Inside the Box Score: August 30

Tulsa 76, Indiana 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 79, Tulsa 80
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .604, Tulsa .395
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 10, Tulsa 19
Points in the Paint: Indiana 30, Tulsa 26
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 6, Tulsa 0
Fast Break Points: Indiana 10, Tulsa 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 88.6, Tulsa 95.0
Effective FG%: Indiana .421, Tulsa .509
Turnover Pct: Indiana .203, Tulsa .175
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .286, Tulsa .077
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .157, Tulsa .293
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman +9 (51-42), Catchings +2 (55-53), Kizer 0 (51-51), Johnson 0 (58-58), Clarendon -11 (45-56), Zellous -11 (34-45), Howard -8 (6-14), Larkins -6 (14-20), Lucas -2 (10-12), Achonwa 0 (9-9), Pohlen -3 (17-20)
Tulsa: Christmas +5 (59-54), Pierson +9 (50-41), Paris -1 (36-37), Williams +5 (18-13), Sims +9 (72-63), Baugh +8 (32-24), Zahui B. +8 (14-6), Hooper -4 (30-34), Kiesel +3 (49-46), Jackson-Jones -7 (20-27), Plaisance -5 (0-5)

Los Angeles 60, San Antonio 52
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 75, Los Angeles 74
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .608, Los Angeles .392
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 12, Los Angeles 9
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 24, Los Angeles 22
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 6, Los Angeles 3
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 6, Los Angeles 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 69.3, Los Angeles 81.1
Effective FG%: San Antonio .307, Los Angeles .415
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .173, Los Angeles .203
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .302, Los Angeles .086
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .080, Los Angeles .186
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride -10 (27-37), Young-Malcolm -11 (36-47), Appel -12 (34-46), Perkins -8 (39-47), Robinson -11 (36-47), Montgomery +4 (27-23), Colson +1 (27-26), Hamby +3 (16-13), Adams +4 (18-14)
Los Angeles: Dabovic +12 (50-38), Parker +12 (55-43), Lavender +9 (57-48), Toliver +10 (53-43), Johnson +2 (33-31), Beard 0 (35-35), Bradford 0 (9-9), Abdi -5 (8-13)

Connecticut 72, Chicago 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .531, Chicago .468
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 3, Chicago 14
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 42, Chicago 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 8, Chicago 10
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 4, Chicago 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 92.3, Chicago 88.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .459, Chicago .382
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, Chicago .143
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .257, Chicago .194
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .262, Chicago .181
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Lacy -6 (31-37), Little 0 (32-32), Bone +3 (53-50), Faris +8 (62-54), J.Thomas +5 (57-52), Pedersen +13 (53-40), Greene -8 (6-14), Gray +13 (47-34), Stricklen -8 (19-27)
Chicago: Young +6 (56-50), Breland +3 (56-53), de Souza -11 (29-40), Quigley -6 (56-62), Vandersloot 0 (55-55), Laney -3 (24-27), dos Santos +5 (38-33), Parker -5 (13-18), Faulkner -4 (13-17), Gemelos -5 (0-5)

Minnesota 71, Phoenix 61
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 77, Minnesota 78
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .367, Minnesota .633
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 3, Minnesota 18
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 32, Minnesota 28
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 1, Minnesota 11
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Minnesota 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 79.2, Minnesota 91.0
Effective FG%: Phoenix .439, Minnesota .356
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .169, Minnesota .179
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .067, Minnesota .333
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .193, Minnesota .260
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner -10 (61-71), Dupree -9 (53-62), Griner -9 (56-65), Currie -11 (18-29), Xargay -10 (27-37), Mitchell 0 (34-34), Quinn +1 (43-42), Francis -2 (13-15)
Minnesota: Moore +10 (71-61), Brunson +5 (30-25), Fowles +9 (55-46), Cruz +15 (69-54), Whalen -4 (19-23), Montgomery +11 (50-39), Peters +4 (49-45), Jones 0 (12-12)

Seattle 69, Washington 59
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 74, Seattle 74
Rebound Percentage: Washington .528, Seattle .471
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 20, Seattle 21
Points in the Paint: Washington 34, Seattle 18
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 8, Seattle 7
Fast Break Points: Washington 4, Seattle 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 79.7, Seattle 93.2
Effective FG%: Washington .379, Seattle .442
Turnover Pct: Washington .216, Seattle .284
Offensive Reb%: Washington .265, Seattle .208
Free Throw Rate: Washington .136, Seattle .721
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -3 (31-34), Meesseman -1 (51-52), Dolson +2 (34-32), Cloud +2 (44-42), Latta -14 (51-65), Vaughn -12 (25-37), Hartley -7 (38-45), Herrington -4 (13-17), Sanders -9 (8-17), Malott -4 (0-4)
Seattle: Clark -5 (31-36), Langhorne +11 (64-53), Gatling -2 (23-25), Loyd +13 (58-45), Bird 0 (52-52), O’Hea +7 (43-36), Mosqueda-Lewis -2 (18-20), Hollingsworth +18 (39-21), Goodrich +10 (17-7)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 30) here or here.

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: