Inside the Box Score: June 19

Connecticut 93, San Antonio 90
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 80, Connecticut 80
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .394, Connecticut .605
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 14, Connecticut 22
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 30, Connecticut 44
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 8, Connecticut 19
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 11, Connecticut 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 112.5, Connecticut 116.3
Effective FG%: San Antonio .597, Connecticut .548
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .163, Connecticut .138
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .103, Connecticut .314
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .258, Connecticut .178
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Currie -6 (62-68), Hamby -3 (68-71), Appel-Marinelli -10 (29-39), McBride +3 (85-82), Jefferson -6 (74-80), Alexander 0 (50-50), Peters +9 (52-43), Ndour +1 (12-11), Colson -3 (18-21)
Connecticut: Tuck -3 (34-37), Little -7 (23-30), Bone -6 (39-45), Bentley +3 (93-90), J.Thomas +6 (77-71), Jones +8 (53-45), Faris +3 (59-56), Ogwumike +10 (70-60), Stricklen +1 (17-16)

New York 78, Indiana 75 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 86, Indiana 85
Rebound Percentage: New York .616, Indiana .383
Points Off Turnovers: New York 15, Indiana 17
Points in the Paint: New York 30, Indiana 28
2nd-Chance Points: New York 14, Indiana 2
Fast Break Points: New York 2, Indiana 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 90.7, Indiana 88.2
Effective FG%: New York .444, Indiana .371
Turnover Pct: New York .256, Indiana .176
Offensive Reb%: New York .417, Indiana .184
Free Throw Rate: New York .349, Indiana .394
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Cash +6 (62-56), Charles +8 (76-68), Swords -5 (18-23), Rodgers +10 (65-55), Wright +6 (63-57), Stokes +9 (60-51), Zellous -12 (27-39), Boyd 0 (15-15), Zahui B. -5 (2-7), Schimmel -2 (2-4)
Indiana: Coleman +5 (66-61), Catchings -5 (61-66), Larkins -1 (70-71), Mitchell -1 (60-61), January +1 (64-63), Peters -11 (6-17), Wheeler -6 (21-27), Moseley -4 (7-11), Kizer +2 (15-13), Achonwa +5 (5-0)

Minnesota 96, Seattle 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 81, Seattle 81
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .591, Seattle .408
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 24, Seattle 11
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 48, Seattle 32
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 9, Seattle 0
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Seattle 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 118.5, Seattle 103.7
Effective FG%: Minnesota .596, Seattle .516
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .136, Seattle .185
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .250, Seattle .067
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .123, Seattle .344
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore +3 (67-64), Brunson -8 (42-50), Fowles -6 (55-61), Augustus +9 (58-49), Whalen +11 (68-57), Montgomery +13 (57-44), Perkins +3 (38-35), Howard +18 (45-27), McCarville +23 (50-27), Hampton -3 (0-3), Graves -3 (0-3)
Seattle: Clark -7 (61-68), Stewart -5 (72-77), Langhorne +2 (58-56), Loyd -1 (84-85), Bird -7 (69-76), Gatling -5 (2-7), O’Hea -18 (23-41), Tokashiki -16 (36-52), Wright -5 (6-11), Mosqueda-Lewis +2 (9-7)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through June 19) here or here.

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: