Inside the Box Score: July 22

Atlanta 87, Seattle 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 79, Atlanta 79
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .455, Atlanta .545
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 11, Atlanta 23
Points in the Paint: Seattle 32, Atlanta 52
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 11, Atlanta 14
Fast Break Points: Seattle 5, Atlanta 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 93.7, Atlanta 110.1
Effective FG%: Seattle .472, Atlanta .507
Turnover Pct: Seattle .177, Atlanta .127
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .243, Atlanta .333
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .099, Atlanta .211
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -14 (53-67), Howard -5 (43-48), Stewart -16 (61-77), Loyd -10 (59-69), Bird -14 (53-67), Langhorne -12 (27-39), Canada -3 (21-24), Mosqueda-Lewis -5 (6-11), Paris +3 (13-10), Whitcomb +1 (15-14), Quinn +6 (15-9), Russell +4 (4-0)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +5 (62-57), Breland +14 (73-59), Williams +14 (73-59), Hayes +18 (76-58), Montgomery +4 (50-46), Sykes +5 (28-23), Bentley +7 (45-38), Billings -1 (16-17), McGee-Stafford -1 (12-13), Dietrick 0 (0-0)

Connecticut 92, Dallas 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 77, Dallas 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .577, Dallas .423
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 16, Dallas 4
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 40, Dallas 42
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 20, Dallas 10
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 15, Dallas 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 119.5, Dallas 96.2
Effective FG%: Connecticut .568, Dallas .492
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .104, Dallas .154
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .333, Dallas .179
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .108, Dallas .152
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen +16 (83-67), A.Thomas +13 (66-53), Ogwumike +1 (32-31), Williams +16 (81-65), J.Thomas +21 (81-60), J.Jones +16 (60-44), Tuck +4 (26-22), Banham +1 (11-10), Clarendon -4 (11-15), Laney +1 (9-8)
Dallas: Thornton -12 (70-82), Johnson -14 (47-61), Cambage -15 (73-88), Gray -15 (51-66), Diggins-Smith -10 (64-74), Davis -11 (22-33), Stevens -6 (23-29), George -2 (25-27)

Las Vegas 88, Indiana 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 80, Las Vegas 81
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .400, Las Vegas .600
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 9, Las Vegas 9
Points in the Paint: Indiana 20, Las Vegas 24
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 4, Las Vegas 19
Fast Break Points: Indiana 2, Las Vegas 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 92.5, Las Vegas 108.6
Effective FG%: Indiana .449, Las Vegas .479
Turnover Pct: Indiana .150, Las Vegas .136
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .171, Las Vegas .371
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .191, Las Vegas .247
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Vivians -16 (55-71), Dupree -5 (57-62), Achonwa -10 (57-67), Pondexter -10 (52-62), Wheeler -4 (44-48), K.Mitchell -10 (30-40), T.Mitchell -5 (31-36), McCall -9 (17-26), Alexander -6 (7-13), Taylor +3 (10-7), Mavunga +2 (10-8)
Las Vegas: Young +3 (51-48), Wilson +10 (69-59), Bone -8 (12-20), McBride +14 (73-59), Plum +8 (59-51), Swords +19 (55-36), Nared +11 (37-26), Jefferson +10 (23-13), Hamby +4 (19-15), Coffey 0 (15-15), Park +3 (21-18), Allen -4 (6-10)

Los Angeles 93, Chicago 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 77, Chicago 79
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .525, Chicago .475
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 20, Chicago 13
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 48, Chicago 38
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 8, Chicago 11
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 9, Chicago 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 120.8, Chicago 96.2
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .582, Chicago .500
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .130, Chicago .165
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .273, Chicago .222
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .110, Chicago .101
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Carson +8 (74-66), Parker +16 (79-63), Lavender +20 (76-56), Sims +19 (78-59), Gray +17 (78-61), Vadeeva -4 (26-30), Williams +1 (38-37), Wiese +6 (11-5), Samuelson +2 (5-3)
Chicago: DeShields -5 (61-66), Williams -20 (35-55), Dolson -15 (66-81), Quigley -15 (56-71), Vandersloot -6 (69-75), Parker 0 (41-41), Copper -14 (35-49), Ndour +2 (7-5), Harper -11 (7-18), Coates -1 (3-4)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 22) here or here.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: