Inside the Box Score: July 30

Connecticut 89, Indiana 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 82, Connecticut 83
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .452, Connecticut .548
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 12, Connecticut 23
Points in the Paint: Indiana 22, Connecticut 36
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 6, Connecticut 15
Fast Break Points: Indiana 11, Connecticut 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 89.0, Connecticut 107.2
Effective FG%: Indiana .444, Connecticut .500
Turnover Pct: Indiana .220, Connecticut .145
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .216, Connecticut .313
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .125, Connecticut .236
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Mitchell -25 (37-62), McCall -17 (46-63), Achonwa -23 (17-40), Wheeler -20 (40-60), January -15 (37-52), Gwathmey +16 (48-32), Coleman -7 (50-57), Larkins -11 (14-25), Pohlen-Mavunga +4 (34-30), Hamson +18 (42-24)
Connecticut: Stricklen +25 (64-39), A.Thomas +31 (65-34), J.Jones +32 (66-34), Williams +12 (40-28), J.Thomas +35 (66-31), Bentley +2 (59-57), Tuck -14 (27-41), Kizer +3 (10-7), Banham -16 (19-35), B.Jones -5 (13-18), Pedersen -15 (12-27), Adams -10 (4-14)

Washington 77, Atlanta 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 79, Atlanta 78
Rebound Percentage: Washington .569, Atlanta .431
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 8, Atlanta 21
Points in the Paint: Washington 30, Atlanta 42
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 19, Atlanta 10
Fast Break Points: Washington 11, Atlanta 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 97.5, Atlanta 89.7
Effective FG%: Washington .440, Atlanta .396
Turnover Pct: Washington .190, Atlanta .090
Offensive Reb%: Washington .343, Atlanta .205
Free Throw Rate: Washington .269, Atlanta .117
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Delle Donne +7 (67-60), Meesseman +5 (67-62), Thomas 0 (48-48), Ruffin-Pratt +9 (57-48), Toliver +8 (65-57), Walker-Kimbrough -4 (8-12), Hawkins +7 (33-26), Latta +7 (28-21), Hightower -4 (12-16)
Atlanta: Sykes -3 (57-60), Lyttle 0 (59-59), Williams +2 (62-60), Hayes -16 (27-43), Clarendon +1 (56-55), Holmes +2 (52-50), Ajavon -4 (14-18), Dantas -6 (14-20), Hooper -9 (4-13), Morello -2 (5-7)

Los Angeles 95, Dallas 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 84, Los Angeles 84
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .405, Los Angeles .594
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 21, Los Angeles 24
Points in the Paint: Dallas 20, Los Angeles 66
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 6, Los Angeles 7
Fast Break Points: Dallas 18, Los Angeles 26
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 88.1, Los Angeles 113.1
Effective FG%: Dallas .333, Los Angeles .585
Turnover Pct: Dallas .143, Los Angeles .190
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .175, Los Angeles .364
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .455, Los Angeles .169
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Powers -12 (63-75), Christmas-Kelly -13 (53-66), Johnson -8 (57-65), Gray -21 (47-68), Diggins-Smith -20 (60-80), Davis -8 (9-17), Paris -4 (4-8), Plaisance -8 (21-29), Thornton -5 (26-31), Chong -8 (18-26), Akhator +1 (6-5), Lewis +1 (6-5)
Los Angeles: Beard +28 (67-39), Ogwumike +12 (63-51), Parker +11 (65-54), Sims +12 (70-58), Gray +27 (84-57), Williams +9 (45-36), Lavender +3 (41-38), Wiese -4 (11-15), Jackson-Jones +8 (24-16), Diarra -1 (5-6)

Phoenix 81, San Antonio 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 82, Phoenix 82
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .585, Phoenix .414
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 11, Phoenix 16
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 34, Phoenix 26
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 15, Phoenix 4
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 5, Phoenix 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 78.0, Phoenix 98.8
Effective FG%: San Antonio .369, Phoenix .469
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .256, Phoenix .159
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .333, Phoenix .162
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .246, Phoenix .328
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Montgomery -23 (19-42), Hamby +4 (44-40), Harrison -20 (45-65), McBride -3 (50-53), Plum -15 (45-60), de Souza -16 (5-21), Holmes -7 (17-24), Alexander -5 (7-12), Colson -3 (23-26), Murphy 0 (38-38), Coffey +3 (27-24)
Phoenix: Talbot +1 (21-20), Little +22 (54-32), A.Robinson +7 (35-28), Taurasi +18 (48-30), D.Robinson +14 (51-37), Currie +14 (55-41), George +11 (50-39), Cannon -6 (23-29), Mitchell +3 (32-29), Turner +6 (28-22), Prince -5 (8-13)

New York 86, Chicago 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 80, Chicago 80
Rebound Percentage: New York .578, Chicago .422
Points Off Turnovers: New York 16, Chicago 13
Points in the Paint: New York 40, Chicago 34
2nd-Chance Points: New York 15, Chicago 2
Fast Break Points: New York 10, Chicago 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 107.5, Chicago 102.5
Effective FG%: New York .506, Chicago .544
Turnover Pct: New York .213, Chicago .188
Offensive Reb%: New York .382, Chicago .226
Free Throw Rate: New York .104, Chicago .118
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Zellous -10 (52-62), Charles -13 (63-76), Vaughn -5 (22-27), Prince -8 (42-50), Hartley -13 (50-63), Stokes +9 (64-55), Rodgers +12 (44-32), L.Allen +17 (36-19), R.Allen +16 (36-20), Raincock-Ekunwe +15 (21-6)
Chicago: Young -8 (46-54), Breland +2 (73-71), Dolson 0 (79-79), Quigley 0 (67-67), Vandersloot +1 (70-69), Harris -8 (12-20), Pondexter -7 (37-44), Copper 0 (26-26)

Minnesota 93, Seattle 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 79, Minnesota 79
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .455, Minnesota .545
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 4, Minnesota 11
Points in the Paint: Seattle 28, Minnesota 46
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 12, Minnesota 8
Fast Break Points: Seattle 3, Minnesota 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 103.8, Minnesota 117.7
Effective FG%: Seattle .530, Minnesota .565
Turnover Pct: Seattle .139, Minnesota .139
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .200, Minnesota .290
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .182, Minnesota .217
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -2 (58-60), Stewart -7 (82-89), Langhorne -10 (61-71), Loyd -16 (63-79), Bird -19 (52-71), Whitcomb +6 (34-28), Swords -5 (21-26), Quinn -2 (39-41)
Minnesota: Moore +8 (76-68), Brunson +16 (82-66), Fowles +14 (87-73), Perkins +15 (85-70), Whalen +9 (53-44), Montgomery +5 (55-50), Howard 0 (7-7), Jones -4 (3-7), Pierson -8 (17-25)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 30) here or here.

Advertisements
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: