Monthly Archives: July 2016

Inside the Box Score: July 22

Los Angeles 95, Washington 75
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 72, Washington 72
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .651, Washington .349
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 13, Washington 16
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Washington 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 17, Washington 8
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 6, Washington 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 131.9, Washington 104.2
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .623, Washington .516
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .153, Washington .139
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .385, Washington .083
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .311, Washington .159
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Carson +12 (56-44), Ogwumike +26 (71-45), Parker +15 (56-41), Beard +24 (59-35), Toliver +25 (70-45), Belyakova +11 (61-50), Lavender +5 (43-38), Gray -4 (30-34), Wauters -8 (20-28), Knight -6 (9-15)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -15 (45-60), Meesseman -12 (47-59), Vaughn -18 (39-57), Cloud -21 (47-68), Latta -16 (39-55), Dolson -11 (33-44), Copper -10 (44-54), Hartley 0 (31-31), Hawkins +1 (31-30), Weisner -4 (4-8), Malott +6 (15-9)

Atlanta 93, Dallas 88
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Dallas 84, Atlanta 84
Rebound Percentage: Dallas .436, Atlanta .563
Points Off Turnovers: Dallas 17, Atlanta 12
Points in the Paint: Dallas 40, Atlanta 52
2nd-Chance Points: Dallas 11, Atlanta 18
Fast Break Points: Dallas 16, Atlanta 22
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Dallas 104.8, Atlanta 110.7
Effective FG%: Dallas .453, Atlanta .507
Turnover Pct: Dallas .119, Atlanta .179
Offensive Reb%: Dallas .273, Atlanta .400
Free Throw Rate: Dallas .267, Atlanta .373
Individual Plus/Minus:
Dallas: Christmas +1 (66-65), Pierson -10 (71-81), Paris -2 (70-72), Sims -7 (81-88), Diggins -7 (66-73), Plaisance -1 (27-28), Powers -3 (28-31), Bias 0 (23-23), Hooper +4 (8-4)
Atlanta: Holmes -10 (50-60), Williams -2 (51-53), Gatling -3 (22-25), Hayes +2 (42-40), Clarendon +6 (75-69), Gray +17 (74-57), McCoughtry +16 (82-66), Ajavon +2 (12-10), Simmons -5 (9-14), Hollivay +1 (27-26), Cortijo +1 (21-20)

Minnesota 79, Seattle 72
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 74, Minnesota 76
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .416, Minnesota .583
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 15, Minnesota 17
Points in the Paint: Seattle 20, Minnesota 44
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 9, Minnesota 18
Fast Break Points: Seattle 10, Minnesota 7
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 97.3, Minnesota 103.9
Effective FG%: Seattle .456, Minnesota .455
Turnover Pct: Seattle .216, Minnesota .158
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .233, Minnesota .400
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .351, Minnesota .269
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark +11 (62-51), Stewart -7 (70-77), Langhorne +13 (62-49), Loyd -13 (54-67), Bird +9 (68-59), Thomas -20 (10-30), Quinn -22 (10-32), Mosqueda-Lewis -6 (22-28), Bishop 0 (2-2)
Minnesota: Moore -4 (61-65), Brunson -9 (43-52), Fowles -1 (57-58), Augustus -5 (33-38), Whalen -4 (35-39), Montgomery +11 (44-33), Perkins +12 (46-34), Howard +12 (38-26), Hampton +11 (18-7), McCarville +12 (20-8)

Connecticut 94, Chicago 89
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 82, Chicago 80
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .518, Chicago .482
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 21, Chicago 8
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 44, Chicago 34
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 11, Chicago 13
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 9, Chicago 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 114.6, Chicago 111.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .486, Chicago .562
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .085, Chicago .225
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .258, Chicago .222
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .371, Chicago .246
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas +6 (87-81), Ogwumike -5 (37-42), Little +4 (53-49), Bentley +7 (69-62), J.Thomas +1 (80-79), Williams -6 (3-9), Jones +9 (71-62), Tuck +2 (27-25), Stricklen -1 (7-8), Faris +8 (36-28)
Chicago: Young -6 (60-66), Delle Donne -5 (83-88), Boyette -4 (43-47), Pondexter -7 (66-73), Faulkner -4 (27-31), Breland -8 (61-69), Quigley +10 (43-33), Vandersloot -1 (62-63)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 22) here or here.

Inside the Box Score: July 21

Indiana 82, New York 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 75, New York 75
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .439, New York .560
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 16, New York 12
Points in the Paint: Indiana 26, New York 38
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 9, New York 7
Fast Break Points: Indiana 0, New York 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 109.3, New York 93.3
Effective FG%: Indiana .542, New York .500
Turnover Pct: Indiana .107, New York .227
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .182, New York .303
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .070, New York .111
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Catchings +1 (42-41), Kizer -3 (53-56), Larkins +11 (66-55), Wheeler -7 (59-66), January +20 (62-42), Coleman +16 (45-29), Johnson +14 (52-38), Mitchell +8 (31-23)
New York: Cash +10 (35-25), Charles -13 (59-72), Swords +10 (39-29), Rodgers +1 (55-54), Wright +8 (49-41), Zellous -22 (33-55), Stokes -18 (29-47), Boyd -20 (21-41), Allen -13 (15-28), Zahui B. -3 (11-14), Bulgak 0 (2-2), Schimmel 0 (2-2)

Inside the Box Score: July 20

New York 88, Washington 81
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 79, Washington 78
Rebound Percentage: New York .536, Washington .464
Points Off Turnovers: New York 13, Washington 11
Points in the Paint: New York 36, Washington 12
2nd-Chance Points: New York 14, Washington 13
Fast Break Points: New York 9, Washington 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 111.4, Washington 103.8
Effective FG%: New York .521, Washington .484
Turnover Pct: New York .127, Washington .179
Offensive Reb%: New York .314, Washington .242
Free Throw Rate: New York .214, Washington .317
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Cash -15 (15-30), Charles -1 (73-74), Swords +1 (25-24), Rodgers -12 (32-44), Wright -15 (15-30), Stokes -9 (18-27), Boyd +22 (73-51), Zellous +22 (73-51), Zahui B. +23 (60-37), Allen +19 (56-37)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -1 (68-69), Meesseman +9 (66-57), Vaughn +6 (45-39), Copper -4 (34-38), Latta 0 (70-70), Cloud -3 (47-50), Dolson -13 (36-49), Hartley -15 (13-28), Hawkins -16 (15-31), Malott +2 (11-9)

Connecticut 89, Dallas 78
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 80, Dallas 79
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .566, Dallas .433
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 15, Dallas 13
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 42, Dallas 38
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 14, Dallas 15
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 18, Dallas 16
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 111.3, Dallas 98.7
Effective FG%: Connecticut .536, Dallas .425
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .150, Dallas .139
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .344, Dallas .211
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .217, Dallas .219
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas +14 (63-49), Ogwumike +11 (80-69), Little -4 (31-35), Bentley +5 (42-37), J.Thomas +12 (76-64), Stricklen -3 (26-29), Tuck +22 (58-36), Williams +12 (60-48), Jones -5 (9-14), Faris -7 (0-7), Henry-Morello -2 (0-2)
Dallas: Christmas -7 (50-57), Pierson -19 (39-58), Paris -14 (55-69), Sims -5 (58-63), Diggins -18 (40-58), Plaisance +2 (37-35), Powers -5 (38-43), Phillips -6 (24-30), Bias +1 (17-16), Hamblin +6 (17-11), Hooper +10 (15-5)

Minnesota 83, Atlanta 65
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 74, Minnesota 75
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .554, Minnesota .445
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 12, Minnesota 18
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 36, Minnesota 28
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 18, Minnesota 11
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 11, Minnesota 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 87.8, Minnesota 110.7
Effective FG%: Atlanta .400, Minnesota .526
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .230, Minnesota .160
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .294, Minnesota .185
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .283, Minnesota .404
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: Holmes -12 (50-62), McCoughtry -5 (26-31), Williams -13 (59-72), Hayes -21 (27-48), Clarendon -17 (41-58), Gray -4 (16-20), Ajavon -9 (31-40), Hollivay -11 (11-22), Cortijo +3 (9-6), Gatling -8 (34-42), Simmons +7 (21-14)
Minnesota: Moore +8 (50-42), Brunson +13 (65-52), Fowles +18 (72-54), Augustus +13 (57-44), Whalen +12 (55-43), Montgomery +6 (28-22), Perkins +13 (45-32), Howard +5 (29-24), Hampton +2 (14-12)

Seattle 83, San Antonio 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 78, Seattle 80
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .543, Seattle .457
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 14, Seattle 10
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 30, Seattle 24
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 10, Seattle 2
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 7, Seattle 19
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 88.5, Seattle 103.8
Effective FG%: San Antonio .435, Seattle .583
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .154, Seattle .138
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .122, Seattle .036
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .130, Seattle .217
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: Currie -11 (46-57), Hamby -19 (44-63), Appel-Marinelli +6 (43-37), Montgomery -3 (53-56), Jefferson -14 (69-83), Alexander -21 (25-46), Peters -3 (28-31), Colson -13 (16-29), Ndour +1 (8-7), Gwathmey +7 (13-6)
Seattle: Clark +8 (50-42), Stewart +9 (64-55), Langhorne +12 (57-45), Loyd +17 (79-62), Bird +20 (69-49), Thomas +2 (26-24), Bishop +5 (19-14), Quinn -6 (14-20), Mosqueda-Lewis +7 (33-26), O’Hea -2 (2-4), Wright -2 (2-4)

Inside the Box Score: July 19

Indiana 92, Los Angeles 82
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 72, Indiana 73
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .622, Indiana .377
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 11, Indiana 25
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Indiana 34
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 12, Indiana 7
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 2, Indiana 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 113.9, Indiana 126.0
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .570, Indiana .619
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .278, Indiana .164
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .462, Indiana .217
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .141, Indiana .322
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Carson -7 (37-44), Ogwumike -5 (72-77), Parker -17 (58-75), Beard -14 (49-63), Toliver -2 (75-77), Gray -12 (20-32), Lavender +2 (54-52), Belyakova +5 (45-40)
Indiana: Catchings +11 (73-62), Kizer +3 (57-54), Larkins +2 (73-71), Wheeler +13 (73-60), January +3 (71-68), Mitchell +1 (21-20), Coleman +11 (43-32), Johnson 0 (38-38), Pohlen +6 (11-5)

Chicago 79, Phoenix 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 79, Phoenix 79
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .534, Phoenix .465
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 20, Phoenix 9
Points in the Paint: Chicago 30, Phoenix 36
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 4, Phoenix 4
Fast Break Points: Chicago 9, Phoenix 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 100.0, Phoenix 97.5
Effective FG%: Chicago .449, Phoenix .530
Turnover Pct: Chicago .114, Phoenix .165
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .194, Phoenix .125
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .265, Phoenix .106
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -8 (33-41), Delle Donne -1 (70-71), Boyette +12 (53-41), Pondexter +17 (40-23), Faulkner +14 (55-41), Vandersloot -3 (48-51), Breland +3 (46-43), Parker -6 (17-23), Quigley -18 (33-51)
Phoenix: Bonner -4 (71-75), Dupree +7 (71-64), Griner -13 (23-36), Taurasi -9 (56-65), Xargay +6 (42-36), Bass -10 (32-42), Harding -5 (27-32), Bone +12 (28-16), Harden +6 (35-29)

Inside the Box Score: July 17

New York 83, Connecticut 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 83, New York 83
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .503, New York .497
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 27, New York 13
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 28, New York 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 13, New York 13
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 17, New York 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 91.6, New York 100.0
Effective FG%: Connecticut .373, New York .484
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .157, New York .205
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .256, New York .250
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .324, New York .371
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: A.Thomas 0 (33-33), Jones +1 (35-34), Little -12 (41-53), Bentley -14 (42-56), J.Thomas +1 (75-74), Ogwumike -7 (59-66), Stricklen -7 (43-50), Faris -8 (1-9), Tuck +4 (17-13), Williams +7 (34-27)
New York: Cash +15 (60-45), Charles +15 (70-55), Swords +1 (29-28), Rodgers +3 (74-71), Wright -7 (36-43), Stokes +6 (54-48), Zellous -8 (23-31), Boyd +14 (47-33), Allen +4 (9-5), Zahui B. -8 (13-21)

Atlanta 91, Los Angeles 74
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 79, Atlanta 78
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .461, Atlanta .539
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 9, Atlanta 23
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Atlanta 44
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 11, Atlanta 12
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 10, Atlanta 12
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 93.7, Atlanta 116.7
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .406, Atlanta .464
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .152, Atlanta .115
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .200, Atlanta .278
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .344, Atlanta .391
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Carson -14 (49-63), Ogwumike -19 (61-80), Parker -16 (64-80), Beard -3 (57-60), Toliver -6 (48-54), Gray -6 (42-48), Lavender -8 (33-41), Belyakova -9 (16-25), Wauters -2 (0-2), Knight -2 (0-2)
Atlanta: Holmes +7 (70-63), McCoughtry +10 (52-42), Williams +13 (85-72), Hayes +15 (85-70), Clarendon +23 (79-56), Cortijo -5 (4-9), Hollivay +5 (22-17), Simmons +6 (15-9), Gatling +10 (33-23), Ajavon -1 (8-9), Gray +2 (2-0)

Minnesota 98, Dallas 97 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 94, Dallas 91
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .607, Dallas .392
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 14, Dallas 19
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 58, Dallas 38
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 18, Dallas 9
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 21, Dallas 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 104.3, Dallas 106.6
Effective FG%: Minnesota .494, Dallas .520
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .181, Dallas .165
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .386, Dallas .171
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .179, Dallas .253
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore +2 (81-79), Brunson +7 (86-79), Fowles +9 (77-68), Augustus +3 (73-70), Whalen -7 (68-75), McCarville -8 (15-23), Montgomery +12 (41-29), Perkins -7 (31-38), Howard -6 (18-24)
Dallas: Christmas +18 (94-76), Pierson -2 (82-84), Paris -7 (49-56), Sims +4 (83-79), Diggins +5 (84-79), Plaisance -7 (35-42), Powers -1 (39-40), Hooper -13 (3-16), Phillips -2 (16-18)

Chicago 91, Seattle 88
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 78, Seattle 79
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .603, Seattle .396
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 15, Seattle 15
Points in the Paint: Chicago 34, Seattle 32
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 21, Seattle 7
Fast Break Points: Chicago 6, Seattle 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 116.7, Seattle 111.4
Effective FG%: Chicago .540, Seattle .564
Turnover Pct: Chicago .167, Seattle .152
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .389, Seattle .182
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .133, Seattle .129
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Delle Donne +5 (83-78), Parker -4 (62-66), Boyette +6 (57-51), Young -2 (66-68), Faulkner +11 (48-37), Vandersloot -8 (43-51), Breland +2 (14-12), Pondexter 0 (63-63), Quigley +5 (19-14)
Seattle: Clark +9 (73-64), Stewart -3 (88-91), Langhorne +5 (50-45), Loyd -4 (69-73), Bird +2 (63-61), Quinn -7 (31-38), Thomas -8 (38-46), Mosqueda-Lewis -9 (28-37)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through July 17) here or here.