Inside the Box Score: June 29

Connecticut 77, Washington 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 69, Washington 69
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .470, Washington .530
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 12, Washington 11
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 30, Washington 30
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, Washington 26
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 9, Washington 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 111.6, Washington 92.8
Effective FG%: Connecticut .483, Washington .351
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .188, Washington .159
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .345, Washington .405
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .362, Washington .130
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene +21 (46-25), Jones +13 (64-51), Charles +15 (58-43), Hightower +22 (40-18), Lawson +14 (54-40), Mims -2 (32-34), Montgomery -8 (39-47), White -5 (37-42), McCray -5 (15-20)
Washington: Quinn -14 (19-33), Langhorne -5 (46-51), Snow -15 (21-36), Ajavon -15 (31-46), Bobbitt -14 (51-65), Currie +2 (54-52), Wisdom-Hylton -4 (33-37), Thomas +1 (13-12), Robinson -2 (28-30), Novosel +1 (24-23)

Atlanta 102, Tulsa 92
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 85, Tulsa 84
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .550, Tulsa .449
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 9, Tulsa 23
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 50, Tulsa 44
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 10, Tulsa 18
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 15, Tulsa 18
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 120.0, Tulsa 109.5
Effective FG%: Atlanta .656, Tulsa .454
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .235, Tulsa .107
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .417, Tulsa .316
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .281, Tulsa .303
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +14 (77-63), Henry +4 (65-61), Lyttle +20 (72-52), Price +11 (83-72), Harding +17 (82-65), Leuchanka +6 (25-19), Swanier -7 (20-27), Hayes -2 (41-43), Kraayeveld -6 (39-45), Moore -4 (3-7), Koehn -3 (3-6)
Tulsa: Christmas -17 (17-34), Pedersen -13 (59-72), G.Johnson -1 (68-69), Latta -20 (61-81), T.Johnson -11 (69-80), Williams +7 (57-50), Holt +11 (72-61), Black +3 (32-29), Paris -9 (25-34)

Phoenix 84, Chicago 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 76, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .633, Chicago .366
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 15, Chicago 16
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 38, Chicago 26
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 15, Chicago 6
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 9, Chicago 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 110.5, Chicago 105.2
Effective FG%: Phoenix .515, Chicago .492
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .237, Chicago .130
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .486, Chicago .219
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .262, Chicago .262
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Houston +4 (62-58), Bonner +11 (84-73), Thomas +2 (72-70), Hornbuckle +6 (62-56), Prahalis +5 (72-67), Warley -4 (44-48), Gray-Lawson -7 (12-19), Riley -2 (12-14)
Chicago: Petrovic -9 (40-49), Cash 0 (77-77), Fowles -5 (72-77), Young 0 (63-63), Vandersloot -8 (49-57), Penicheiro +5 (32-27), Riley -2 (20-22), Murphy +10 (45-35), Willingham -6 (7-13)

Inside the Box Score: June 28

San Antonio 94, Los Angeles 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 76, San Antonio 77
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .530, San Antonio .469
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 12, San Antonio 24
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 42, San Antonio 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 12, San Antonio 12
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 12, San Antonio 18
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 105.3, San Antonio 122.1
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .538, San Antonio .554
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .224, San Antonio .130
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .355, San Antonio .294
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .154, San Antonio .162
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones -23 (57-80), Ogwumike -4 (63-67), Parker -10 (67-77), Beard -16 (67-83), Toliver -25 (29-54), Lavender -8 (22-30), Sykes +16 (57-41), Coleman +8 (29-21), Miller -8 (9-17)
San Antonio: Christon +26 (65-39), Young +24 (75-51), Appel +15 (48-33), Hammon +24 (71-47), Robinson +14 (60-46), Adams -5 (49-54), Perkins -5 (49-54), Johnson -11 (35-46), Morrison -5 (11-16), Bevilaqua -7 (7-14)

Inside the Box Score: June 27

Indiana 81, Chicago 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 75, Chicago 75
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .466, Chicago .533
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 12, Chicago 8
Points in the Paint: Indiana 28, Chicago 32
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 7, Chicago 12
Fast Break Points: Indiana 8, Chicago 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 108.0, Chicago 96.0
Effective FG%: Indiana .540, Chicago .483
Turnover Pct: Indiana .133, Chicago .200
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .233, Chicago .300
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .226, Chicago .276
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Douglas +15 (50-35), Catchings +9 (70-61), Sutton-Brown +12 (62-50), Zellous +13 (73-60), January +9 (57-48), Davenport -6 (12-18), Phillips -4 (28-32), Pohlen -6 (35-41), Larkins 0 (11-11), Goodlett +3 (7-4)
Chicago: Cash -9 (68-77), Riley -14 (24-38), Fowles -11 (64-75), Young -19 (60-79), Vandersloot -3 (45-48), Penicheiro -6 (27-33), Petrovic +11 (47-36), Swords +4 (8-4), Murphy +2 (17-15)

Minnesota 96, Phoenix 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 87, Minnesota 87
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .419, Minnesota .580
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 15, Minnesota 15
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 24, Minnesota 42
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 8, Minnesota 13
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 11, Minnesota 27
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 92.0, Minnesota 110.3
Effective FG%: Phoenix .412, Minnesota .487
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .161, Minnesota .149
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .200, Minnesota .361
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .257, Minnesota .256
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Houston -15 (62-77), Bonner -14 (69-83), Thomas -11 (34-45), Hornbuckle -17 (49-66), Prahalis -20 (54-74), Warley -8 (53-61), Gray-Lawson +5 (47-42), Riley 0 (32-32)
Minnesota: Moore +18 (71-53), Brunson +14 (52-38), McWilliams-Franklin +23 (76-53), Augustus +7 (56-49), Whalen +16 (54-38), Harris +1 (38-37), Wiggins +2 (46-44), Wright +3 (50-47), Peters -6 (26-32), Thorn +2 (11-9)

Inside the Box Score: June 26

Atlanta 70, Indiana 58
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 80, Atlanta 80
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .441, Atlanta .559
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 9, Atlanta 11
Points in the Paint: Indiana 22, Atlanta 24
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 16, Atlanta 7
Fast Break Points: Indiana 7, Atlanta 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 72.5, Atlanta 87.5
Effective FG%: Indiana .339, Atlanta .405
Turnover Pct: Indiana .238, Atlanta .175
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .132, Atlanta .250
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .258, Atlanta .302
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Douglas -20 (35-55), Catchings -17 (30-47), Sutton-Brown -5 (28-33), Zellous -3 (34-37), January -8 (44-52), Larkins +5 (28-23), Davenport -7 (21-28), Phillips -8 (33-41), Pohlen +2 (18-16), Goodlett 0 (9-9), Hodges +1 (10-9)
Atlanta: McCoughtry +8 (55-47), Henry -1 (31-32), Lyttle +4 (56-52), Price -10 (26-36), Swanier -1 (18-19), Harding +13 (52-39), Hayes +18 (51-33), Leuchanka +13 (21-8), Kraayeveld +16 (40-24)

Seattle 79, Washington 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 76, Washington 76
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .431, Washington .569
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 18, Washington 18
Points in the Paint: Seattle 24, Washington 30
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 6, Washington 15
Fast Break Points: Seattle 8, Washington 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 103.9, Washington 93.4
Effective FG%: Seattle .480, Washington .450
Turnover Pct: Seattle .197, Washington .211
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .185, Washington .323
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .588, Washington .283
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Smith +2 (55-53), Little +15 (67-52), Wauters +5 (51-46), Wright +9 (76-67), Bird +11 (73-62), Stricklen -1 (25-26), Thompson -1 (26-27), Kobryn 0 (22-22)
Washington: Quinn -13 (13-26), Langhorne -6 (68-74), Snow -10 (39-49), Ajavon -11 (9-20), Thomas -4 (13-17), Bobbitt -4 (58-62), Currie +3 (59-56), Lacy +5 (61-56), Robinson -2 (3-5), Wisdom-Hylton +2 (32-30)

Tulsa 91, Los Angeles 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 85, Tulsa 84
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .478, Tulsa .522
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 17, Tulsa 27
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 24, Tulsa 46
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 6, Tulsa 9
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 10, Tulsa 22
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 88.2, Tulsa 108.3
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .500, Tulsa .547
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .282, Tulsa .202
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .214, Tulsa .258
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .154, Tulsa .120
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones -11 (51-62), Ogwumike -20 (45-65), Parker -27 (23-50), Beard -16 (40-56), Toliver -17 (60-77), Lavender +8 (54-46), Sykes -1 (41-42), Miller +5 (13-8), Coleman -1 (48-49)
Tulsa: Christmas -2 (18-20), Pedersen +11 (43-32), G.Johnson +15 (61-46), Latta +14 (78-64), T.Johnson +9 (62-53), Williams +19 (61-42), Paris -1 (26-27), Holt +13 (54-41), Black +2 (52-50)

Inside the Box Score: June 24

Atlanta 74, New York 64
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 83, New York 81
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .457, New York .543
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 31, New York 9
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 30, New York 34
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 18, New York 16
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 8, New York 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 89.2, New York 79.0
Effective FG%: Atlanta .407, New York .379
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .193, New York .321
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .343, New York .429
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .243, New York .157
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +14 (70-56), Henry +7 (42-35), Lyttle +20 (62-42), Price +7 (63-56), Swanier +10 (38-28), Leuchanka +2 (34-32), Hayes +2 (15-13), Harding 0 (36-36), Moore -4 (5-9), Kraayeveld -5 (5-10), Koehn -3 (0-3)
New York: Carson -3 (36-39), Walker +6 (52-46), Vaughn -21 (41-62), Pondexter -7 (60-67), Mitchell -10 (54-64), Braxton -2 (26-28), Powell -2 (40-42), Montgomery -6 (0-6), Cain -3 (9-12), Miller -2 (2-4)

San Antonio 91, Los Angeles 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 79, Los Angeles 78
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .469, Los Angeles .531
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 14, Los Angeles 16
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 44, Los Angeles 42
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 16, Los Angeles 6
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 15, Los Angeles 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 115.2, Los Angeles 91.0
Effective FG%: San Antonio .542, Los Angeles .420
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .114, Los Angeles .141
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .242, Los Angeles .304
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .181, Los Angeles .107
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Christon +16 (63-47), Young +24 (81-57), Appel +9 (55-46), Hammon +16 (78-62), Robinson +23 (75-52), Adams +14 (42-28), Perkins +7 (28-21), Johnson +1 (26-25), Bevilaqua -3 (3-6), Morrison -7 (4-11)
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones -10 (42-52), Ogwumike -16 (62-78), Parker -17 (62-79), Beard -20 (48-68), Toliver -22 (53-75), Lavender -9 (10-19), Coleman -5 (27-32), Sykes -1 (36-37), Miller 0 (15-15)

Seattle 72, Washington 55
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 64, Seattle 62
Rebound Percentage: Washington .635, Seattle .364
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 7, Seattle 20
Points in the Paint: Washington 18, Seattle 30
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 15, Seattle 5
Fast Break Points: Washington 0, Seattle 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 85.9, Seattle 116.1
Effective FG%: Washington .403, Seattle .615
Turnover Pct: Washington .188, Seattle .194
Offensive Reb%: Washington .382, Seattle .111
Free Throw Rate: Washington .081, Seattle .271
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Quinn -3 (41-44), Langhorne -18 (48-66), Snow -4 (28-32), Ajavon +3 (36-34), Thomas -3 (28-31), Bobbitt -14 (27-41), Currie -21 (19-40), Wisdom-Hylton -11 (27-38), Robinson -1 (7-8), Lacy -9 (3-12), Novosel -3 (11-14)
Seattle: Smith +20 (60-40), Little +3 (42-39), Wauters +18 (51-33), Wright +6 (53-47), Bird +16 (58-42), Stricklen +8 (31-23), Thompson +10 (33-23), Kobryn +5 (22-17), Clark -1 (10-11)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through June 24) here.