Inside the Box Score: August 30

Tulsa 76, Indiana 70
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Indiana 79, Tulsa 80
Rebound Percentage: Indiana .604, Tulsa .395
Points Off Turnovers: Indiana 10, Tulsa 19
Points in the Paint: Indiana 30, Tulsa 26
2nd-Chance Points: Indiana 6, Tulsa 0
Fast Break Points: Indiana 10, Tulsa 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Indiana 88.6, Tulsa 95.0
Effective FG%: Indiana .421, Tulsa .509
Turnover Pct: Indiana .203, Tulsa .175
Offensive Reb%: Indiana .286, Tulsa .077
Free Throw Rate: Indiana .157, Tulsa .293
Individual Plus/Minus:
Indiana: Coleman +9 (51-42), Catchings +2 (55-53), Kizer 0 (51-51), Johnson 0 (58-58), Clarendon -11 (45-56), Zellous -11 (34-45), Howard -8 (6-14), Larkins -6 (14-20), Lucas -2 (10-12), Achonwa 0 (9-9), Pohlen -3 (17-20)
Tulsa: Christmas +5 (59-54), Pierson +9 (50-41), Paris -1 (36-37), Williams +5 (18-13), Sims +9 (72-63), Baugh +8 (32-24), Zahui B. +8 (14-6), Hooper -4 (30-34), Kiesel +3 (49-46), Jackson-Jones -7 (20-27), Plaisance -5 (0-5)

Los Angeles 60, San Antonio 52
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 75, Los Angeles 74
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .608, Los Angeles .392
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 12, Los Angeles 9
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 24, Los Angeles 22
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 6, Los Angeles 3
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 6, Los Angeles 3
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 69.3, Los Angeles 81.1
Effective FG%: San Antonio .307, Los Angeles .415
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .173, Los Angeles .203
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .302, Los Angeles .086
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .080, Los Angeles .186
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride -10 (27-37), Young-Malcolm -11 (36-47), Appel -12 (34-46), Perkins -8 (39-47), Robinson -11 (36-47), Montgomery +4 (27-23), Colson +1 (27-26), Hamby +3 (16-13), Adams +4 (18-14)
Los Angeles: Dabovic +12 (50-38), Parker +12 (55-43), Lavender +9 (57-48), Toliver +10 (53-43), Johnson +2 (33-31), Beard 0 (35-35), Bradford 0 (9-9), Abdi -5 (8-13)

Connecticut 72, Chicago 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, Chicago 77
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .531, Chicago .468
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 3, Chicago 14
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 42, Chicago 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 8, Chicago 10
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 4, Chicago 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 92.3, Chicago 88.3
Effective FG%: Connecticut .459, Chicago .382
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, Chicago .143
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .257, Chicago .194
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .262, Chicago .181
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Lacy -6 (31-37), Little 0 (32-32), Bone +3 (53-50), Faris +8 (62-54), J.Thomas +5 (57-52), Pedersen +13 (53-40), Greene -8 (6-14), Gray +13 (47-34), Stricklen -8 (19-27)
Chicago: Young +6 (56-50), Breland +3 (56-53), de Souza -11 (29-40), Quigley -6 (56-62), Vandersloot 0 (55-55), Laney -3 (24-27), dos Santos +5 (38-33), Parker -5 (13-18), Faulkner -4 (13-17), Gemelos -5 (0-5)

Minnesota 71, Phoenix 61
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 77, Minnesota 78
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .367, Minnesota .633
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 3, Minnesota 18
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 32, Minnesota 28
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 1, Minnesota 11
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Minnesota 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 79.2, Minnesota 91.0
Effective FG%: Phoenix .439, Minnesota .356
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .169, Minnesota .179
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .067, Minnesota .333
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .193, Minnesota .260
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner -10 (61-71), Dupree -9 (53-62), Griner -9 (56-65), Currie -11 (18-29), Xargay -10 (27-37), Mitchell 0 (34-34), Quinn +1 (43-42), Francis -2 (13-15)
Minnesota: Moore +10 (71-61), Brunson +5 (30-25), Fowles +9 (55-46), Cruz +15 (69-54), Whalen -4 (19-23), Montgomery +11 (50-39), Peters +4 (49-45), Jones 0 (12-12)

Seattle 69, Washington 59
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Washington 74, Seattle 74
Rebound Percentage: Washington .528, Seattle .471
Points Off Turnovers: Washington 20, Seattle 21
Points in the Paint: Washington 34, Seattle 18
2nd-Chance Points: Washington 8, Seattle 7
Fast Break Points: Washington 4, Seattle 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Washington 79.7, Seattle 93.2
Effective FG%: Washington .379, Seattle .442
Turnover Pct: Washington .216, Seattle .284
Offensive Reb%: Washington .265, Seattle .208
Free Throw Rate: Washington .136, Seattle .721
Individual Plus/Minus:
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt -3 (31-34), Meesseman -1 (51-52), Dolson +2 (34-32), Cloud +2 (44-42), Latta -14 (51-65), Vaughn -12 (25-37), Hartley -7 (38-45), Herrington -4 (13-17), Sanders -9 (8-17), Malott -4 (0-4)
Seattle: Clark -5 (31-36), Langhorne +11 (64-53), Gatling -2 (23-25), Loyd +13 (58-45), Bird 0 (52-52), O’Hea +7 (43-36), Mosqueda-Lewis -2 (18-20), Hollingsworth +18 (39-21), Goodrich +10 (17-7)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through Aug. 30) here or here.

Inside the Box Score: August 29

New York 80, Connecticut 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: New York 76, Connecticut 76
Rebound Percentage: New York .546, Connecticut .453
Points Off Turnovers: New York 22, Connecticut 18
Points in the Paint: New York 40, Connecticut 32
2nd-Chance Points: New York 10, Connecticut 9
Fast Break Points: New York 4, Connecticut 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: New York 105.3, Connecticut 86.8
Effective FG%: New York .576, Connecticut .517
Turnover Pct: New York .197, Connecticut .250
Offensive Reb%: New York .200, Connecticut .107
Free Throw Rate: New York .203, Connecticut .103
Individual Plus/Minus:
New York: Cash +4 (51-47), Charles +4 (60-56), Swords +1 (38-37), Prince +8 (64-56), Wright +4 (35-31), Boyd +12 (23-11), Stokes +23 (62-39), Carson +10 (27-17), Rodgers +6 (16-10), Wiggins -2 (24-26)
Connecticut: Lacy -5 (46-51), Little -4 (49-53), Bone -11 (55-66), Faris -1 (49-50), J.Thomas -17 (45-62), Stricklen -16 (29-45), Gray -3 (29-32), Pedersen -9 (22-31), Greene -4 (6-10)

Chicago 98, Atlanta 96
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 77, Atlanta 79
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .475, Atlanta .525
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 5, Atlanta 13
Points in the Paint: Chicago 38, Atlanta 44
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 12, Atlanta 22
Fast Break Points: Chicago 9, Atlanta 20
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 127.3, Atlanta 121.5
Effective FG%: Chicago .564, Atlanta .459
Turnover Pct: Chicago .130, Atlanta .076
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .379, Atlanta .429
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .271, Atlanta .378
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young -3 (73-76), Breland -3 (61-64), de Souza +6 (58-52), Pondexter +4 (81-77), Vandersloot +4 (78-74), dos Santos -7 (50-57), Quigley -5 (33-38), Laney +2 (22-20), Parker +7 (20-13), Faulkner +5 (14-9)
Atlanta: Milton-Jones -9 (17-26), Lyttle -4 (60-64), Dantas -1 (62-63), Hayes -3 (51-54), Schimmel -2 (40-42), Carter +8 (43-35), Henry -3 (16-19), McCoughtry +10 (83-73), Ajavon -8 (56-64), Gray +2 (52-50)

Inside the Box Score: August 28

Washington 71, Phoenix 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 75, Washington 76
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .581, Washington .419
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 9, Washington 19
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 28, Washington 22
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 13, Washington 6
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 0, Washington 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 84.0, Washington 93.4
Effective FG%: Phoenix .446, Washington .467
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .267, Washington .158
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .265, Washington .103
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .077, Washington .250
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner -11 (45-56), Dupree -13 (45-58), Griner -9 (48-57), Currie -7 (15-22), Xargay -7 (19-26), Mitchell -1 (44-45), Quinn -1 (48-49), Francis +4 (24-20), Harden +3 (18-15), Bass +2 (9-7)
Washington: Ruffin-Pratt +14 (53-39), Meesseman +11 (50-39), Dolson +13 (50-37), Cloud +18 (59-41), Latta +10 (59-49), Hartley -10 (15-25), Herrington -4 (20-24), Sanders -3 (21-24), Vaughn -5 (21-26), Malott -4 (7-11)

Atlanta 90, Indiana 84
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 81, Indiana 80
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .564, Indiana .435
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 24, Indiana 15
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 46, Indiana 36
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 12, Indiana 4
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 25, Indiana 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 111.1, Indiana 105.0
Effective FG%: Atlanta .468, Indiana .517
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .185, Indiana .238
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .321, Indiana .192
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .492, Indiana .390
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry -17 (31-48), Lyttle +22 (58-36), Dantas -7 (15-22), Hayes +14 (85-71), Schimmel +1 (48-47), Ajavon +14 (54-40), Gray -11 (26-37), Henry -9 (14-23), Carter +6 (52-46), Milton-Jones +17 (67-50)
Indiana: Coleman -13 (28-41), Catchings +2 (62-60), Kizer +2 (50-48), Johnson -11 (65-76), January +10 (19-9), Achonwa -5 (15-20), Clarendon -3 (56-59), Howard -5 (9-14), Zellous -6 (44-50), Lucas +4 (32-28), Larkins -6 (32-38), Pohlen +1 (8-7)

New York 81, Minnesota 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 76, New York 76
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .469, New York .531
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 19, New York 11
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 28, New York 40
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 20, New York 13
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 2, New York 5
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 89.5, New York 106.6
Effective FG%: Minnesota .388, New York .537
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .118, New York .184
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .238, New York .300
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .239, New York .134
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: Moore -10 (68-78), Brunson -11 (16-27), Fowles 0 (58-58), Cruz -13 (44-57), Whalen -12 (51-63), Jones -4 (35-39), Peters -12 (32-44), Montgomery -1 (17-18), Liston -2 (19-21)
New York: Cash +17 (52-35), Charles +14 (76-62), Swords +7 (29-22), Prince +19 (61-42), Wright +13 (51-38), Stokes +1 (52-51), Boyd -4 (13-17), Carson -4 (27-31), Wiggins -3 (18-21), Rodgers +1 (21-20), Warley-Talbert +4 (5-1)

Tulsa 76, Los Angeles 66
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 74, Tulsa 74
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .388, Tulsa .611
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 10, Tulsa 9
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Tulsa 42
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 8, Tulsa 14
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 4, Tulsa 8
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 89.2, Tulsa 102.7
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .475, Tulsa .439
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .189, Tulsa .176
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .182, Tulsa .405
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .150, Tulsa .273
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Dabovic -5 (54-59), Parker -10 (58-68), Lavender -10 (66-76), Toliver -13 (53-66), Johnson -2 (51-53), Bradford -7 (28-35), Hamson -3 (10-13), Abdi 0 (10-10)
Tulsa: Christmas +11 (59-48), Baugh +10 (16-6), Paris +14 (63-49), Williams +13 (66-53), Sims +11 (67-56), Pierson +2 (47-45), Zahui B. 0 (8-8), Hooper -2 (25-27), Kiesel -3 (11-14), Jackson-Jones +1 (16-15), Plaisance -7 (2-9)

Seattle 83, San Antonio 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 79, Seattle 78
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .450, Seattle .549
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 24, Seattle 14
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 28, Seattle 38
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 10, Seattle 13
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Seattle 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 87.3, Seattle 106.4
Effective FG%: San Antonio .408, Seattle .492
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .152, Seattle .244
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .222, Seattle .321
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .246, Seattle .355
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride -8 (53-61), Young-Malcolm -10 (42-52), Appel -4 (35-39), Perkins -14 (42-56), Robinson -16 (37-53), Colson -3 (28-31), Hamby 0 (23-23), Adams -8 (25-33), Montgomery -2 (33-35), Ayayi -1 (3-4), Alexander -6 (13-19), Logic +2 (11-9)
Seattle: Clark +17 (53-36), Langhorne +7 (61-54), Gatling +3 (43-40), Loyd +5 (47-42), Bird +11 (68-57), O’Hea +13 (60-47), Mosqueda-Lewis +9 (46-37), Hollingsworth +3 (26-23), Goodrich +2 (11-9)

Inside the Box Score: August 27

Phoenix 81, Connecticut 80
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 73, Connecticut 73
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .567, Connecticut .432
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 14, Connecticut 23
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 36, Connecticut 40
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 17, Connecticut 4
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 5, Connecticut 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 111.0, Connecticut 109.6
Effective FG%: Phoenix .563, Connecticut .500
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .233, Connecticut .123
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .393, Connecticut .258
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .321, Connecticut .159
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner -4 (70-74), Dupree -13 (49-62), Griner +6 (71-65), Currie +3 (52-49), Xargay -16 (15-31), Mitchell +14 (59-45), Francis +8 (13-5), Quinn +6 (47-41), Bass +1 (29-28)
Connecticut: Lacy -8 (39-47), Little +10 (58-48), Bone -5 (62-67), Faris 0 (58-58), J.Thomas +5 (69-64), Gray -2 (29-31), Pedersen -11 (22-33), Stricklen +2 (45-43), Greene +4 (18-14)

Inside the Box Score: August 26

Los Angeles 81, Indiana 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 76, Indiana 76
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .490, Indiana .509
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 12, Indiana 11
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 30, Indiana 36
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 8, Indiana 13
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 6, Indiana 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 106.6, Indiana 103.9
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .508, Indiana .516
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .132, Indiana .197
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .281, Indiana .300
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .270, Indiana .222
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Parker +5 (79-74), Lavender +2 (77-75), Tolo -4 (8-12), Dabovic -5 (72-77), Toliver +4 (74-70), Johnson -4 (39-43), Bradford +15 (50-35), Hamson -3 (6-9)
Indiana: Coleman -15 (46-61), Catchings +7 (66-59), Kizer +5 (52-47), Johnson +3 (51-48), January 0 (60-60), Clarendon -7 (23-30), Zellous +9 (54-45), Achonwa -7 (27-34), Lucas -5 (16-21)