Dallas 96, Connecticut 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 83, Dallas 83
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .487, Dallas .512
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 19, Dallas 25
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 38, Dallas 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 9, Dallas 17
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 19, Dallas 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 98.8, Dallas 115.7
Effective FG%: Connecticut .546, Dallas .570
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .229, Dallas .169
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .233, Dallas .258
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .169, Dallas .359
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen -16 (62-78), A.Thomas -8 (66-74), J.Jones -3 (60-63), Williams -3 (56-59), J.Thomas -12 (55-67), Pedersen -14 (41-55), Bentley -13 (33-46), Banham +1 (25-24), Adams -2 (12-14)
Dallas: Christmas-Kelly +19 (78-59), Johnson +14 (70-56), Plaisance +11 (71-60), Gray +8 (70-62), Diggins-Smith +8 (75-67), Davis -3 (24-27), Thornton +6 (45-39), Akhator -3 (6-9), Chong +10 (41-31)
Washington 97, Chicago 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 82, Chicago 83
Rebound Percentage: Washington .582, Chicago .417
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 32, Chicago 7
Points in the Paint: Washington 42, Chicago 34
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 15, Chicago 8
Fast Break Points: Washington 16, Chicago 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 118.3, Chicago 75.9
Effective FG%: Washington .512, Chicago .412
Turnover Pct: Washington .122, Chicago .277
Offensive Reb%: Washington .371, Chicago .206
Free Throw Rate: Washington .145, Chicago .103
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +7 (37-30), Delle Donne +25 (70-45), Thomas +17 (50-33), Hill +27 (64-37), Toliver +11 (67-56), Latta +17 (45-28), Cloud +22 (56-34), Hawkins +18 (49-31), Taylor +8 (25-17), Walker-Kimbrough +9 (11-2), Simms +9 (11-2)
Chicago: Young -32 (38-70), Breland -5 (44-49), Dolson -1 (46-47), Quigley -16 (49-65), Pondexter -24 (34-58), Vandersloot -14 (39-53), Boyette -27 (17-44), Copper -20 (13-33), Parker 16 (11-27), Hampton +1 (20-19), Harris -9 (2-11), Epps -7 (2-9)
Minnesota 87, San Antonio 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 76, Minnesota 76
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .445, Minnesota .554
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 15, Minnesota 17
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 40, Minnesota 24
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 10, Minnesota 13
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 14, Minnesota 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 102.6, Minnesota 114.5
Effective FG%: San Antonio .424, Minnesota .508
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .132, Minnesota .197
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .324, Minnesota .433
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .236, Minnesota .387
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Currie 0 (15-15), Harrison -5 (71-76), de Souza -9 (8-17), McBride -8 (73-81), Jefferson -5 (72-77), Alexander +4 (70-66), Montgomery -1 (44-45), Hamby -8 (7-15), Holmes -9 (24-33), Plum -4 (6-10)
Minnesota: Moore +3 (68-65), Brunson -2 (66-68), Fowles +22 (67-45), Augustus +5 (62-57), Whalen +6 (51-45), Howard +2 (39-37), Montgomery +3 (36-33), Perkins +4 (25-21), Pierson +2 (21-19)
– – –
You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through June 25) here or here.
