Inside the Box Score: July 12

San Antonio 79, Indiana 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 75, Indiana 75
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .553, Indiana .447
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 11, Indiana 11
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 40, Indiana 44
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 14, Indiana 6
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 2, Indiana 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 105.3, Indiana 96.0
Effective FG%: San Antonio .516, Indiana .471
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .200, Indiana .147
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .267, Indiana .161
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .262, Indiana .118
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Montgomery +16 (38-22), Harrison -3 (36-39), de Souza +5 (44-39), McBride +7 (77-70), Plum +12 (72-60), Hamby +9 (49-40), Coffey -1 (12-13), Colson +1 (26-25), Murphy -4 (23-27), Alexander -1 (5-6), Holmes -6 (13-19)
Indiana: Coleman -4 (45-49), Dupree -6 (69-75), Larkins -12 (24-36), Wheeler -7 (51-58), January -3 (58-61), Mitchell -6 (22-28), Achonwa +9 (38-29), Gwathmey 0 (26-26), McCall -1 (3-4), Hamson -4 (10-14), Pohlen-Mavunga -1 (14-15)

Chicago 90, Dallas 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 82, Chicago 82
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .440, Chicago .560
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 32, Chicago 16
Points in the Paint: Dallas 34, Chicago 32
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 7, Chicago 14
Fast Break Points: Dallas 15, Chicago 23
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 102.4, Chicago 109.8
Effective FG%: Dallas .446, Chicago .621
Turnover Pct: Dallas .146, Chicago .268
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .250, Chicago .370
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .243, Chicago .121
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Christmas-Kelly 0 (77-77), Johnson -13 (33-46), Plaisance -2 (38-40), Gray -8 (52-60), Diggins-Smith +10 (77-67), Davis +2 (43-41), Paris -6 (21-27), Chong -7 (27-34), Thornton -6 (52-58)
Chicago: Young +7 (52-45), Breland -11 (55-66), Dolson +9 (59-50), Quigley +3 (70-67), Vandersloot +9 (79-70), Copper -2 (21-23), Parker -4 (23-27), Boyette +16 (25-9), Epps +1 (11-10), Hampton -2 (37-39), Harris +4 (18-14)

Connecticut 83, Seattle 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 80, Seattle 80
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .581, Seattle .419
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 23, Seattle 14
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 24, Seattle 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 16, Seattle 6
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 6, Seattle 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 103.8, Seattle 98.8
Effective FG%: Connecticut .500, Seattle .556
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .163, Seattle .188
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .273, Seattle .111
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .169, Seattle .143
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen +10 (70-60), A.Thomas +12 (70-58), J.Jones 0 (71-71), Williams +13 (56-43), J.Thomas +2 (69-67), Bentley -7 (41-48), Kizer +2 (7-5), Pedersen -6 (18-24), Tuck -6 (13-19)
Seattle: Clark -2 (52-54), Stewart +3 (69-66), Langhorne -10 (46-56), Loyd -3 (69-72), Bird +3 (63-60), Whitcomb -4 (22-26), Tokashiki -4 (15-19), Quinn -7 (16-23), Swords +3 (28-25), Mosqueda-Lewis +1 (15-14)

Phoenix 89, Atlanta 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 82, Phoenix 80
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .424, Phoenix .575
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 15, Phoenix 15
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 26, Phoenix 36
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 7, Phoenix 14
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 13, Phoenix 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 102.4, Phoenix 111.3
Effective FG%: Atlanta .528, Phoenix .500
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .134, Phoenix .175
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .143, Phoenix .294
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .111, Phoenix .348
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Sykes -4 (77-81), Lyttle -3 (58-61), Williams -3 (72-75), Hayes -7 (68-75), Clarendon +2 (78-76), Ajavon -7 (6-13), Dantas +4 (25-21), Holmes -10 (20-30), Hooper +3 (16-13)
Phoenix: Talbot -1 (39-40), Little +4 (71-67), Griner +13 (85-72), Taurasi +4 (71-67), D.Robinson -11 (29-40), Mitchell +16 (60-44), Cannon -5 (10-15), Currie -4 (23-27), Turner +11 (45-34), A.Robinson -8 (4-12), George +6 (8-2)

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: