Monthly Archives: August 2012

Inside the Box Score: August 30

Atlanta 82, Washington 59
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 81, Atlanta 80
Rebound Percentage: Washington .438, Atlanta .561
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 14, Atlanta 23
Points in the Paint: Washington 30, Atlanta 46
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 8, Atlanta 11
Fast Break Points: Washington 8, Atlanta 24
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 72.8, Atlanta 102.5
Effective FG%: Washington .381, Atlanta .430
Turnover Pct: Washington .247, Atlanta .188
Offensive Reb%: Washington .258, Atlanta .381
Free Throw Rate: Washington .237, Atlanta .296
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Currie -9 (40-49), Langhorne -14 (39-53), Snow -17 (14-31), Ajavon -16 (34-50), Thomas -19 (28-47), Wisdom-Hylton -10 (45-55), Bobbitt -3 (32-35), Castro Marques -2 (18-20), Robinson -5 (20-25), Quinn -9 (17-26), Novosel -11 (8-19)
Atlanta: Hayes +26 (68-42), Lyttle +18 (57-39), de Souza +19 (56-37), Price +17 (67-50), Harding +19 (70-51), Kraayeveld +6 (48-42), Henry +4 (26-22), Swanier +4 (12-8), Koehn +2 (6-4)

Indiana 76, New York 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 75, New York 75
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .446, New York .553
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 20, New York 11
Points in the Paint: Indiana 26, New York 36
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 4, New York 9
Fast Break Points: Indiana 8, New York 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 101.3, New York 84.0
Effective FG%: Indiana .508, New York .508
Turnover Pct: Indiana .133, New York .293
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .152, New York .259
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .230, New York .033
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Douglas +11 (56-45), Catchings +13 (61-48), Sutton-Brown +7 (19-12), Zellous +12 (52-40), January +8 (50-42), Davenport +3 (40-37), Phillips +7 (46-39), Larkins +3 (32-29), Pohlen +1 (24-23)
New York: Powell -5 (45-50), Pierson -9 (45-54), Vaughn -6 (32-38), Pondexter -14 (56-70), Mitchell -5 (40-45), Carson -12 (46-58), Walker -3 (4-7), Montgomery -4 (16-20), Braxton -7 (31-38)

Connecticut 84, San Antonio 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, San Antonio 77
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .526, San Antonio .473
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 17, San Antonio 6
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 24, San Antonio 34
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 13, San Antonio 16
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 11, San Antonio 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 107.7, San Antonio 94.8
Effective FG%: Connecticut .416, San Antonio .485
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .103, San Antonio .208
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .326, San Antonio .273
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .260, San Antonio .136
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene -6 (39-45), Griffin +4 (69-65), Charles +8 (71-63), Hightower +6 (64-58), Lawson +13 (58-45), Moore +2 (18-16), White +6 (28-22), Montgomery 0 (35-35), McCray +22 (38-16)
San Antonio: Christon +1 (43-42), Young +5 (69-64), Appel -3 (16-19), Hammon -5 (63-68), Robinson +6 (69-63), Adams 0 (52-52), Perkins -17 (30-47), Johnson -18 (14-32), Smith -18 (9-27), Morrison -6 (0-6)

Tulsa 99, Los Angeles 85
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 82, Tulsa 82
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .504, Tulsa .495
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 13, Tulsa 27
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 42, Tulsa 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 8, Tulsa 11
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 15, Tulsa 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 103.7, Tulsa 120.7
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .500, Tulsa .611
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .220, Tulsa .171
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .333, Tulsa .324
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .164, Tulsa .153
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones -14 (54-68), Ogwumike -2 (65-67), Parker -7 (57-64), Beard -12 (81-93), Toliver -18 (66-84), Coleman -5 (24-29), Lavender -6 (26-32), Sykes +2 (21-19), Hoffman -3 (22-25), Anosike -5 (9-14)
Tulsa: Holt +22 (83-61), G.Johnson +8 (55-47), Black +17 (76-59), Hodges +10 (78-68), Latta +13 (93-80), Lacy +14 (63-49), Williams +1 (37-36), Dorrell -6 (6-12), Paris -9 (4-13)

Phoenix 75, Seattle 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 79, Seattle 78
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .503, Seattle .497
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 16, Seattle 10
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 26, Seattle 18
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 12, Seattle 13
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 9, Seattle 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 94.9, Seattle 87.2
Effective FG%: Phoenix .447, Seattle .403
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .152, Seattle .192
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .256, Seattle .250
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .242, Seattle .209
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Taurasi +16 (56-40), Bonner +12 (70-58), Thomas +4 (40-36), Hornbuckle +3 (56-53), Prahalis +8 (66-58), Sanford -6 (22-28), Gilbreath -1 (37-38), Warley -1 (28-29)
Seattle: Smith -17 (28-45), Little -17 (42-59), Jackson -3 (38-41), Wright -6 (57-63), Bird -4 (62-66), Stricklen 0 (38-38), Wauters +1 (23-22), Thompson +6 (28-22), Abrosimova +6 (19-13), Kobryn -1 (5-6)

Inside the Box Score: August 28

Tulsa 84, Atlanta 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 83, Atlanta 84
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .491, Atlanta .508
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 25, Atlanta 16
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 22, Atlanta 40
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 4, Atlanta 18
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 12, Atlanta 15
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 101.2, Atlanta 95.2
Effective FG%: Tulsa .523, Atlanta .444
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .217, Atlanta .214
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .286, Atlanta .303
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .246, Atlanta .222
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Holt +8 (31-23), G.Johnson -7 (63-70), Black -1 (29-30), Hodges +7 (67-60), T.Johnson +5 (68-63), Lacy +1 (57-56), Latta -7 (50-57), Williams +2 (26-24), Dorrell -1 (12-13), Paris +13 (17-4)
Atlanta: Hayes -8 (57-65), Lyttle -10 (62-72), de Souza -1 (64-65), Price +2 (67-65), Harding 0 (63-63), Kraayeveld +12 (57-45), Swanier -4 (17-21), Henry -6 (13-19), Koehn -5 (0-5)

Indiana 83, Washington 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 70, Indiana 71
Rebound Percentage: Washington .468, Indiana .531
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 12, Indiana 21
Points in the Paint: Washington 26, Indiana 30
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 16, Indiana 11
Fast Break Points: Washington 6, Indiana 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 97.1, Indiana 116.9
Effective FG%: Washington .542, Indiana .625
Turnover Pct: Washington .229, Indiana .197
Offensive Reb%: Washington .241, Indiana .304
Free Throw Rate: Washington .050, Indiana .232
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Currie -3 (22-25), Langhorne -12 (42-54), Snow -11 (30-41), Ajavon -12 (34-46), Thomas -10 (34-44), Bobbitt -5 (34-39), Robinson -1 (34-35), Quinn -7 (34-41), Castro Marques -4 (24-28), Wisdom-Hylton -6 (30-36), Novosel -4 (22-26)
Indiana: Douglas +16 (62-46), Catchings +10 (55-45), Sutton-Brown -1 (14-15), Zellous +19 (64-45), January +5 (52-47), Davenport +14 (46-32), Phillips +11 (50-39), Christmas -6 (8-14), Larkins +7 (38-31), Pohlen 0 (13-13), Goodlett 0 (13-13)

Connecticut 83, Chicago 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .487, Chicago .513
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 17, Chicago 20
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 26, Chicago 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 12, Chicago 14
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 13, Chicago 11
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 106.4, Chicago 93.5
Effective FG%: Connecticut .492, Chicago .400
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, Chicago .195
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .333, Chicago .359
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .333, Chicago .229
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Greene +10 (37-27), Griffin +11 (71-60), Charles +14 (73-59), Hightower 0 (55-55), Lawson +9 (70-61), White +9 (40-31), Montgomery +4 (49-45), Mims -2 (8-10), Moore 0 (12-12)
Chicago: Murphy -14 (26-40), Cash -16 (46-62), Swords +4 (61-57), Prince -3 (55-58), Penicheiro -8 (14-22), Vandersloot -2 (58-60), Riley -15 (11-26), Petrovic +3 (46-43), Young -1 (14-15), Willingham -3 (29-32)

Minnesota 96, San Antonio 84 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 86, Minnesota 85
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .366, Minnesota .633
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 14, Minnesota 12
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 46, Minnesota 44
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 11, Minnesota 29
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Minnesota 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 97.7, Minnesota 112.9
Effective FG%: San Antonio .442, Minnesota .467
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .093, Minnesota .141
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .175, Minnesota .442
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .208, Minnesota .109
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Christon -12 (33-45), Young -7 (76-83), Appel -3 (38-41), Hammon -9 (73-82), Robinson -6 (76-82), Perkins -5 (56-61), Adams -8 (29-37), Johnson -4 (16-20), Smith -3 (10-13), Morrison -3 (13-16)
Minnesota: Moore +15 (73-58), Brunson +12 (84-72), McWilliams-Franklin +6 (67-61), Augustus +9 (80-71), Whalen +13 (74-61), Wiggins +4 (45-41), Wright +2 (21-19), Harris +1 (24-23), Peters 0 (12-12), Thorn -2 (0-2)

Inside the Box Score: August 26

Chicago 82, Connecticut 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 77, Connecticut 75
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .587, Connecticut .412
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 22, Connecticut 13
Points in the Paint: Chicago 28, Connecticut 28
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 9, Connecticut 7
Fast Break Points: Chicago 8, Connecticut 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 106.5, Connecticut 93.3
Effective FG%: Chicago .535, Connecticut .475
Turnover Pct: Chicago .208, Connecticut .227
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .387, Connecticut .212
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .085, Connecticut .197
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Murphy -11 (26-37), Cash +6 (52-46), Swords -2 (38-40), Prince +18 (74-56), Penicheiro -10 (13-23), Petrovic +30 (64-34), Riley +4 (32-28), Vandersloot +22 (69-47), Willingham +3 (42-39)
Connecticut: Greene +3 (26-23), Mims -1 (42-43), Charles +1 (62-61), Hightower -3 (58-61), Lawson +9 (65-56), Griffin -21 (32-53), Montgomery -23 (41-64), White -24 (13-37), Moore -3 (4-7), McCray +2 (7-5)

Seattle 84, New York 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 73, Seattle 72
Rebound Percentage: New York .478, Seattle .522
Points Off Turnovers: New York 20, Seattle 19
Points in the Paint: New York 30, Seattle 40
2nd-Chance Points: New York 16, Seattle 15
Fast Break Points: New York 4, Seattle 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 90.4, Seattle 116.7
Effective FG%: New York .419, Seattle .558
Turnover Pct: New York .205, Seattle .236
Offensive Reb%: New York .389, Seattle .433
Free Throw Rate: New York .132, Seattle .283
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Powell -10 (43-53), Pierson -27 (39-66), Vaughn -16 (22-38), Pondexter -23 (53-76), Mitchell -11 (43-54), Braxton -6 (37-43), Carson -4 (31-35), Montgomery -6 (22-28), Walker +8 (21-13), Cain +5 (13-8), Redmon 0 (6-6)
Seattle: Smith +6 (36-30), Little +33 (56-23), Jackson +29 (69-40), Wright +26 (51-25), Bird +29 (75-46), Stricklen +4 (48-44), Kobryn -7 (15-22), Abrosimova -6 (33-39), Thompson -9 (14-23), Wauters -8 (14-22), Clark -7 (9-16)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 26) here.

Inside the Box Score: August 25

Minnesota 84, Atlanta 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 83, Atlanta 83
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .556, Atlanta .444
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 15, Atlanta 13
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 30, Atlanta 26
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 12, Atlanta 7
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 14, Atlanta 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 101.2, Atlanta 89.2
Effective FG%: Minnesota .464, Atlanta .427
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .169, Atlanta .157
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .294, Atlanta .182
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .271, Atlanta .133
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore +14 (76-62), Brunson +9 (71-62), McWilliams-Franklin +9 (45-36), Augustus +9 (73-64), Whalen +7 (74-67), Wright 0 (18-18), Harris +2 (21-19), Wiggins +2 (23-21), Peters -2 (19-21), Adair 0 (0-0)
Atlanta: Hayes -10 (59-69), Lyttle -12 (57-69), de Souza -10 (33-43), Price -2 (21-23), Harding -2 (71-73), Kraayeveld +2 (58-56), Swanier -12 (3-15), McCoughtry +1 (41-40), Henry -3 (27-30), Koehn -2 (0-2)

San Antonio 91, Tulsa 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 75, San Antonio 73
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .358, San Antonio .642
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 12, San Antonio 25
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 34, San Antonio 34
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 5, San Antonio 18
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 14, San Antonio 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 94.7, San Antonio 124.7
Effective FG%: Tulsa .531, San Antonio .543
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .213, San Antonio .164
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .188, San Antonio .471
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .047, San Antonio .214
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Holt +3 (24-21), G.Johnson -10 (45-55), Black -4 (22-26), Hodges -26 (34-60), Latta -12 (57-69), Williams -18 (49-67), Lacy -18 (41-59), Dorrell -7 (49-56), Paris -8 (34-42)
San Antonio: Christon +5 (30-25), Young +19 (55-36), Appel +2 (31-29), Hammon +8 (53-45), Robinson +15 (59-44), Perkins +19 (73-54), Adams +15 (56-41), Johnson +16 (48-32), Smith +2 (27-25), Morrison +2 (13-11), Bevilaqua -3 (10-13)

Indiana 85, Phoenix 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 82, Phoenix 81
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .411, Phoenix .589
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 18, Phoenix 11
Points in the Paint: Indiana 32, Phoenix 26
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 4, Phoenix 14
Fast Break Points: Indiana 4, Phoenix 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 103.7, Phoenix 88.9
Effective FG%: Indiana .531, Phoenix .426
Turnover Pct: Indiana .159, Phoenix .198
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .188, Phoenix .366
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .246, Phoenix .122
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Douglas +16 (69-53), Catchings +26 (68-42), Sutton-Brown +1 (18-17), Zellous +4 (43-39), January 0 (54-54), Davenport +8 (53-45), Phillips +13 (53-40), Pohlen -2 (10-12), Larkins -8 (17-25), Goodlett -1 (14-15), Christmas +8 (26-18)
Phoenix: Taurasi -5 (46-51), Bonner -16 (51-67), Thomas -20 (51-71), Hornbuckle -7 (61-68), Prahalis -21 (43-64), Sanford +4 (33-29), Warley -3 (30-33), Gilbreath -1 (39-40), Simon +4 (6-2)

Los Angeles 87, New York 62
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 79, Los Angeles 80
Rebound Percentage: New York .534, Los Angeles .465
Points Off Turnovers: New York 6, Los Angeles 22
Points in the Paint: New York 32, Los Angeles 24
2nd-Chance Points: New York 9, Los Angeles 8
Fast Break Points: New York 8, Los Angeles 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 78.5, Los Angeles 108.8
Effective FG%: New York .403, Los Angeles .507
Turnover Pct: New York .266, Los Angeles .075
Offensive Reb%: New York .325, Los Angeles .256
Free Throw Rate: New York .119, Los Angeles .246
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Powell -22 (42-64), Pierson -17 (53-70), Vaughn -16 (35-51), Pondexter -20 (62-82), Mitchell -22 (34-56), Walker -3 (20-23), Carson -8 (37-45), Braxton -11 (16-27), Montgomery -3 (11-14), Cain -3 (0-3)
Los Angeles: Milton-Jones +24 (77-53), Ogwumike +26 (65-39), Parker +3 (49-46), Beard +16 (64-48), Toliver +20 (71-51), Coleman +17 (42-25), Lavender +1 (35-34), Sykes -2 (7-9), Hoffman +17 (22-5), Anosike +3 (3-0)

Inside the Box Score: August 24

Atlanta 81, Washington 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 79, Washington 80
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .517, Washington .483
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 25, Washington 18
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 40, Washington 28
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 10, Washington 12
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 16, Washington 17
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 102.5, Washington 86.3
Effective FG%: Atlanta .551, Washington .444
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .241, Washington .225
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .267, Washington .233
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .271, Washington .226
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Hayes +11 (56-45), Lyttle +20 (73-53), de Souza +7 (58-51), Price +16 (73-57), Harding +15 (67-52), Kraayeveld -7 (41-48), Swanier -3 (14-17), Henry +1 (23-22)
Washington: Currie -13 (30-43), Langhorne -17 (46-63), Snow -12 (24-36), Quinn -11 (26-37), Thomas -17 (28-45), Ajavon -10 (49-59), Wisdom-Hylton -1 (32-33), Bobbitt +5 (41-36), Novosel +10 (33-23), Robinson +6 (36-30)

Tulsa 81, Chicago 78 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 85, Tulsa 83
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .535, Tulsa .465
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 11, Tulsa 28
Points in the Paint: Chicago 24, Tulsa 26
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 8, Tulsa 16
Fast Break Points: Chicago 11, Tulsa 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 91.8, Tulsa 97.6
Effective FG%: Chicago .523, Tulsa .472
Turnover Pct: Chicago .271, Tulsa .169
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .333, Tulsa .263
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .136, Tulsa .197
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +3 (21-18), Cash -3 (67-70), Fowles 0 (33-33), Murphy -3 (62-65), Penicheiro +3 (21-18), Prince -11 (50-61), Riley -3 (13-16), Vandersloot -6 (57-63), Petrovic +1 (9-8), Willingham -3 (45-48), Swords +7 (12-5)
Tulsa: Holt -7 (21-28), G.Johnson +14 (71-57), Black -7 (19-26), Hodges +9 (73-64), T.Johnson -5 (44-49), Williams +11 (56-45), Latta 0 (43-43), Paris +2 (13-11), Dorrell -3 (12-15), Lacy +1 (53-52)