Inside the Box Score: June 29

New York 67, Connecticut 65
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 78, New York 78
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .597, New York .402
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 14, New York 16
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 36, New York 34
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, New York 7
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 10, New York 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 83.3, New York 85.9
Effective FG%: Connecticut .377, New York .434
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, New York .192
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .366, New York .171
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .137, New York .230
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Thomas +11 (61-50), Ogwumike -2 (54-56), Bone +7 (55-48), Douglas -3 (54-57), Bentley +3 (47-44), Griffin 0 (12-12), Montgomery -5 (18-23), Hightower -12 (15-27), Pedersen -9 (9-18)
New York: Montgomery -2 (50-52), Warley-Talbert -1 (19-20), Charles -3 (50-53), Pondexter -2 (60-62), Cruz +1 (39-38), Pierson 0 (32-32), Rodgers +5 (35-30), Houston +4 (17-13), McKinney +5 (7-2), Milton-Jones +3 (26-23)

San Antonio 73, Washington 65
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: San Antonio 72, Washington 72
Rebound Percentage: San Antonio .453, Washington .547
Points Off Turnovers: San Antonio 18, Washington 9
Points in the Paint: San Antonio 28, Washington 30
2nd-Chance Points: San Antonio 15, Washington 12
Fast Break Points: San Antonio 8, Washington 10
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: San Antonio 101.4, Washington 90.3
Effective FG%: San Antonio .454, Washington .397
Turnover Pct: San Antonio .125, Washington .167
Offensive Reb%: San Antonio .222, Washington .316
Free Throw Rate: San Antonio .215, Washington .238
Individual Plus/Minus:
San Antonio: McBride +17 (58-41), Adams +9 (39-30), Appel +23 (61-38), Hammon +19 (61-42), Robinson +13 (67-54), Young-Malcolm -1 (36-37), Johnson -14 (14-28), Alexander -15 (10-25), Christon -9 (15-24), Butler -2 (4-6)
Washington: Currie -9 (41-50), Meesseman -19 (36-55), Vaughn -10 (26-36), Latta -8 (59-67), Hartley -16 (26-42), Dolson +2 (39-37), Lawson +6 (45-39), Ruffin-Pratt +3 (24-21), Hawkins +11 (29-18)

Phoenix 80, Tulsa 77
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 77, Tulsa 77
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .348, Tulsa .652
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 12, Tulsa 8
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 38, Tulsa 34
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 2, Tulsa 21
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 14, Tulsa 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 103.9, Tulsa 100.0
Effective FG%: Phoenix .510, Tulsa .344
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .182, Tulsa .169
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .125, Tulsa .429
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .549, Tulsa .312
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +6 (69-63), Dupree +1 (63-62), Griner +2 (75-73), Taylor -1 (55-56), Taurasi -1 (67-68), Bass +3 (22-19), Phillips +9 (37-28), Jekabsone-Zogota -1 (7-8), Murphy -3 (5-8)
Tulsa: Hodges +2 (57-55), Johnson -5 (58-63), Paris +4 (53-49), Sims -5 (67-72), Diggins -2 (65-67), Hooper -3 (30-33), Baugh -2 (24-26), Lacy +2 (19-17), Goodrich -1 (12-13), Plaisance -5 (0-5)

Atlanta 76, Indiana 68
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 78, Indiana 77
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .421, Indiana .578
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 14, Indiana 13
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 46, Indiana 22
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 12, Indiana 10
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 12, Indiana 1
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 97.4, Indiana 88.3
Effective FG%: Atlanta .524, Indiana .452
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .192, Indiana .260
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .167, Indiana .324
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .159, Indiana .175
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry +7 (69-62), Lyttle +8 (65-57), de Souza +11 (67-56), Hayes +12 (63-51), Dumerc +10 (38-28), Schimmel +7 (29-22), Thomas -11 (20-31), Cash +1 (6-5), Henry -4 (14-18), Ajavon -1 (9-10)
Indiana: Coleman 0 (44-44), Larkins +3 (58-55), Thomas -14 (9-23), Zellous -7 (56-63), January -2 (48-50), Howard -2 (48-50), Christmas -9 (28-37), Clarendon -2 (10-12), Lucas -9 (10-19), Kizer +8 (17-9), Carter -6 (12-18)

Minnesota 74, Seattle 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Seattle 78, Minnesota 78
Rebound Percentage: Seattle .383, Minnesota .616
Points Off Turnovers: Seattle 20, Minnesota 15
Points in the Paint: Seattle 22, Minnesota 26
2nd-Chance Points: Seattle 6, Minnesota 12
Fast Break Points: Seattle 14, Minnesota 6
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Seattle 88.5, Minnesota 94.9
Effective FG%: Seattle .516, Minnesota .445
Turnover Pct: Seattle .192, Minnesota .244
Offensive Reb%: Seattle .091, Minnesota .324
Free Throw Rate: Seattle .098, Minnesota .266
Individual Plus/Minus:
Seattle: Clark -1 (38-39), Langhorne -11 (35-46), Little -3 (60-63), Quinn -14 (24-38), Bird -11 (51-62), O’Hea -1 (52-53), Powell +1 (9-8), Stricklen +1 (26-25), Johnson +7 (21-14), Robinson +7 (29-22)
Minnesota: M.Moore +3 (65-62), Dantas +10 (48-38), McCarville +2 (53-51), Wright +12 (54-42), Whalen +2 (60-58), Peters -1 (39-40), Liston -7 (16-23), Taylor -2 (6-8), White +9 (27-18), McKenith -3 (2-5)

– – –

You can view/download PDFs of the current league reports (through June 29) here.

Inside the Box Score: June 28

Los Angeles 92, Tulsa 89 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Los Angeles 91, Tulsa 92
Rebound Percentage: Los Angeles .470, Tulsa .529
Points Off Turnovers: Los Angeles 16, Tulsa 11
Points in the Paint: Los Angeles 54, Tulsa 44
2nd-Chance Points: Los Angeles 12, Tulsa 9
Fast Break Points: Los Angeles 18, Tulsa 16
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Los Angeles 101.1, Tulsa 96.7
Effective FG%: Los Angeles .487, Tulsa .453
Turnover Pct: Los Angeles .132, Tulsa .185
Offensive Reb%: Los Angeles .216, Tulsa .275
Free Throw Rate: Los Angeles .237, Tulsa .297
Individual Plus/Minus:
Los Angeles: Ogwumike -4 (73-77), Parker +11 (84-73), Lavender +11 (63-52), Beard 0 (40-40), Herrington 0 (63-63), Harding +3 (71-68), Gruda -5 (16-21), Toliver -1 (50-51)
Tulsa: Hodges +4 (38-34), Johnson -2 (81-83), Paris -6 (66-72), Sims 0 (81-81), Diggins -6 (76-82), Goodrich +3 (13-10), Lacy -4 (15-19), Baugh +3 (23-20), Hooper -7 (52-59)

Inside the Box Score: June 27

Phoenix 81, Indiana 76
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Phoenix 77, Indiana 77
Rebound Percentage: Phoenix .422, Indiana .577
Points Off Turnovers: Phoenix 23, Indiana 14
Points in the Paint: Phoenix 36, Indiana 26
2nd-Chance Points: Phoenix 5, Indiana 11
Fast Break Points: Phoenix 6, Indiana 0
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Phoenix 105.2, Indiana 98.7
Effective FG%: Phoenix .447, Indiana .492
Turnover Pct: Phoenix .104, Indiana .247
Offensive Reb%: Phoenix .121, Indiana .276
Free Throw Rate: Phoenix .526, Indiana .305
Individual Plus/Minus:
Phoenix: Bonner +3 (63-60), Dupree 0 (69-69), Griner +1 (63-62), Taylor +8 (64-56), Taurasi +6 (69-63), Phillips -7 (24-31), Bass +9 (30-21), Jekabsone-Zogota +2 (11-9), Murphy +3 (12-9)
Indiana: Coleman -8 (71-79), Larkins -10 (60-70), Thomas -3 (60-63), Zellous +3 (65-62), January -3 (60-63), Christmas -2 (40-42), Clarendon -2 (16-18), Howard +1 (5-4), Lucas -2 (2-4), Kizer +1 (1-0)

Washington 69, Connecticut 63
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Connecticut 73, Washington 72
Rebound Percentage: Connecticut .395, Washington .605
Points Off Turnovers: Connecticut 21, Washington 16
Points in the Paint: Connecticut 22, Washington 36
2nd-Chance Points: Connecticut 15, Washington 12
Fast Break Points: Connecticut 10, Washington 4
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Connecticut 86.3, Washington 95.8
Effective FG%: Connecticut .423, Washington .412
Turnover Pct: Connecticut .205, Washington .236
Offensive Reb%: Connecticut .290, Washington .500
Free Throw Rate: Connecticut .123, Washington .191
Individual Plus/Minus:
Connecticut: Thomas -15 (49-64), Ogwumike -12 (44-56), Bone -9 (42-51), Douglas -5 (51-56), Bentley -7 (44-51), Hightower +8 (26-18), Griffin +8 (30-22), Montgomery +1 (19-18), Pedersen +1 (10-9)
Washington: Currie +15 (48-33), Meesseman +10 (60-50), Vaughn +15 (46-31), Latta +14 (68-54), Hartley +6 (60-54), Ruffin-Pratt -9 (30-39), Dolson -11 (21-32), Greene -6 (3-9), Hawkins -4 (9-13)

Chicago 73, New York 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 71, New York 72
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .415, New York .585
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 9, New York 21
Points in the Paint: Chicago 16, New York 40
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 8, New York 18
Fast Break Points: Chicago 2, New York 9
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 102.8, New York 95.8
Effective FG%: Chicago .527, New York .451
Turnover Pct: Chicago .211, New York .222
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .200, New York .370
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .273, New York .230
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Young +2 (69-67), Breland -5 (30-35), Fowles -3 (34-37), Prince 0 (67-67), Vandersloot +4 (65-61), Goodlett +8 (29-21), Quigley +11 (43-32), Faulkner 0 (8-8), Clements +2 (6-4), Gatling +1 (14-13)
New York: Montgomery -4 (55-59), Warley-Talbert +1 (35-34), Charles +8 (59-51), Pondexter -2 (57-59), Cruz +4 (49-45), McKinney -6 (6-12), Pierson -10 (25-35), Rodgers -10 (32-42), Carson 0 (14-14), Milton-Jones -1 (13-14)

Seattle 81, Minnesota 71
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Minnesota 73, Seattle 71
Rebound Percentage: Minnesota .484, Seattle .515
Points Off Turnovers: Minnesota 22, Seattle 4
Points in the Paint: Minnesota 42, Seattle 28
2nd-Chance Points: Minnesota 16, Seattle 16
Fast Break Points: Minnesota 5, Seattle 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Minnesota 97.3, Seattle 114.1
Effective FG%: Minnesota .419, Seattle .559
Turnover Pct: Minnesota .082, Seattle .225
Offensive Reb%: Minnesota .265, Seattle .296
Free Throw Rate: Minnesota .206, Seattle .254
Individual Plus/Minus:
Minnesota: M.Moore -9 (69-78), Dantas +3 (52-49), McCarville -10 (32-42), Augustus -9 (61-70), Whalen -9 (56-65), Peters -4 (8-12), White -2 (27-29), Wright -3 (25-28), Liston -4 (4-8), Taylor -3 (21-24)
Seattle: Clark +12 (52-40), Langhorne +3 (43-40), Little +14 (75-61), Quinn +10 (60-50), Bird +14 (68-54), Powell +1 (36-35), Johnson -4 (13-17), O’Hea +3 (35-32), Stricklen -3 (23-26), Robinson 0 (0-0)

Inside the Box Score: June 26

Atlanta 81, San Antonio 79
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Atlanta 79, San Antonio 80
Rebound Percentage: Atlanta .554, San Antonio .445
Points Off Turnovers: Atlanta 14, San Antonio 17
Points in the Paint: Atlanta 44, San Antonio 22
2nd-Chance Points: Atlanta 18, San Antonio 10
Fast Break Points: Atlanta 17, San Antonio 13
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Atlanta 102.5, San Antonio 98.8
Effective FG%: Atlanta .486, San Antonio .516
Turnover Pct: Atlanta .165, San Antonio .200
Offensive Reb%: Atlanta .325, San Antonio .216
Free Throw Rate: Atlanta .169, San Antonio .203
Individual Plus/Minus:
Atlanta: McCoughtry -3 (58-61), Lyttle +2 (66-64), de Souza +7 (61-54), Hayes +15 (66-51), Thomas +16 (42-26), Dumerc -9 (43-52), Henry -1 (25-26), Schimmel -9 (31-40), Ajavon -5 (7-12), Colhado -3 (6-9)
San Antonio: McBride -18 (18-36), Young-Malcolm -9 (37-46), Appel -9 (42-51), Hammon -8 (38-46), Robinson -1 (67-68), Adams +8 (54-46), Alexander +3 (13-10), Johnson +7 (50-43), Perkins +7 (41-34), Christon +10 (35-25)

Inside the Box Score: June 25

Connecticut 79, Chicago 69
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Chicago 73, Connecticut 73
Rebound Percentage: Chicago .356, Connecticut .643
Points Off Turnovers: Chicago 16, Connecticut 20
Points in the Paint: Chicago 44, Connecticut 34
2nd-Chance Points: Chicago 8, Connecticut 14
Fast Break Points: Chicago 4, Connecticut 14
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Chicago 94.5, Connecticut 108.2
Effective FG%: Chicago .440, Connecticut .413
Turnover Pct: Chicago .178, Connecticut .233
Offensive Reb%: Chicago .250, Connecticut .537
Free Throw Rate: Chicago .149, Connecticut .227
Individual Plus/Minus:
Chicago: Delle Donne -2 (35-37), Breland -5 (47-52), Fowles +6 (55-49), Prince -6 (46-52), Vandersloot -10 (48-58), Young -8 (43-51), Goodlett -13 (12-25), Faulkner 0 (21-21), Quigley -6 (32-38), Clements -3 (4-7), Gatling -3 (2-5)
Connecticut: Thomas +16 (65-49), Ogwumike +6 (58-52), Bone +16 (40-24), Douglas +21 (68-47), Bentley +14 (60-46), Griffin -2 (41-43), Montgomery -17 (22-39), Faris -2 (22-24), Pedersen 0 (19-19), Cain -2 (0-2)

Tulsa 107, Indiana 102 (OT)
Team Comparison:
Total Possessions: Tulsa 94, Indiana 93
Rebound Percentage: Tulsa .507, Indiana .492
Points Off Turnovers: Tulsa 12, Indiana 19
Points in the Paint: Tulsa 56, Indiana 34
2nd-Chance Points: Tulsa 13, Indiana 18
Fast Break Points: Tulsa 14, Indiana 2
Four Factors:
Offensive Efficiency: Tulsa 113.8, Indiana 109.7
Effective FG%: Tulsa .551, Indiana .493
Turnover Pct: Tulsa .160, Indiana .129
Offensive Reb%: Tulsa .250, Indiana .235
Free Throw Rate: Tulsa .269, Indiana .392
Individual Plus/Minus:
Tulsa: Hodges -4 (44-48), Johnson +2 (80-78), Paris +6 (91-85), Sims +9 (101-92), Diggins +5 (101-96), Lacy +1 (32-31), Hooper +12 (66-54), Baugh -4 (0-4), Goodrich -4 (12-16), Plaisance +2 (8-6)
Indiana: Christmas -23 (64-87), Coleman +7 (91-84), Larkins -8 (83-91), Zellous +6 (98-92), January +3 (81-78), Howard +4 (21-17), Clarendon -8 (21-29), Kizer -3 (31-34), Lucas -10 (13-23), Thomas +7 (7-0)