Inside the Box Score: June 30

Indiana 92, Connecticut 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 76, Connecticut 77
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .562, Connecticut .437
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 16, Connecticut 13
Points in the Paint: Indiana 32, Connecticut 38
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 13, Connecticut 5
Fast Break Points: Indiana 2, Connecticut 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 121.1, Connecticut 109.1
Effective FG%: Indiana .625, Connecticut .553
Turnover Pct: Indiana .250, Connecticut .156
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .333, Connecticut .208
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .393, Connecticut .167
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman +2 (58-56), Catchings +20 (66-46), Achonwa -4 (49-53), Johnson +4 (57-53), January +7 (67-60), Clarendon +5 (52-47), Kizer +6 (42-36), Howard -7 (24-31), Lucas +7 (45-38)
Connecticut: A.Thomas -2 (78-80), Little +3 (73-70), Bone -7 (61-68), Bentley -11 (74-85), J.Thomas +8 (69-61), Gray -16 (15-31), Williams -8 (7-15), Stricklen -6 (7-13), Pedersen -4 (27-31), Faris +3 (9-6)

New York 89, Chicago 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 77, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: New York .524, Chicago .476
Points Off Turnovers: New York 12, Chicago 14
Points in the Paint: New York 34, Chicago 28
2nd-Chance Points: New York 12, Chicago 15
Fast Break Points: New York 9, Chicago 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 115.6, Chicago 105.2
Effective FG%: New York .523, Chicago .430
Turnover Pct: New York .156, Chicago .104
Offensive Reb%: New York .273, Chicago .225
Free Throw Rate: New York .303, Chicago .282
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Carson -5 (66-71), Cash +10 (41-31), Charles +5 (80-75), Rodgers +1 (61-60), Wright -6 (56-62), Stokes +11 (71-60), Boyd +8 (22-14), Swords +3 (9-6), Wiggins +13 (39-26)
Chicago: Quigley +4 (55-51), Delle Donne -2 (81-83), Breland -3 (37-40), Pondexter -6 (75-81), Vandersloot +1 (71-70), dos Santos -4 (16-20), Laney -11 (25-36), Faulkner -10 (2-12), Parker -6 (8-14), Gemelos -2 (7-9), Goodlett -1 (28-29)

Phoenix 85, San Antonio 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 71, Phoenix 71
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .512, Phoenix .487
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 14, Phoenix 19
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 26, Phoenix 50
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 12, Phoenix 10
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Phoenix 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 109.9, Phoenix 119.7
Effective FG%: San Antonio .477, Phoenix .632
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .141, Phoenix .155
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .207, Phoenix .182
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .246, Phoenix .228
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride -13 (48-61), Hamby -4 (43-47), Young-Malcolm -9 (68-77), Greene -7 (41-48), Robinson -9 (61-70), Colson +7 (55-48), Adams -3 (41-44), Alexander +3 (33-30)
Phoenix: Bonner +8 (82-74), Dupree +10 (66-56), Griner +10 (75-65), Currie +7 (40-33), Mitchell +7 (69-62), Harden 0 (32-32), Quinn 0 (25-25), Bass -3 (12-15), Francis -3 (17-20), Christon -1 (7-8)

Seattle 74, Tulsa 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 76, Seattle 77
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .551, Seattle .448
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 6, Seattle 16
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 22, Seattle 28
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 4, Seattle 5
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 8, Seattle 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 90.8, Seattle 96.1
Effective FG%: Tulsa .423, Seattle .508
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .145, Seattle .130
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .200, Seattle .097
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .215, Seattle .177
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Christmas -6 (61-67), Pierson -2 (48-50), Paris 0 (41-41), Williams -1 (62-63), Kiesel -9 (54-63), Hooper +1 (30-29), Baugh -4 (21-25), Zahui B. -3 (21-24), Plaisance -1 (7-8)
Seattle: Clark -8 (42-50), Bishop -1 (29-30), Langhorne +2 (49-47), O’Hea +4 (48-44), Bird +8 (62-54), Tokashiki +6 (45-39), Loyd +11 (48-37), Hollingsworth +3 (25-22), Montgomery -1 (18-19), Goodrich +1 (4-3)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: