Inside the Box Score: July 14

Los Angeles 76, Atlanta 71 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 82, Atlanta 82
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .478, Atlanta .522
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 15, Atlanta 6
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 36, Atlanta 32
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 15, Atlanta 13
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 6, Atlanta 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 92.7, Atlanta 86.6
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .379, Atlanta .342
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .061, Atlanta .171
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .314, Atlanta .357
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .115, Atlanta .250
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt +9 (64-55), N.Ogwumike +5 (62-57), C.Ogwumike +3 (51-48), Williams +1 (66-65), Gray +12 (72-60), Brown 0 (31-31), Mabrey +2 (26-24), Wiese -7 (8-15)
Atlanta: Hayes 0 (64-64), Breland -4 (21-25), Williams -10 (46-56), Sykes -6 (34-40), Montgomery -8 (50-58), Billings -1 (50-51), Gülich +5 (25-20), Bentley -4 (40-44), Cazorla +3 (25-22)

Connecticut 76, Indiana 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 77, Indiana 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .493, Indiana .507
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 18, Indiana 17
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 32, Indiana 22
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 6, Indiana 10
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 4, Indiana 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 98.7, Indiana 80.8
Effective FG%: Connecticut .522, Indiana .371
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .182, Indiana .179
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .229, Indiana .242
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .090, Indiana .274
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen +18 (51-33), A.Thomas +8 (47-39), J.Jones +16 (65-49), Williams +6 (53-47), J.Thomas +9 (60-51), Banham +7 (23-16), Holmes -5 (25-30), Tuck +5 (29-24), Hiedeman +4 (16-12), Anigwe -5 (2-7), B.Jones +2 (9-7)
Indiana: Laney -4 (58-62), Dupree -11 (49-60), Achonwa -4 (43-47), K.Mitchell -9 (53-62), Wheeler -1 (26-27), T.Mitchell -7 (32-39), McCowan -9 (27-36), Johnson -9 (18-27), Mavunga -2 (7-9), Burke -9 (2-11)

Chicago 89, Dallas 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 79, Dallas 78
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .440, Dallas .560
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 13, Dallas 13
Points in the Paint: Chicago 32, Dallas 34
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 5, Dallas 14
Fast Break Points: Chicago 20, Dallas 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 112.7, Dallas 101.3
Effective FG%: Chicago .595, Dallas .408
Turnover Pct: Chicago .139, Dallas .103
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .143, Dallas .262
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .222, Dallas .296
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: DeShields +21 (75-54), Lavender +18 (75-57), Dolson +3 (56-53), Quigley +11 (72-61), Vandersloot +4 (60-56), Copper -4 (29-33), Parker -5 (37-42), Williams -2 (31-33), Ndour +4 (10-6)
Dallas: Thornton -1 (67-68), Harrison +2 (68-66), McGee-Stafford 0 (30-30), Gray -8 (72-80), Ogunbowale -17 (57-74), Johnson -7 (41-48), Plaisance -11 (10-21), Davis -7 (45-52), McCarty-Williams -1 (5-6)

Minnesota 75, Phoenix 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 79, Minnesota 78
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .333, Minnesota .667
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 19, Minnesota 12
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 24, Minnesota 40
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 4, Minnesota 14
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Minnesota 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 78.5, Minnesota 96.2
Effective FG%: Phoenix .435, Minnesota .447
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .177, Minnesota .244
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .083, Minnesota .417
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .129, Minnesota .107
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Carson -10 (38-48), Bonner -7 (56-63), Griner -8 (55-63), Mitchell -13 (56-69), January -5 (41-46), Y.Turner -8 (14-22), Cunningham -9 (11-20), Little -9 (7-16), Smith +4 (32-28), B.Turner 0 (0-0)
Minnesota: Talbot +2 (52-50), Collier +8 (65-57), Fowles +7 (61-54), Sims +9 (66-57), Robinson +8 (56-48), Brown +9 (28-19), Fagbenle +19 (44-25), Taylor +3 (3-0), Bell 0 (0-0)

Seattle 78, New York 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 77, Seattle 78
Rebound Percentage: New York .452, Seattle .548
Points Off Turnovers: New York 16, Seattle 26
Points in the Paint: New York 22, Seattle 20
2nd-Chance Points: New York 5, Seattle 20
Fast Break Points: New York 3, Seattle 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 89.6, Seattle 100.0
Effective FG%: New York .404, Seattle .514
Turnover Pct: New York .260, Seattle .231
Offensive Reb%: New York .258, Seattle .355
Free Throw Rate: New York .404, Seattle .070
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Nurse -18 (41-59), Charles -25 (37-62), Zahui B. -14 (32-46), Hartley -14 (47-61), Boyd -14 (19-33), Johannès +15 (38-23), Wright -7 (29-36), Gray 0 (13-13), Raincock-Ekunwe +10 (24-14), Allen +8 (39-31), Han +14 (26-12)
Seattle: Clark +26 (66-40), Howard +24 (55-31), Russell -2 (27-29), Whitcomb +25 (53-28), Canada +15 (64-49), Mosqueda-Lewis -17 (31-48), Langhorne +3 (53-50), Zellous -16 (16-32), Paris -7 (21-28), Dietrick -6 (4-10)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 14) here or here.

Advertisements

Inside the Box Score: July 13

Las Vegas 85, Washington 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Las Vegas 81, Washington 81
Rebound Percentage: Las Vegas .529, Washington .471
Points Off Turnovers: Las Vegas 13, Washington 13
Points in the Paint: Las Vegas 44, Washington 30
2nd-Chance Points: Las Vegas 17, Washington 11
Fast Break Points: Las Vegas 6, Washington 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Las Vegas 104.9, Washington 100.0
Effective FG%: Las Vegas .457, Washington .438
Turnover Pct: Las Vegas .198, Washington .136
Offensive Reb%: Las Vegas .344, Washington .286
Free Throw Rate: Las Vegas .300, Washington .250
Individual Plus/Minus:
Las Vegas: McBride -5 (68-73), Wilson +2 (65-63), Cambage -6 (56-62), J.Young 0 (38-38), Plum -5 (43-48), Rodgers +5 (26-21), T.Young +4 (29-25), Hamby +8 (34-26), Colson +15 (53-38), Park +2 (13-11)
Washington: Atkins +12 (50-38), Meesseman +7 (72-65), Sanders +3 (69-66), Cloud -2 (81-83), Toliver +10 (67-57), Hawkins -15 (19-34), Powers -16 (31-47), Walker-Kimbrough -16 (14-30), Hines-Allen -3 (2-5)

Inside the Box Score: July 12

Los Angeles 90, Indiana 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 82, Indiana 80
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .467, Indiana .533
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 27, Indiana 19
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 36, Indiana 30
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 21, Indiana 14
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 17, Indiana 16
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 109.8, Indiana 105.0
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .481, Indiana .522
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .171, Indiana .250
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .371, Indiana .438
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .192, Indiana .174
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt +6 (54-48), N.Ogwumike +4 (73-69), C.Ogwumike +22 (76-54), Williams +31 (54-23), Gray +17 (75-58), Beard +4 (20-16), Brown -14 (31-45), Wiese -20 (38-58), Mabrey -20 (29-49)
Indiana: Laney -12 (31-43), Dupree -14 (26-40), Achonwa -20 (26-46), K.Mitchell -14 (37-51), Wheeler -16 (38-54), McCowan -4 (42-46), T.Mitchell -9 (47-56), Johnson +18 (44-26), Burke +2 (32-30), McCall +11 (39-28), Kea +13 (23-10), Mavunga +15 (35-20)

Atlanta 60, Minnesota 53
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 68, Atlanta 69
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .468, Atlanta .532
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 11, Atlanta 14
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 24, Atlanta 26
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 8, Atlanta 13
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 8, Atlanta 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 77.9, Atlanta 87.0
Effective FG%: Minnesota .377, Atlanta .366
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .206, Atlanta .174
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .293, Atlanta .357
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .062, Atlanta .113
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Talbot +2 (34-32), Collier -3 (39-42), Fowles +3 (40-37), Sims -7 (48-55), Robinson -9 (44-53), Taylor -8 (13-21), Coates -10 (13-23), Brown +1 (25-24), Bell -4 (9-13)
Atlanta: Hayes +4 (52-48), Breland +5 (35-30), Williams +10 (58-48), Sykes +3 (45-42), Montgomery +12 (41-29), Bentley +3 (26-23), Gülich -3 (2-5), Cazorla -1 (16-17), Billings +2 (25-23)

Connecticut 79, Phoenix 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 75, Connecticut 76
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .369, Connecticut .631
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 12, Connecticut 18
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 38, Connecticut 44
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 9, Connecticut 15
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Connecticut 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 85.3, Connecticut 103.9
Effective FG%: Phoenix .429, Connecticut .474
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .173, Connecticut .224
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .167, Connecticut .429
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .159, Connecticut .092
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Taurasi -4 (28-32), Bonner -12 (56-68), Griner -24 (47-71), Mitchell -19 (24-43), January +3 (51-48), Lyttle -7 (12-19), Y.Turner -18 (13-31), Carson 0 (38-38), Little +2 (37-35), Cunningham 0 (6-6), Smith +2 (4-2), B.Turner +2 (4-2)
Connecticut: Stricklen +15 (60-45), A.Thomas +19 (66-47), J.Jones +14 (61-47), Williams +17 (52-35), J.Thomas +20 (75-55), Anigwe -1 (16-17), Tuck -4 (13-17), Holmes +1 (34-33), Banham -3 (12-15), Hiedeman -5 (4-9), B.Jones +2 (2-0)

Chicago 99, New York 83
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 86, Chicago 87
Rebound Percentage: New York .544, Chicago .456
Points Off Turnovers: New York 10, Chicago 17
Points in the Paint: New York 38, Chicago 46
2nd-Chance Points: New York 17, Chicago 15
Fast Break Points: New York 4, Chicago 23
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 96.5, Chicago 113.8
Effective FG%: New York .436, Chicago .579
Turnover Pct: New York .198, Chicago .138
Offensive Reb%: New York .250, Chicago .161
Free Throw Rate: New York .314, Chicago .257
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Nurse -16 (57-73), Charles -25 (44-69), Zahui B. -17 (43-60), Hartley -27 (54-81), Boyd -16 (37-53), Wright -1 (35-36), Gray -7 (33-40), Johannès +12 (40-28), Allen 0 (26-26), Han +6 (26-20), Raincock-Ekunwe +11 (20-9)
Chicago: DeShields +13 (57-44), Lavender +36 (78-42), Dolson +39 (79-40), Quigley +14 (65-51), Vandersloot +33 (88-55), Copper -5 (36-41), Williams +8 (44-36), Parker -16 (16-32), Ndour -18 (14-32), Faulkner -9 (9-18), Samuelson -11 (9-20), Jackson -4 (0-4)

Seattle 95, Dallas 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 78, Seattle 78
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .496, Seattle .504
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 22, Seattle 23
Points in the Paint: Dallas 26, Seattle 32
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 11, Seattle 5
Fast Break Points: Dallas 4, Seattle 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 103.8, Seattle 121.8
Effective FG%: Dallas .638, Seattle .661
Turnover Pct: Dallas .244, Seattle .205
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .214, Seattle .222
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .121, Seattle .210
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Thornton -17 (50-67), Johnson -9 (73-82), Plaisance -14 (27-41), Gray -19 (65-84), Ogunbowale -5 (65-70), Davis 0 (53-53), McGee-Stafford -8 (44-52), McCarty-Williams -1 (17-18), Gustafson +3 (11-8)
Seattle: Clark +26 (61-35), Howard +19 (76-57), Russell +22 (68-46), Whitcomb +22 (68-46), Canada +21 (75-54), Langhorne -5 (29-34), Zellous -6 (24-30), Mosqueda-Lewis -10 (43-53), Dietrick -11 (14-25), Paris -8 (17-25)

Inside the Box Score: July 10

Atlanta 78, Connecticut 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 81, Atlanta 81
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .474, Atlanta .526
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 19, Atlanta 13
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 30, Atlanta 28
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 12, Atlanta 16
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 14, Atlanta 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 92.6, Atlanta 96.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .441, Atlanta .476
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .198, Atlanta .247
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .300, Atlanta .353
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .221, Atlanta .306
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Stricklen -2 (19-21), A.Thomas -12 (59-71), J.Jones -7 (51-58), Williams -2 (38-40), J.Thomas -13 (48-61), Banham +5 (31-26), Holmes -1 (56-57), Anigwe +4 (24-20), Hiedeman +4 (33-29), Tuck +9 (16-7)
Atlanta: Hayes -1 (62-63), Breland +2 (45-43), Williams +6 (58-52), Sykes +5 (46-41), Montgomery +2 (66-64), Gülich -3 (20-23), Billings +1 (33-32), Bentley 0 (36-36), Cazorla +3 (24-21)

Phoenix 91, Washington 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 75, Washington 74
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .507, Washington .493
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 6, Washington 6
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 38, Washington 36
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 15, Washington 9
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Washington 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 121.3, Washington 91.9
Effective FG%: Phoenix .597, Washington .450
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .093, Washington .135
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .219, Washington .205
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .069, Washington .071
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Carson -4 (20-24), Bonner +24 (80-56), Griner +17 (74-57), Mitchell +8 (59-51), January +22 (80-58), Lyttle +19 (46-27), Y.Turner +12 (39-27), Cunningham +6 (19-13), Little +5 (30-25), B.Turner +2 (4-2), Smith +4 (4-0)
Washington: Atkins -17 (43-60), Hawkins -19 (62-81), Sanders -12 (51-63), Cloud -20 (54-74), Toliver -12 (51-63), Walker-Kimbrough -12 (29-41), Powers -8 (29-37), Hines-Allen -13 (19-32), Peddy -2 (2-4)

Las Vegas 74, Indiana 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Las Vegas 81, Indiana 81
Rebound Percentage: Las Vegas .506, Indiana .494
Points Off Turnovers: Las Vegas 15, Indiana 3
Points in the Paint: Las Vegas 28, Indiana 24
2nd-Chance Points: Las Vegas 7, Indiana 8
Fast Break Points: Las Vegas 7, Indiana 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Las Vegas 91.4, Indiana 87.7
Effective FG%: Las Vegas .412, Indiana .412
Turnover Pct: Las Vegas .136, Indiana .136
Offensive Reb%: Las Vegas .179, Indiana .167
Free Throw Rate: Las Vegas .176, Indiana .221
Individual Plus/Minus:
Las Vegas: McBride +6 (60-54), Wilson 0 (53-53), Cambage +1 (45-44), J.Young +1 (31-30), Plum +3 (55-52), T.Young +2 (23-21), Hamby 0 (30-30), Colson -2 (25-27), Rodgers -1 (28-29), Swords +5 (20-15)
Indiana: Laney -4 (60-64), Dupree -3 (61-64), McCowan -1 (51-52), K.Mitchell +6 (55-49), Wheeler -5 (51-56), T.Mitchell +2 (27-25), Achonwa +3 (27-24), Burke -5 (4-9), Johnson -3 (16-19), Mavunga -5 (3-8)

Minnesota 73, Chicago 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 77, Chicago 78
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .546, Chicago .454
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 12, Chicago 11
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 34, Chicago 26
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 12, Chicago 13
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Chicago 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 94.8, Chicago 92.3
Effective FG%: Minnesota .391, Chicago .425
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .117, Chicago .179
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .302, Chicago .211
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .154, Chicago .137
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Talbot +5 (55-50), Collier +4 (66-62), Fowles +11 (50-39), Sims +6 (61-55), Robinson +6 (64-58), Brown -10 (21-31), Coates -7 (15-22), Taylor -10 (33-43)
Chicago: DeShields -6 (50-56), Lavender -7 (24-31), Dolson -5 (38-43), Quigley +2 (66-64), Vandersloot -12 (41-53), Parker 0 (37-37), Copper +12 (49-37), Williams +11 (55-44)

Inside the Box Score: July 9

Dallas 74, Los Angeles 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 75, Dallas 75
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .576, Dallas .424
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 20, Dallas 21
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 38, Dallas 36
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 14, Dallas 6
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 14, Dallas 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 82.7, Dallas 98.7
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .394, Dallas .516
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .320, Dallas .240
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .447, Dallas .296
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .085, Dallas .161
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ruffin-Pratt -13 (21-34), Parker -2 (12-14), N.Ogwumike -19 (41-60), Williams -13 (49-62), Gray -16 (48-64), Beard +2 (33-31), C.Ogwumike -12 (41-53), Brown +9 (30-21), Wiese +1 (16-15), Mabrey +3 (19-16)
Dallas: Thornton +9 (58-49), Johnson +7 (49-42), Harrison +5 (43-38), Gray +10 (39-29), Ogunbowale +12 (56-44), Plaisance +4 (23-19), Davis +5 (51-46), McGee-Stafford +8 (33-25), McCarty-Williams 0 (18-18)