyd +20 (60-40), Bird +18 (60-42), Hollingsworth +4 (28-24), Montgomery +13 (42-29), Tokashiki +10 (50-40), Clark +16 (49-33), Mosqueda-Lewis -1 (10-11)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: