Inside the Box Score: July 2

Chicago 77, Connecticut 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 76, Connecticut 76
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .467, Connecticut .533
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 17, Connecticut 17
Points in the Paint: Chicago 28, Connecticut 42
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 6, Connecticut 11
Fast Break Points: Chicago 2, Connecticut 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 101.3, Connecticut 97.4
Effective FG%: Chicago .508, Connecticut .439
Turnover Pct: Chicago .211, Connecticut .197
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .267, Connecticut .333
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .226, Connecticut .122
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Quigley -3 (52-55), Delle Donne +4 (71-67), Breland +3 (69-66), Pondexter +3 (60-57), Vandersloot +14 (65-51), Faulkner -8 (6-14), dos Santos +3 (18-15), Laney +11 (38-27), Goodlett -6 (6-12), Gemelos -6 (0-6)
Connecticut: A.Thomas -10 (54-64), Little +6 (58-52), Pedersen -19 (37-56), Bentley +4 (62-58), J.Thomas -10 (44-54), Gray +7 (39-32), Williams +7 (53-46), Stricklen +4 (23-19), Orekhova -4 (0-4)

Indiana 73, Washington 50
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 65, Indiana 67
Rebound Percentage: Washington .532, Indiana .467
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 5, Indiana 21
Points in the Paint: Washington 14, Indiana 38
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 10, Indiana 10
Fast Break Points: Washington 2, Indiana 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 76.9, Indiana 109.0
Effective FG%: Washington .319, Indiana .509
Turnover Pct: Washington .277, Indiana .119
Offensive Reb%: Washington .351, Indiana .286
Free Throw Rate: Washington .224, Indiana .241
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -12 (40-52), Meesseman -13 (43-56), Dolson -17 (38-55), Lawson -12 (34-46), Latta -8 (40-48), Herrington -7 (7-14), Hill -15 (12-27), Malott -8 (7-15), Thornton -8 (12-20), Cloud -11 (8-19), Hartley -4 (9-13)
Indiana: Coleman +10 (37-27), Catchings +14 (54-40), Achonwa +7 (25-18), Johnson +20 (58-38), January +19 (62-43), Clarendon +23 (58-35), Kizer +10 (33-23), Howard +6 (23-17), Larkins +6 (15-9)

Phoenix 86, Tulsa 55
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 77, Phoenix 77
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .604, Phoenix .396
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 19, Phoenix 13
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 24, Phoenix 44
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 11, Phoenix 2
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 5, Phoenix 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 71.4, Phoenix 111.7
Effective FG%: Tulsa .310, Phoenix .611
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .169, Phoenix .169
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .333, Phoenix .125
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .155, Phoenix .143
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Christmas -24 (33-57), Pierson -23 (31-54), Paris -18 (25-43), Williams -25 (36-61), Kiesel -27 (44-71), Baugh -12 (20-32), Hooper -15 (37-52), Zahui B. -8 (24-32), Plaisance -3 (25-28)
Phoenix: Bonner +24 (50-26), Dupree +26 (50-24), Griner +26 (52-26), Currie +20 (49-29), Mitchell +10 (34-24), Harden +25 (43-18), Quinn +18 (38-20), Bass +5 (36-31), Francis 0 (25-25), Christon +2 (22-20), Bias 0 (17-17), Madgen -1 (14-15)

Los Angeles 86, San Antonio 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 75, Los Angeles 76
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .491, Los Angeles .509
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 13, Los Angeles 15
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 42, Los Angeles 50
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 6, Los Angeles 12
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Los Angeles 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 108.0, Los Angeles 113.2
Effective FG%: San Antonio .567, Los Angeles .524
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .187, Los Angeles .132
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .240, Los Angeles .258
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .217, Los Angeles .339
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride +5 (71-66), Hamby -3 (58-61), Young-Malcolm +1 (72-71), Perkins +4 (18-14), Robinson -2 (66-68), Greene -10 (55-65), Adams -8 (32-40), Colson -10 (24-34), Alexander -2 (9-11)
Los Angeles: Phillips +10 (77-67), Ogwumike -2 (65-67), Lavender +9 (75-66), Toliver 0 (74-74), Johnson +2 (68-66), Tolo +7 (41-34), Hoover 0 (19-19), Lister -1 (11-12)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: