Inside the Box Score: August 9

Chicago 74, Phoenix 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 75, Chicago 76
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .443, Chicago .556
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 10, Chicago 10
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 36, Chicago 30
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 4, Chicago 14
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 11, Chicago 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 85.3, Chicago 97.4
Effective FG%: Phoenix .394, Chicago .391
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .147, Chicago .092
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .189, Chicago .302
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .182, Chicago .167
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner -10 (57-67), Dupree -13 (39-52), Griner -11 (57-68), Currie +6 (51-45), Mitchell -2 (26-28), Xargay -16 (17-33), Quinn -11 (15-26), Bass +6 (22-16), Francis -2 (10-12), Harden -3 (7-10), Bias +6 (19-13)
Chicago: Delle Donne +16 (67-51), Breland +2 (38-36), de Souza +3 (36-33), Pondexter +6 (49-43), Vandersloot +16 (66-50), Quigley +5 (50-45), dos Santos +7 (38-31), Young 0 (15-15), Faulkner -4 (5-9), Parker 0 (5-5), Laney -1 (1-2)

Washington 84, Connecticut 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 75, Washington 74
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .544, Washington .455
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 14, Washington 9
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 22, Washington 26
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 16, Washington 6
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 5, Washington 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 97.3, Washington 113.5
Effective FG%: Connecticut .383, Washington .549
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .107, Washington .162
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .263, Washington .174
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .375, Washington .549
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas -5 (59-64), Little -7 (33-40), Bone -2 (61-63), Bentley -14 (28-42), J.Thomas -5 (59-64), Gray -6 (14-20), Stricklen -3 (54-57), Williams -9 (12-21), Pedersen -4 (40-44), Faris 0 (5-5)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +3 (60-57), Meesseman +14 (68-54), Dolson +7 (63-56), Cloud +7 (51-44), Latta +17 (79-62), Hill 0 (45-45), Sanders -1 (20-21), Vaughn +4 (21-17), Hartley 0 (5-5), Malott +4 (8-4)

Atlanta 98, Tulsa 90
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 78, Tulsa 77
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .528, Tulsa .472
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 18, Tulsa 19
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 32, Tulsa 30
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 13, Tulsa 17
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 6, Tulsa 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 125.6, Tulsa 116.9
Effective FG%: Atlanta .552, Tulsa .469
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .154, Tulsa .143
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .346, Tulsa .290
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .358, Tulsa .469
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry 0 (74-74), Dantas +6 (81-75), Henry -3 (46-49), Hayes +6 (62-56), Schimmel -3 (37-40), Carter +7 (20-13), Hodges +10 (60-50), Milton-Jones +15 (59-44), Ajavon +4 (41-37), Gray -2 (10-12)
Tulsa: Christmas -6 (80-86), Pierson +1 (67-66), Paris +3 (73-70), Williams 0 (78-78), Kiesel -2 (41-43), Sims -6 (49-55), Baugh -12 (16-28), Hooper -10 (22-32), Plaisance -7 (2-9), Jackson-Jones -2 (12-14), Zahui B. +1 (10-9)

Minnesota 72, Los Angeles 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 73, Minnesota 75
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .481, Minnesota .518
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 4, Minnesota 17
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 24, Minnesota 46
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 8, Minnesota 12
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 13, Minnesota 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 87.7, Minnesota 96.0
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .427, Minnesota .402
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .219, Minnesota .120
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .257, Minnesota .294
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .177, Minnesota .288
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ogwumike -4 (57-61), Parker -6 (57-63), Lavender -8 (58-66), Beard -8 (8-16), Toliver -1 (64-65), Dabovic -5 (26-31), Tolo -4 (13-17), Johnson -3 (32-35), Abdi -1 (5-6)
Minnesota: Moore +9 (56-47), Brunson 0 (43-43), Fowles +11 (56-45), Cruz +12 (54-42), Whalen +5 (48-43), Jones +2 (38-36), Liston -3 (14-17), Montgomery -3 (23-26), Peters +7 (28-21), Kelley 0 (0-0)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 9) here or here.

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: