Inside the Box Score: September 11

Chicago 96, Connecticut 86
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 82, Connecticut 82
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .478, Connecticut .522
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 15, Connecticut 15
Points in the Paint: Chicago 36, Connecticut 48
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 9, Connecticut 17
Fast Break Points: Chicago 7, Connecticut 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 117.1, Connecticut 104.9
Effective FG%: Chicago .545, Connecticut .437
Turnover Pct: Chicago .159, Connecticut .146
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .313, Connecticut .356
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .364, Connecticut .215
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Breland +18 (84-66), Parker -5 (29-34), Boyette +16 (68-52), Pondexter +15 (87-72), Vandersloot +6 (84-78), Quigley +11 (68-57), de Souza -3 (28-31), Faulkner -4 (21-25), dos Santos -4 (11-15)
Connecticut: A.Thomas -8 (51-59), Ogwumike -2 (74-76), Little -14 (61-75), Bentley -9 (50-59), J.Thomas -13 (70-83), Jones -1 (37-38), Williams 0 (56-56), Faris -3 (31-34)

Indiana 80, Washington 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 71, Washington 72
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .513, Washington .486
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 10, Washington 12
Points in the Paint: Indiana 40, Washington 28
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 15, Washington 10
Fast Break Points: Indiana 6, Washington 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 112.7, Washington 101.4
Effective FG%: Indiana .540, Washington .492
Turnover Pct: Indiana .197, Washington .153
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .296, Washington .269
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .210, Washington .194
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman +12 (56-44), Catchings -2 (33-35), Larkins +5 (15-10), Wheeler +1 (62-61), January +6 (72-66), Achonwa -8 (9-17), Johnson +7 (53-46), Kizer +7 (54-47), Mitchell +7 (26-19), Peters 0 (20-20)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -7 (58-65), Meesseman +6 (65-59), Dolson -8 (46-54), Hill -12 (58-70), Cloud -1 (69-70), Vaughn -7 (27-34), Mitchell 0 (30-30), Copper -4 (10-14), Malott -2 (2-4)

Dallas 84, New York 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 81, Dallas 81
Rebound Percentage: New York .478, Dallas .522
Points Off Turnovers: New York 14, Dallas 16
Points in the Paint: New York 36, Dallas 46
2nd-Chance Points: New York 12, Dallas 13
Fast Break Points: New York 13, Dallas 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 100.0, Dallas 103.7
Effective FG%: New York .492, Dallas .449
Turnover Pct: New York .198, Dallas .148
Offensive Reb%: New York .206, Dallas .250
Free Throw Rate: New York .262, Dallas .319
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Allen -14 (23-37), Charles -6 (72-78), Swords +1 (40-39), Rodgers +5 (70-65), Boyd +6 (77-71), Prince -11 (15-26), Zellous +11 (58-47), Zahui B. -5 (21-26), Cash -2 (29-31)
Dallas: Powers -3 (67-70), Christmas +7 (82-75), Paris -2 (68-70), Phillips +3 (41-38), Diggins +11 (82-71), Sims -6 (45-51), Plaisance +8 (31-23), Hamblin 0 (0-0), Hooper -3 (4-7)

Minnesota 81, San Antonio 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 79, San Antonio 80
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .516, San Antonio .484
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 8, San Antonio 7
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 22, San Antonio 38
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 14, San Antonio 12
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 7, San Antonio 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 102.5, San Antonio 95.0
Effective FG%: Minnesota .408, San Antonio .438
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .101, San Antonio .125
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .237, San Antonio .205
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .431, San Antonio .181
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore +6 (71-65), Brunson +5 (57-52), Fowles -4 (36-40), Augustus +5 (60-55), Whalen +7 (60-53), Cruz -1 (19-20), Howard +2 (20-18), Montgomery -2 (21-23), Perkins +5 (25-20), McCarville +4 (28-24), Hampton -2 (8-10)
San Antonio: Currie 0 (55-55), Ndour -2 (64-66), Appel-Marinelli -2 (52-54), Gwathmey -17 (41-58), Jefferson +2 (72-70), Peters 0 (29-29), Colson +2 (44-42), Baugh -8 (23-31)

Phoenix 86, Atlanta 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 80, Phoenix 80
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .541, Phoenix .458
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 14, Phoenix 16
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 22, Phoenix 38
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 10, Phoenix 8
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 8, Phoenix 23
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 93.8, Phoenix 107.5
Effective FG%: Atlanta .452, Phoenix .451
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .263, Phoenix .138
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .361, Phoenix .278
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .286, Phoenix .310
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Holmes -18 (51-69), McCoughtry -7 (22-29), Williams -15 (71-86), Hayes +3 (59-56), Clarendon -14 (61-75), Ajavon -6 (31-37), Hollivay +7 (50-43), Gray -10 (7-17), Simmons -1 (4-5), Gatling 0 (9-9), Cortijo +6 (10-4)
Phoenix: Taylor +6 (57-51), Dupree +19 (81-62), Griner +16 (73-57), Taurasi +12 (65-53), Xargay +27 (58-31), Bonner +9 (54-45), Harding -13 (12-25), Bone -5 (13-18), Petrovic -9 (13-22), Bass -3 (4-7), Harden -2 (0-2), Harrison -2 (0-2)

Seattle 78, Los Angeles 60
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 78, Seattle 79
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .396, Seattle .604
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 20, Seattle 13
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Seattle 32
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 4, Seattle 6
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 3, Seattle 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 76.9, Seattle 98.7
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .402, Seattle .492
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .167, Seattle .228
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .059, Seattle .267
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .180, Seattle .295
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Carson -16 (38-54), Parker -9 (48-57), Wauters -9 (8-17), Beard -23 (41-64), Gray -16 (55-71), Dabovic +5 (40-35), Lavender -10 (42-52), Belyakova -4 (6-10), Dubljevic -8 (6-14), Gruda 0 (16-16)
Seattle: Clark +18 (57-39), Stewart +24 (67-43), Langhorne +17 (62-45), Loyd +18 (67-49), Bird +27 (72-45), Quinn -2 (17-19), Tokashiki +5 (27-22), Mosqueda-Lewis +1 (21-20), Bishop -5 (0-5), O’Hea -5 (0-5), Thomas -5 (0-5), Wright -3 (0-3)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Sept. 11) here or here.

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: