Monthly Archives: August 2019

Inside the Box Score: August 30

Connecticut 94, New York 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 81, New York 80
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .479, New York .521
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 10, New York 13
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 34, New York 40
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 13, New York 25
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 6, New York 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 116.0, New York 105.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .560, New York .500
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .123, New York .163
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .233, New York .275
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .284, New York .105
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen +4 (71-67), A.Thomas +11 (88-77), J.Jones -6 (39-45), Williams +9 (86-77), J.Thomas +7 (76-69), Holmes +7 (31-24), Hiedeman +3 (18-15), Plaisance +3 (18-15), Tuck -1 (6-7), B.Jones +13 (37-24)
New York: Nurse -11 (55-66), Raincock-Ekunwe +4 (43-39), Zahui B. -8 (67-75), Wright +3 (52-49), Hartley -5 (26-31), Gray -6 (13-19), Allen -3 (33-36), Boyd -11 (30-41), Johannès -7 (60-67), Han -6 (41-47)

Inside the Box Score: August 29

Los Angeles 87, Indiana 83
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 79, Indiana 78
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .422, Indiana .578
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 13, Indiana 17
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 36, Indiana 36
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 11, Indiana 17
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 5, Indiana 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 110.1, Indiana 106.4
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .556, Indiana .422
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .139, Indiana .179
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .156, Indiana .313
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .097, Indiana .453
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt -6 (47-53), Parker +7 (73-66), N.Ogwumike +4 (52-48), Williams +4 (80-76), Gray +8 (85-77), C.Ogwumike -5 (7-12), Brown +2 (42-40), Wiese +13 (40-27), Jones -2 (2-4), Vadeeva -5 (7-12)
Indiana: Burke -1 (48-49), Dupree -4 (83-87), McCowan +7 (58-51), T.Mitchell -5 (71-76), Wheeler -3 (24-27), Laney -6 (45-51), K.Mitchell +3 (61-58), Mavunga -11 (25-36)

Dallas 88, Chicago 83
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 79, Chicago 78
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .541, Chicago .459
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 16, Chicago 11
Points in the Paint: Dallas 34, Chicago 42
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 17, Chicago 10
Fast Break Points: Dallas 10, Chicago 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 111.4, Chicago 106.4
Effective FG%: Dallas .453, Chicago .461
Turnover Pct: Dallas .089, Chicago .167
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .371, Chicago .290
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .267, Chicago .375
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Gray +3 (80-77), Johnson +3 (66-63), Harrison +4 (75-71), Davis -4 (73-77), Ogunbowale +2 (78-76), Anigwe +8 (40-32), McCarty-Williams +5 (18-13), Gustafson +4 (10-6)
Chicago: DeShields +3 (70-67), Ndour +3 (57-54), Dolson +3 (63-60), Quigley +3 (69-66), Vandersloot +7 (69-62), Copper -13 (15-28), Williams -8 (20-28), Parker -13 (38-51), Faulkner -2 (4-6), Samuelson -8 (10-18)

Phoenix 65, Atlanta 58
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 81, Atlanta 81
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .399, Atlanta .601
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 19, Atlanta 10
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 20, Atlanta 24
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 3, Atlanta 10
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 7, Atlanta 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 80.2, Atlanta 71.6
Effective FG%: Phoenix .420, Atlanta .292
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .247, Atlanta .198
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .125, Atlanta .327
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .321, Atlanta .169
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +2 (45-43), B.Turner +4 (31-27), Griner +2 (56-54), Taurasi +6 (38-32), Mitchell +6 (48-42), January -3 (20-23), Carson +6 (17-11), Little +9 (33-24), Y.Turner +5 (24-19), Cunningham 0 (11-11), Lyttle -2 (2-4)
Atlanta: Hayes -7 (32-39), Breland -3 (31-34), Williams -3 (31-34), Sykes -6 (32-38), Montgomery -7 (47-54), Coffey -2 (28-30), Bentley -2 (13-15), Gülich -4 (27-31), Billings -4 (27-31), Cazorla +3 (22-19)

Inside the Box Score: August 27

Indiana 86, Las Vegas 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Las Vegas 79, Indiana 80
Rebound Percentage: Las Vegas .479, Indiana .521
Points Off Turnovers: Las Vegas 7, Indiana 11
Points in the Paint: Las Vegas 26, Indiana 28
2nd-Chance Points: Las Vegas 10, Indiana 15
Fast Break Points: Las Vegas 5, Indiana 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Las Vegas 89.9, Indiana 107.5
Effective FG%: Las Vegas .373, Indiana .442
Turnover Pct: Las Vegas .101, Indiana .100
Offensive Reb%: Las Vegas .227, Indiana .270
Free Throw Rate: Las Vegas .254, Indiana .234
Individual Plus/Minus:
Las Vegas: T.Young -12 (30-42), Wilson -17 (51-68), Cambage -22 (36-58), McBride -14 (14-28), J.Young -5 (48-53), Hamby -10 (54-64), Plum -10 (58-68), Rodgers -1 (16-17), Colson -2 (7-9), Swords +9 (32-23), Park +9 (9-0)
Indiana: Burke +11 (54-43), Dupree +18 (64-46), McCowan +22 (73-51), T.Mitchell +21 (61-40), Wheeler +8 (36-28), K.Mitchell +14 (58-44), Achonwa +6 (27-21), Laney 0 (49-49), Mavunga -7 (8-15), McCall -9 (0-9), Kea -9 (0-9)

Phoenix 95, New York 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 79, New York 77
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .554, New York .446
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 10, New York 15
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 42, New York 30
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 11, New York 11
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 5, New York 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 120.3, New York 106.5
Effective FG%: Phoenix .651, New York .521
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .165, New York .143
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .308, New York .200
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .206, New York .113
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +8 (68-60), B.Turner +7 (57-50), Griner +13 (88-75), Taurasi +2 (60-58), Mitchell +13 (82-69), January +11 (34-23), Carson +8 (22-14), Y.Turner 0 (14-14), Lyttle -7 (7-14), Cunningham -2 (14-16), Little +12 (29-17)
New York: Nurse -10 (67-77), Charles -14 (71-85), Zahui B. -3 (62-65), Wright -1 (47-48), Hartley -5 (73-78), Allen -4 (21-25), Boyd -12 (35-47), Gray -3 (11-14), Raincock-Ekunwe -5 (14-19), Johannès -8 (9-17)

Washington 95, Los Angeles 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 77, Washington 77
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .543, Washington .457
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 4, Washington 19
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Washington 24
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 8, Washington 13
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 2, Washington 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 85.7, Washington 123.4
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .366, Washington .562
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .195, Washington .117
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .308, Washington .222
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .254, Washington .338
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt -19 (33-52), Parker -22 (29-51), N.Ogwumike -32 (40-72), Williams -38 (40-78), Gray -36 (45-81), C.Ogwumike -16 (27-43), Beard -2 (9-11), Vadeeva +3 (26-23), Wiese -7 (28-35), Jones +5 (19-14), Brown +8 (17-9), Mabrey +11 (17-6)
Washington: Atkins +35 (70-35), Delle Donne +28 (68-40), Sanders +25 (48-23), Walker-Kimbrough +1 (39-38), Cloud +33 (76-43), Powers +27 (61-34), Meesseman +17 (43-26), Hawkins 0 (29-29), Hines-Allen -6 (18-24), Peddy -5 (14-19), Mestdagh -10 (9-19)

Minnesota 93, Chicago 85
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 86, Minnesota 87
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .469, Minnesota .531
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 18, Minnesota 19
Points in the Paint: Chicago 42, Minnesota 44
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 18, Minnesota 14
Fast Break Points: Chicago 6, Minnesota 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 98.8, Minnesota 106.9
Effective FG%: Chicago .480, Minnesota .527
Turnover Pct: Chicago .198, Minnesota .149
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .216, Minnesota .278
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .189, Minnesota .187
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: DeShields -3 (74-77), Ndour -5 (56-61), Dolson -16 (41-57), Quigley -15 (65-80), Vandersloot -12 (61-73), Parker +8 (65-57), Alexander -4 (4-8), Copper 0 (4-4), Williams +5 (33-28), Samuelson +2 (22-20)
Minnesota: Collier +8 (91-83), Dantas +5 (80-75), Fowles +19 (71-52), Sims +15 (89-74), Robinson +12 (91-79), Fagbenle -11 (22-33), Brown -4 (2-6), Talbot -4 (15-19), Augustus 0 (4-4)

Connecticut 89, Seattle 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 80, Seattle 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .578, Seattle .422
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 20, Seattle 8
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 58, Seattle 18
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 18, Seattle 10
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 19, Seattle 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 111.3, Seattle 89.7
Effective FG%: Connecticut .550, Seattle .492
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .125, Seattle .231
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .314, Seattle .158
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .171, Seattle .145
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen +13 (47-34), A.Thomas +19 (80-61), J.Jones +11 (49-38), Williams +18 (80-62), J.Thomas +21 (69-48), Holmes +2 (33-31), Tuck +5 (27-22), Plaisance +2 (9-7), Hiedeman -2 (20-22), B.Jones +6 (31-25)
Seattle: Clark -7 (51-58), Howard -19 (52-71), Russell -27 (37-64), Loyd -16 (48-64), Canada -24 (46-70), Langhorne 0 (37-37), Whitcomb -5 (20-25), Paris +5 (17-12), Zellous +1 (9-8), Mosqueda-Lewis -7 (18-25), Dietrick +4 (15-11)

Inside the Box Score: August 25

Washington 101, New York 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 82, Washington 82
Rebound Percentage: New York .445, Washington .555
Points Off Turnovers: New York 9, Washington 8
Points in the Paint: New York 20, Washington 34
2nd-Chance Points: New York 15, Washington 10
Fast Break Points: New York 3, Washington 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 87.8, Washington 123.2
Effective FG%: New York .431, Washington .608
Turnover Pct: New York .146, Washington .171
Offensive Reb%: New York .179, Washington .290
Free Throw Rate: New York .139, Washington .149
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Nurse -29 (57-86), Charles -15 (37-52), Zahui B. -13 (27-40), Wright -9 (29-38), Hartley -11 (46-57), Gray -19 (21-40), Boyd -15 (23-38), Johannès -23 (46-69), Raincock-Ekunwe -4 (24-28), Allen -13 (30-43), Han +6 (20-14)
Washington: Atkins +21 (60-39), Delle Donne +33 (66-33), Sanders +19 (42-23), Powers +26 (56-30), Cloud +34 (71-37), Meesseman +15 (49-34), Walker-Kimbrough +3 (43-40), Hawkins -2 (39-41), Peddy -5 (30-35), Mestdagh +3 (28-25), Hines-Allen -2 (21-23)

Atlanta 77, Dallas 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 77, Dallas 75
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .402, Dallas .598
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 11, Dallas 19
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 32, Dallas 34
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 8, Dallas 16
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 5, Dallas 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 100.0, Dallas 97.3
Effective FG%: Atlanta .482, Dallas .375
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .195, Dallas .173
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .185, Dallas .381
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .411, Dallas .264
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hayes +14 (68-54), Breland +8 (58-50), Williams +5 (51-46), Sykes +1 (33-32), Montgomery +15 (61-46), Bentley -1 (37-38), Billings -4 (19-23), Coates -3 (24-27), Cazorla 0 (12-12), Coffey -15 (22-37)
Dallas: Gray -1 (71-72), Thornton -2 (67-69), Harrison -2 (41-43), Davis -1 (42-43), Ogunbowale -4 (71-75), Johnson -12 (19-31), McGee-Stafford -2 (2-4), McCarty-Williams 0 (4-4), Anigwe +10 (44-34), Gustafson -6 (4-10)

Los Angeles 84, Connecticut 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, Los Angeles 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .594, Los Angeles .406
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 17, Los Angeles 18
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 34, Los Angeles 30
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 21, Los Angeles 6
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 14, Los Angeles 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 92.3, Los Angeles 107.7
Effective FG%: Connecticut .471, Los Angeles .555
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, Los Angeles .179
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .303, Los Angeles .115
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .118, Los Angeles .203
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen -11 (46-57), A.Thomas -2 (51-53), J.Jones -7 (67-74), Williams -9 (64-73), J.Thomas -14 (64-78), Holmes -4 (34-38), Tuck -9 (24-33), Plaisance -6 (0-6), Hiedeman +1 (5-4), B.Jones +1 (5-4)
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt -6 (34-40), Parker +13 (65-52), N.Ogwumike +17 (69-52), Williams +10 (55-45), Gray +14 (76-62), Beard +14 (38-24), C.Ogwumike +4 (24-20), Vadeeva -6 (10-16), Wiese +13 (47-34), Jones -5 (2-7), Mabrey -4 (0-4), Brown -4 (0-4)

Chicago 94, Phoenix 86
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 86, Phoenix 85
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .603, Phoenix .397
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 8, Phoenix 10
Points in the Paint: Chicago 44, Phoenix 44
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 15, Phoenix 7
Fast Break Points: Chicago 12, Phoenix 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 109.3, Phoenix 101.2
Effective FG%: Chicago .452, Phoenix .463
Turnover Pct: Chicago .093, Phoenix .129
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .341, Phoenix .135
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .214, Phoenix .358
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: DeShields +14 (86-72), Ndour +7 (66-59), Dolson +4 (64-60), Quigley +15 (79-64), Vandersloot +13 (79-66), Parker +5 (58-53), Copper -9 (15-24), Williams -7 (15-22), Samuelson -2 (8-10)
Phoenix: Bonner -11 (76-87), B.Turner -18 (49-67), Griner -7 (77-84), Taurasi -11 (47-58), Mitchell -5 (60-65), January -2 (36-38), Lyttle +9 (27-18), Y.Turner +3 (31-28), Little 0 (19-19), Cunningham +2 (8-6)

Minnesota 98, Las Vegas 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Las Vegas 78, Minnesota 78
Rebound Percentage: Las Vegas .509, Minnesota .491
Points Off Turnovers: Las Vegas 13, Minnesota 30
Points in the Paint: Las Vegas 32, Minnesota 50
2nd-Chance Points: Las Vegas 8, Minnesota 13
Fast Break Points: Las Vegas 14, Minnesota 21
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Las Vegas 98.7, Minnesota 125.6
Effective FG%: Las Vegas .457, Minnesota .632
Turnover Pct: Las Vegas .205, Minnesota .141
Offensive Reb%: Las Vegas .258, Minnesota .240
Free Throw Rate: Las Vegas .203, Minnesota .176
Individual Plus/Minus:
Las Vegas: McBride -29 (36-65), Wilson -18 (43-61), Cambage -25 (35-60), J.Young -19 (53-72), Plum -16 (16-32), T.Young -2 (45-47), Hamby -3 (61-64), Colson +3 (37-34), Rodgers +3 (28-25), Swords -4 (18-22), Park +5 (13-8)
Minnesota: Collier +24 (89-65), Dantas +21 (61-40), Fowles +26 (66-40), Sims +17 (64-47), Robinson +21 (88-67), Talbot -6 (27-33), Brown +4 (44-40), Fagbenle +3 (43-40), Carleton -5 (8-13)

Indiana 63, Seattle 54
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 74, Seattle 75
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .525, Seattle .475
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 6, Seattle 16
Points in the Paint: Indiana 30, Seattle 22
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 11, Seattle 6
Fast Break Points: Indiana 8, Seattle 16
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 85.1, Seattle 72.0
Effective FG%: Indiana .407, Seattle .325
Turnover Pct: Indiana .216, Seattle .213
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .323, Seattle .273
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .254, Seattle .206
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Burke +5 (34-29), Dupree +4 (54-50), McCowan +12 (58-46), T.Mitchell +8 (52-44), Wheeler -6 (24-30), K.Mitchell +16 (40-24), Achonwa +2 (14-12), Laney +4 (39-35)
Seattle: Clark -3 (38-41), Howard -6 (54-60), Russell -4 (35-39), Loyd -1 (34-35), Canada -5 (44-49), Langhorne -5 (19-24), Mosqueda-Lewis -6 (20-26), Whitcomb -8 (16-24), Zellous -4 (10-14), Paris -3 (0-3)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 25) here or here.

Inside the Box Score: August 23

Connecticut 89, Las Vegas 85
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Las Vegas 85, Connecticut 85
Rebound Percentage: Las Vegas .462, Connecticut .538
Points Off Turnovers: Las Vegas 8, Connecticut 13
Points in the Paint: Las Vegas 50, Connecticut 40
2nd-Chance Points: Las Vegas 6, Connecticut 7
Fast Break Points: Las Vegas 21, Connecticut 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Las Vegas 100.0, Connecticut 104.7
Effective FG%: Las Vegas .465, Connecticut .514
Turnover Pct: Las Vegas .118, Connecticut .118
Offensive Reb%: Las Vegas .118, Connecticut .194
Free Throw Rate: Las Vegas .268, Connecticut .225
Individual Plus/Minus:
Las Vegas: McBride -4 (63-67), Wilson -5 (56-61), Cambage -2 (62-64), J.Young -14 (43-57), Plum -16 (46-62), T.Young +5 (41-36), Hamby +6 (62-56), Colson +10 (35-25), Swords 0 (0-0), Rodgers 0 (17-17)
Connecticut: Stricklen +12 (63-51), A.Thomas +4 (89-85), J.Jones +16 (60-44), Williams +11 (83-72), J.Thomas +2 (81-79), Plaisance -12 (22-34), Holmes -8 (19-27), B.Jones 0 (7-7), Tuck -5 (21-26)

Atlanta 90, New York 87
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 82, New York 83
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .464, New York .536
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 17, New York 17
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 24, New York 38
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 19, New York 10
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 4, New York 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 109.8, New York 104.8
Effective FG%: Atlanta .466, New York .473
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .134, New York .145
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .222, New York .294
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .301, New York .213
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hayes 0 (66-66), Breland +10 (87-77), Billings -16 (45-61), Sykes +11 (77-66), Montgomery +16 (84-68), Gülich +3 (30-27), Cazorla +3 (8-5), Bentley -14 (24-38), Coffey -5 (13-18), Coates +7 (16-9)
New York: Nurse -15 (43-58), Charles -16 (54-70), Zahui B. -6 (50-56), Wright +1 (47-46), Hartley -4 (58-62), Johannès -9 (34-43), Raincock-Ekunwe +12 (32-20), Allen +12 (44-32), Gray +4 (38-34), Boyd +6 (35-29)

Chicago 85, Washington 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 84, Chicago 83
Rebound Percentage: Washington .467, Chicago .533
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 14, Chicago 17
Points in the Paint: Washington 36, Chicago 40
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 13, Chicago 10
Fast Break Points: Washington 12, Chicago 17
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 92.9, Chicago 102.4
Effective FG%: Washington .411, Chicago .500
Turnover Pct: Washington .190, Chicago .205
Offensive Reb%: Washington .200, Chicago .267
Free Throw Rate: Washington .247, Chicago .214
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Atkins -8 (36-44), Delle Donne -6 (60-66), Sanders -5 (31-36), Powers +1 (70-69), Cloud -14 (59-73), Walker-Kimbrough +5 (63-58), Meesseman -5 (47-52), Hawkins -3 (24-27), Peddy 0 (0-0)
Chicago: DeShields +5 (67-62), Ndour +9 (56-47), Dolson 0 (53-53), Quigley +12 (60-48), Vandersloot +11 (65-54), Parker +5 (52-47), Williams 0 (33-33), Samuelson 0 (9-9), Copper -4 (30-34), Faulkner -3 (0-3)