Inside the Box Score: August 4

Connecticut 82, San Antonio 51
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 78, Connecticut 78
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .350, Connecticut .650
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 8, Connecticut 14
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 26, Connecticut 46
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 0, Connecticut 17
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Connecticut 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 65.4, Connecticut 105.1
Effective FG%: San Antonio .436, Connecticut .520
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .269, Connecticut .218
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .033, Connecticut .333
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .055, Connecticut .053
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride -11 (23-34), Young-Malcolm -8 (36-44), Appel -10 (35-45), Perkins -18 (36-54), Robinson -10 (38-48), Alexander -21 (16-37), Logic -18 (26-44), Hamby -23 (15-38), Colson -19 (11-30), Ayayi -17 (19-36)
Connecticut: A.Thomas +15 (43-28), Little +14 (38-24), Bone +15 (51-36), Bentley +24 (54-30), J.Thomas +13 (43-30), Pedersen +15 (30-15), Stricklen +17 (42-25), Gray +18 (39-21), Williams +16 (31-15), Faris +6 (25-19), Lacy +2 (14-12)

Chicago 106, Indiana 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 83, Chicago 82
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .490, Chicago .509
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 15, Chicago 20
Points in the Paint: Indiana 22, Chicago 48
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 9, Chicago 6
Fast Break Points: Indiana 10, Chicago 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 98.8, Chicago 129.3
Effective FG%: Indiana .413, Chicago .669
Turnover Pct: Indiana .169, Chicago .183
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .273, Chicago .292
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .267, Chicago .221
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman -10 (41-51), Catchings -17 (31-48), Achonwa -14 (36-50), Johnson -5 (45-50), January -17 (42-59), Larkins -12 (31-43), Zellous -23 (27-50), Kizer -12 (33-45), Pohlen -11 (46-57), Lucas -1 (45-46), Howard +2 (33-31)
Chicago: Delle Donne +22 (63-41), Breland +4 (32-28), de Souza +5 (43-38), Pondexter +12 (60-48), Vandersloot +9 (52-43), Quigley +26 (49-23), Parker +19 (63-44), Faulkner +15 (54-39), Young 0 (46-46), Laney +10 (42-32), Gemelos -2 (26-28)

Phoenix 87, Tulsa 84 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 81, Phoenix 80
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .539, Phoenix .461
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 15, Phoenix 9
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 38, Phoenix 40
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 23, Phoenix 15
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 5, Phoenix 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 103.7, Phoenix 108.8
Effective FG%: Tulsa .427, Phoenix .493
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .123, Phoenix .163
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .341, Phoenix .263
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .267, Phoenix .294
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Christmas -8 (63-71), Pierson -3 (70-73), Paris +4 (71-67), Williams -7 (71-78), Sims 0 (77-77), Baugh -5 (24-29), Hooper +5 (21-16), Kiesel +1 (20-19), Plaisance -2 (3-5)
Phoenix: Bonner +9 (82-73), Dupree +2 (67-65), Griner +8 (78-70), Currie -2 (27-29), Mitchell +4 (63-59), Quinn +7 (56-49), Bias -1 (24-25), Bass -4 (13-17), Harden -8 (9-17), Francis 0 (16-16)

Los Angeles 83, Minnesota 61
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 76, Los Angeles 75
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .440, Los Angeles .559
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 12, Los Angeles 21
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 22, Los Angeles 54
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 6, Los Angeles 14
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 4, Los Angeles 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 80.3, Los Angeles 110.7
Effective FG%: Minnesota .444, Los Angeles .494
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .197, Los Angeles .093
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .118, Los Angeles .237
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .097, Los Angeles .091
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore -13 (54-67), Brunson -10 (30-40), Fowles -16 (37-53), Cruz -13 (51-64), Whalen -11 (49-60), Jones -9 (29-38), Liston -16 (25-41), Montgomery -8 (19-27), Peters -11 (9-20), Kelley -3 (2-5)
Los Angeles: Ogwumike +12 (62-50), Parker +23 (70-47), Lavender +11 (70-59), Beard +17 (66-49), Toliver +14 (51-37), Dabovic +1 (29-28), Johnson +14 (38-24), Tolo +15 (22-7), Abdi +3 (5-2), Hamson 0 (2-2)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: