Monthly Archives: June 2016

Inside the Box Score: June 29

Washington 84, San Antonio 67
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 71, Washington 72
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .550, Washington .450
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 9, Washington 18
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 32, Washington 24
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 7, Washington 12
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 2, Washington 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 94.4, Washington 116.7
Effective FG%: San Antonio .414, Washington .531
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .197, Washington .111
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .333, Washington .233
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .219, Washington .231
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Currie -23 (25-48), Hamby -20 (19-39), Appel-Marinelli -20 (17-37), McBride -24 (27-51), Jefferson -28 (19-47), Alexander +3 (50-47), Colson +8 (44-36), Montgomery +5 (40-35), Peters +1 (32-31), Ndour +3 (34-31), Gwathmey +10 (28-18)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +23 (56-33), Meesseman +27 (60-33), Dolson +20 (51-31), Hill +16 (43-27), Cloud +15 (46-31), Vaughn -3 (33-36), Latta -3 (43-46), Hartley -1 (33-34), Malott -2 (28-30), Hawkins -6 (24-30), Weisner -1 (3-4)

Indiana 95, Chicago 83
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 81, Chicago 81
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .586, Chicago .414
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 10, Chicago 14
Points in the Paint: Indiana 22, Chicago 34
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 7, Chicago 5
Fast Break Points: Indiana 4, Chicago 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 117.3, Chicago 102.5
Effective FG%: Indiana .522, Chicago .508
Turnover Pct: Indiana .198, Chicago .173
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .379, Chicago .207
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .373, Chicago .367
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Catchings +9 (74-65), Kizer +7 (33-26), Larkins +16 (90-74), Wheeler +9 (74-65), January +13 (77-64), Mitchell +2 (29-27), Peters +7 (54-47), Coleman +4 (23-19), Johnson -1 (8-9), Achonwa -6 (13-19)
Chicago: Young -5 (42-47), Delle Donne -15 (75-90), de Souza -8 (32-40), Pondexter -14 (62-76), Vandersloot -16 (58-74), Breland -5 (43-48), Faulkner +4 (25-21), Quigley -1 (21-22), Boyette -9 (38-47), Parker +5 (13-8), dos Santos +4 (6-2)

New York 95, Minnesota 92 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 94, Minnesota 93
Rebound Percentage: New York .511, Minnesota .488
Points Off Turnovers: New York 24, Minnesota 20
Points in the Paint: New York 30, Minnesota 28
2nd-Chance Points: New York 10, Minnesota 13
Fast Break Points: New York 9, Minnesota 16
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 101.1, Minnesota 98.9
Effective FG%: New York .476, Minnesota .463
Turnover Pct: New York .181, Minnesota .194
Offensive Reb%: New York .293, Minnesota .270
Free Throw Rate: New York .207, Minnesota .225
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Cash +2 (34-32), Zahui B. +14 (80-66), Swords -9 (45-54), Rodgers +2 (74-72), Wright -6 (54-60), Stokes +1 (65-64), Boyd +9 (41-32), Zellous +2 (59-57), Allen +3 (19-16), Schimmel -3 (4-7)
Minnesota: Moore -8 (70-78), Brunson -2 (67-69), Fowles -7 (78-85), Augustus -5 (56-61), Whalen -10 (51-61), Montgomery +7 (41-34), Perkins +5 (41-36), Howard +2 (25-23), McCarville +1 (14-13), Hampton +2 (17-15)

Phoenix 86, Connecticut 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 80, Phoenix 81
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .554, Phoenix .446
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 6, Phoenix 20
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 32, Phoenix 32
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, Phoenix 0
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 10, Phoenix 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 93.8, Phoenix 106.2
Effective FG%: Connecticut .441, Phoenix .551
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .175, Phoenix .185
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .256, Phoenix .148
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .105, Phoenix .356
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas -21 (46-67), Little -7 (32-39), Henry-Morello -17 (4-21), Bentley -9 (73-82), J.Thomas -23 (43-66), Jones 0 (56-56), Tuck -2 (34-36), Faris +5 (25-20), Stricklen +14 (53-39), Williams +5 (9-4)
Phoenix: Petrovic +17 (68-51), Dupree +18 (73-55), Griner +19 (71-52), Bonner +19 (81-62), Taurasi +9 (70-61), Bone -8 (15-23), Harding -8 (23-31), Harden -4 (16-20), Bass -5 (13-18), Harrison -2 (0-2)

Advertisements

Inside the Box Score: June 28

Seattle 84, Atlanta 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 75, Seattle 74
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .605, Seattle .395
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 18, Seattle 16
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 42, Seattle 42
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 19, Seattle 12
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 12, Seattle 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 108.0, Seattle 113.5
Effective FG%: Atlanta .500, Seattle .550
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .160, Seattle .189
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .432, Seattle .222
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .141, Seattle .300
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Holmes -5 (71-76), McCoughtry -3 (72-75), Williams -6 (68-74), Ajavon +4 (63-59), Clarendon -3 (21-24), Gray -17 (20-37), Cortijo -8 (16-24), Hollivay +20 (58-38), Simmons +3 (16-13)
Seattle: Clark +11 (62-51), Stewart +8 (77-69), Langhorne +2 (68-66), Loyd -5 (62-67), Bird -1 (66-67), Quinn +6 (32-26), Thomas +1 (16-15), O’Hea -8 (22-30), Tokashiki -5 (7-12), Mosqueda-Lewis +6 (8-2)

Los Angeles 89, Dallas 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 77, Los Angeles 78
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .462, Los Angeles .538
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 13, Los Angeles 25
Points in the Paint: Dallas 42, Los Angeles 56
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 11, Los Angeles 10
Fast Break Points: Dallas 5, Los Angeles 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 109.1, Los Angeles 114.1
Effective FG%: Dallas .550, Los Angeles .514
Turnover Pct: Dallas .182, Los Angeles .141
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .257, Los Angeles .333
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .100, Los Angeles .208
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Christmas -4 (77-81), Pierson -1 (70-71), Paris -5 (51-56), Phillips +5 (46-41), Diggins -7 (74-81), Johnson -4 (47-51), Sims -9 (36-45), Powers 0 (19-19)
Los Angeles: Carson +7 (81-74), Ogwumike -13 (27-40), Parker +2 (82-80), Beard -3 (63-66), Toliver +5 (80-75), Gray +10 (33-23), Lavender +25 (65-40), Dabovic -4 (10-14), Dubljevic -4 (4-8)

Inside the Box Score: June 26

Phoenix 104, New York 97 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 89, New York 88
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .404, New York .596
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 13, New York 9
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 38, New York 54
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 5, New York 19
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 5, New York 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 116.9, New York 110.2
Effective FG%: Phoenix .550, New York .494
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .101, New York .136
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .125, New York .317
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .386, New York .140
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +3 (93-90), Dupree +8 (87-79), Griner +20 (90-70), Taylor +30 (85-55), Taurasi +24 (94-70), Petrovic -16 (10-26), Harding -21 (16-37), Bass 0 (21-21), Harden +1 (14-13), Bone -14 (10-24)
New York: Cash -5 (23-28), Charles -14 (77-91), Swords -11 (21-32), Rodgers -13 (83-96), Wright -12 (64-76), Stokes -1 (63-64), Zellous -2 (74-76), Allen +6 (16-10), Boyd +5 (31-26), Zahui B. +12 (33-21)

Washington 87, Minnesota 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 73, Washington 73
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .496, Washington .504
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 8, Washington 21
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 24, Washington 30
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 3, Washington 21
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 6, Washington 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 86.3, Washington 119.2
Effective FG%: Minnesota .426, Washington .550
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .219, Washington .137
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .278, Washington .286
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .180, Washington .143
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore -19 (20-39), Brunson -24 (23-47), Fowles -18 (35-53), Augustus -21 (28-49), Whalen -15 (23-38), Howard -4 (17-21), Perkins -6 (37-43), Montgomery -9 (45-54), McCarville -1 (30-31), Hampton -2 (36-38), Graves -1 (21-22)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +18 (50-32), Meesseman +22 (51-29), Dolson +15 (46-31), Hill +20 (45-25), Cloud +22 (47-25), Latta +1 (35-34), Vaughn +9 (41-32), Hartley +2 (40-38), Malott +6 (37-31), Hawkins +2 (36-34), Weisner +3 (7-4)

Los Angeles 80, Connecticut 73
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, Los Angeles 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .493, Los Angeles .507
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 14, Los Angeles 19
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 44, Los Angeles 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 16, Los Angeles 12
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 15, Los Angeles 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 93.6, Los Angeles 102.6
Effective FG%: Connecticut .478, Los Angeles .478
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .192, Los Angeles .179
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .310, Los Angeles .324
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .118, Los Angeles .203
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas -2 (57-59), Ogwumike -5 (52-57), Little -1 (52-53), Bentley -5 (64-69), J.Thomas -3 (67-70), Jones 0 (27-27), Tuck -8 (15-23), Faris +1 (14-13), Stricklen -5 (16-21), Banham -7 (1-8)
Los Angeles: Carson +2 (41-39), Ogwumike +23 (72-49), Parker -4 (59-63), Beard +4 (67-63), Toliver +14 (74-60), Lavender -1 (48-49), Dubljevic -1 (7-8), Gray +5 (32-27), Wauters -7 (0-7)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through June 26) here or here.

Inside the Box Score: June 25

San Antonio 73, Atlanta 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 77, San Antonio 76
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .440, San Antonio .559
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 14, San Antonio 17
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 34, San Antonio 28
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 7, San Antonio 8
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 14, San Antonio 18
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 89.6, San Antonio 96.1
Effective FG%: Atlanta .423, San Antonio .397
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .169, San Antonio .184
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .242, San Antonio .361
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .215, San Antonio .205
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +5 (57-52), Lyttle +3 (56-53), Williams -4 (67-71), Hayes -8 (31-39), Clarendon -1 (50-51), Holmes -2 (44-46), Cortijo -3 (19-22), Hollivay -6 (15-21), Simmons -4 (6-10)
San Antonio: Currie -7 (28-35), Hamby +3 (61-58), Appel-Marinelli -7 (35-42), McBride -1 (59-60), Jefferson +4 (39-35), Peters +5 (14-9), Colson 0 (34-34), Montgomery +11 (45-34), Alexander +11 (38-27), Ndour +1 (12-11)

Indiana 92, Dallas 87
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 76, Dallas 76
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .417, Dallas .582
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 21, Dallas 11
Points in the Paint: Indiana 44, Dallas 44
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 16, Dallas 25
Fast Break Points: Indiana 22, Dallas 18
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 121.1, Dallas 114.5
Effective FG%: Indiana .508, Dallas .464
Turnover Pct: Indiana .105, Dallas .197
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .276, Dallas .441
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .400, Dallas .314
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Catchings +5 (72-67), Kizer +12 (49-37), Larkins +9 (82-73), Wheeler -4 (63-67), January +14 (81-67), Peters -2 (42-44), Coleman +2 (12-10), Mitchell -4 (47-51), Johnson -7 (12-19)
Dallas: Christmas +1 (75-74), Pierson -14 (37-51), Johnson +7 (85-78), Sims -4 (70-74), Diggins 0 (46-46), Phillips -4 (20-24), Paris -12 (22-34), Powers -2 (41-43), Hooper -6 (9-15), Plaisance +9 (30-21)

Inside the Box Score: June 24

Phoenix 91, Washington 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 73, Washington 74
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .522, Washington .478
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 12, Washington 6
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 30, Washington 28
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 17, Washington 16
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 2, Washington 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 124.7, Washington 106.8
Effective FG%: Phoenix .522, Washington .484
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .137, Washington .162
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .294, Washington .250
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .313, Washington .286
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +10 (60-50), Dupree +12 (57-45), Griner +11 (79-68), Taylor +11 (52-41), Taurasi +6 (66-60), Harding +7 (53-46), Bass +1 (39-38), Harden 0 (19-19), Petrovic +2 (23-21), Harrison 0 (7-7)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -8 (52-60), Meesseman -9 (66-75), Dolson -9 (43-52), Hill -9 (66-75), Cloud -6 (64-70), Copper -4 (16-20), Vaughn -3 (36-39), Latta -6 (26-32), Hartley -3 (13-16), Hawkins -3 (13-16)

New York 80, Chicago 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 76, New York 77
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .436, New York .563
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 15, New York 9
Points in the Paint: Chicago 22, New York 42
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 8, New York 14
Fast Break Points: Chicago 6, New York 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 103.9, New York 103.9
Effective FG%: Chicago .485, New York .472
Turnover Pct: Chicago .118, New York .156
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .206, New York .333
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .191, New York .167
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +6 (65-59), Delle Donne +7 (79-72), de Souza +6 (30-24), Pondexter +13 (71-58), Vandersloot +16 (75-59), Boyette -4 (35-39), Breland -12 (2-14), Faulkner -17 (4-21), Quigley -17 (20-37), Parker -3 (14-17)
New York: Cash -2 (36-38), Charles -5 (64-69), Swords +4 (26-22), Rodgers -5 (58-63), Wright -7 (56-63), Boyd +8 (24-16), Stokes 0 (57-57), Zellous +4 (37-33), Zahui B. +3 (13-10), Allen +5 (29-24)

Los Angeles 94, Minnesota 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 80, Minnesota 80
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .486, Minnesota .513
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 24, Minnesota 17
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 32, Minnesota 30
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 14, Minnesota 6
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 7, Minnesota 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 117.5, Minnesota 95.0
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .590, Minnesota .508
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .188, Minnesota .225
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .231, Minnesota .258
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .224, Minnesota .230
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Carson +13 (56-43), Ogwumike +12 (87-75), Parker +24 (84-60), Beard +13 (81-68), Toliver +21 (81-60), Gray +4 (28-24), Lavender +4 (25-21), Dubljevic -1 (28-29)
Minnesota: Moore -13 (60-73), Brunson -11 (25-36), Fowles -11 (58-69), Augustus -7 (42-49), Whalen -9 (48-57), Howard -1 (46-47), McCarville -6 (21-27), Montgomery -9 (28-37), Perkins -20 (46-66), Hampton -3 (6-9)

Seattle 98, Connecticut 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 82, Seattle 81
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .631, Seattle .369
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 12, Seattle 16
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 40, Seattle 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 20, Seattle 5
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 6, Seattle 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 98.8, Seattle 121.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .406, Seattle .684
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .146, Seattle .185
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .357, Seattle .095
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .141, Seattle .351
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas -19 (42-61), Little -5 (40-45), Bone -7 (23-30), Bentley -17 (58-75), J.Thomas -11 (51-62), Tuck -5 (29-34), Jones -3 (17-20), Ogwumike -15 (36-51), Faris -2 (34-36), Stricklen -2 (53-55), Henry-Morello +1 (22-21)
Seattle: Clark +17 (60-43), Stewart +22 (89-67), Langhorne +20 (77-57), Loyd +21 (86-65), Bird +20 (82-62), Tokashiki -6 (26-32), O’Hea +2 (37-35), Mosqueda-Lewis -5 (21-26), Dietrick -2 (4-6), Gatling -2 (4-6), Wright -2 (4-6)